21.09.2015 Views

The Quest for Relevant Air Power

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ROYAL NETHERLANDS <strong>Air</strong> Force │ 231<br />

ing to the 1:2:1 <strong>for</strong>mula, allocating half of the budget to the Army<br />

and approximately a quarter each to the other services. 43<br />

According to the broad approach to air power which this book<br />

takes, the air power assets of the Navy and Army have to be included<br />

as well. In the 1990s, the Army operated between 60 and 95<br />

Gepard self-propelled, radar guided anti-aircraft guns, between 60<br />

and 131 towed anti-aircraft guns, and approximately 300 Stinger<br />

man-portable air defence systems. Furthermore, the Navy operated<br />

22 Lynx helicopters and 13 P-3C Orion anti-submarine warfare<br />

aircraft. 44 While the P-3Cs were sold to Germany and Portugal,<br />

the 21 remaining Lynx airframes, including four kept in<br />

non-flyable condition, were brought under the auspices of the<br />

Command of the <strong>Air</strong> Forces in 2008. 45 In addition to these aircraft,<br />

the Navy operated between 10 and 14 frigates, all equipped<br />

with air defence systems. 46 If these systems are included, air power<br />

expenditure is greater than the funding of the single services<br />

might suggest. However, it is still considerably lower as a proportion<br />

than that of the United States. This state of affairs prompted<br />

an RNLAF lieutenant colonel to maintain, “I see no recognition of<br />

the fact that . . . air power is at the core, at the heart of the European<br />

military capability gap.” 47<br />

Despite the relatively low budget, the RNLAF became from the<br />

early 1990s up to 2002 the weapon of choice in operations at the<br />

upper end of the spectrum of military <strong>for</strong>ce. According to a Dutch<br />

commentator, the RNLAF gained quite a reputation among politicians<br />

in the wake of the air operations over the Balkans. Contrary<br />

to the Army’s troublesome experience in Bosnia, Dutch air power<br />

was perceived to add to the Netherlands’ prestige abroad. As a<br />

result, from 1999 to 2002, the RNLAF was indeed the preferred<br />

instrument—at least in the eyes of major factions in <strong>The</strong> Hague<br />

and in the media. An example is the Parliament’s insistence that<br />

the Dutch land contribution to the operation United Nations Mission<br />

in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE) in 2000–2001 was to be<br />

accompanied by Apache combat helicopters. Yet, according to an<br />

interviewee, the Dutch perspective on air power has become less<br />

enthusiastic. 48 This might be because stabilisation operations in<br />

Iraq and Afghanistan have required relatively large ground <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

contingents. Against this backdrop, the Royal Netherlands Army<br />

has also gained respect <strong>for</strong> its international commitments. During

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!