21.09.2015 Views

The Quest for Relevant Air Power

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

342 │ CONCLUSION<br />

While including other select European air <strong>for</strong>ces would increase<br />

the total number of combat aircraft, they would not add<br />

substantially to air mobility. <strong>The</strong> UK and France, <strong>for</strong> instance, had<br />

the only significant European tanker fleets and were the only air<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces to have a national and deployable airborne early warning<br />

component in the 1990s. 3 Moreover, the USAF long-range bomber<br />

and strategic airlift fleets had no equivalent in Europe, and American<br />

combat aircraft were on average more advanced than their<br />

European counterparts. Partly through reductions in numbers,<br />

the Continental Europeans attempted to generate more interoperable<br />

and deployable air power. In terms of mere numbers, the UK,<br />

France, and Germany were comparable. Yet unlike France, <strong>for</strong> instance,<br />

the UK had already focused upon complex conventional<br />

air power during the Cold War, and export potentials influenced<br />

aircraft specifications to a lesser degree. 4 Moreover, as Desert<br />

Storm proved, the RAF was the only European air <strong>for</strong>ce capable of<br />

playing a leading role in a major combined air campaign at the<br />

outset of the post–Cold War era.<br />

For the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future, the United States will retain its air<br />

power dominance. Though Europe’s currently planned 1,320 newgeneration<br />

combat aircraft seem impressive, they are by no means<br />

all usable in deployed operations, particularly due to a lack of<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce enablers. European defence resources turned out to be too<br />

scarce <strong>for</strong> the buildup of a tanker fleet that is even remotely comparable<br />

to that of the USAF. <strong>Air</strong> bases and equipment <strong>for</strong> deployed<br />

operations are also lacking, as has been demonstrated by NATO<br />

Response Force packages. Up to the time of writing, deployable<br />

air bases have remained a bottleneck, and only the RAF and FAF<br />

have been able to provide deployable air bases on a national basis.<br />

On the positive side, programmes such as the A400M are under<br />

way to remedy the situation. This airbus is expected to become the<br />

backbone of the multinational European <strong>Air</strong> Transport Command<br />

and is likely to considerably enhance European intertheatre<br />

airlift capacities.<br />

Shortcomings in materiel can partly be compensated <strong>for</strong> through<br />

bi- and multinational cooperation, as the RNLAF has proven.<br />

Through embedding its <strong>Air</strong> Force into multilateral approaches,<br />

combined with its willingness to share risks across the spectrum<br />

of military operations, the Netherlands has counterbalanced a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!