21.09.2015 Views

The Quest for Relevant Air Power

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONCLUSION │ 349<br />

of these ventures, major European air <strong>for</strong>ces, such as the RAF or<br />

the FAF, have gained leadership experience by taking on responsibility<br />

<strong>for</strong> combined air component commands. Yet, despite the<br />

adoption of a common operational doctrine, certain distinct features<br />

have been retained by the air <strong>for</strong>ces examined. <strong>The</strong> RNLAF<br />

has employed its swing-role concept to great effect, and the FAF<br />

has excelled in deploying small contingents <strong>for</strong> integrated operations<br />

in Africa.<br />

In Kosovo in 1999, air power was the weapon of choice <strong>for</strong> not<br />

only the United States but also <strong>for</strong> European participants. Yet unlike<br />

USAF doctrine, a fragile political environment has resulted in<br />

a gradualist Continental European approach to the use of air<br />

power—demonstrated in Allied Force. Continental Europeans are<br />

reluctant to get involved in “shock and awe” air campaigns, given<br />

the casualty sensitivity in the context of wars of choice. Germany<br />

and Sweden—with their particular but different legacies—prefer<br />

stabilisation operations, where air power is used in an integrated<br />

mode and plays a rather ancillary role. In fact, a transatlantic division<br />

of labour was apparent. While European nations provided<br />

the bulk of ground <strong>for</strong>ces in Bosnia and Kosovo, Americans provided<br />

most of the assets <strong>for</strong> air operations. For instance, the<br />

Clinton administration steadfastly refused to commit ground<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces to UNPROFOR in Bosnia, but the United States was the key<br />

player in Deny Flight and Deliberate Force. 8 France has often embedded<br />

air power into integrated operations. In 1995 the French<br />

military promoted the presence of a heavy ground component in<br />

Bosnia that could be used in conjunction with the air strikes.<br />

Sweden also puts a premium upon integrated operations. <strong>The</strong> NBG<br />

Gripen detachment is primarily geared up <strong>for</strong> the joint battle. This<br />

emphasis upon jointness partly explains why European air <strong>for</strong>ces<br />

do not receive the same priority in the overall defence structure as<br />

American air power does. In contrast, the USAF considers the independent<br />

long-range strike role as one of its raisons d’être.<br />

Yet, growing involvement in out-of-area operation can cause<br />

increased expenditure on air power. In the case of Germany, the<br />

A400M programme together with the Eurofighter is about to consume<br />

a significant share of the defence equipment budget. Deployed<br />

operations in general have had far-reaching implications<br />

<strong>for</strong> procurement, serving as a major catalyst in <strong>for</strong>ce protection,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!