21.09.2015 Views

The Quest for Relevant Air Power

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION │ 7<br />

assets. Since it is not feasible to cover all Continental European air<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces in the required depth in this study, criteria <strong>for</strong> the choice of<br />

air <strong>for</strong>ces were devised. Foremost, it was decided to look at the<br />

major Continental European players, of which there were several<br />

at the outset of the post–Cold War era. In contrast to smaller<br />

European air <strong>for</strong>ces—primarily relegated to defensive counterair,<br />

air policing, and airlift missions—the <strong>for</strong>ces chosen offer a larger<br />

air power spectrum <strong>for</strong> examination and are more comparable to<br />

the major Anglo-Saxon players. Diversity in defence and alliance<br />

policies, real operations, and air power hardware was another selection<br />

criterion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> air <strong>for</strong>ces that best fit these criteria are the Armée de l’<strong>Air</strong><br />

(French <strong>Air</strong> Force), Luftwaffe (German <strong>Air</strong> Force), Koninklijke<br />

Luchtmacht (Royal Netherlands <strong>Air</strong> Force), and Flygvapnet (Swedish<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Force). <strong>The</strong> study of these four air <strong>for</strong>ces highlights the impact of<br />

profoundly different defence policies upon air power and compares<br />

NATO air <strong>for</strong>ces with a non-aligned air <strong>for</strong>ce. Within the NATO air<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces, this choice also provides a broad range. At one end of the scale<br />

is the Netherlands with its transatlantic orientation and its strong emphasis<br />

upon NATO as its most important security pillar. At the other<br />

end is France, which only recently reentered NATO’s integrated military<br />

structure. France emphasises an independent European security<br />

and defence policy, emancipated from American leadership. <strong>The</strong> air<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces selected also highlight the impact of professional and conscript<br />

armed <strong>for</strong>ces on air power. While France and the Netherlands professionalized<br />

their armed <strong>for</strong>ces in the 1990s, Germany has thus far retained<br />

conscript armed <strong>for</strong>ces with a professional core component. In<br />

July 2011, however, Germany plans to implement “its biggest military<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m in more than 50 years” and go to an all-volunteer <strong>for</strong>ce. <strong>The</strong><br />

German chancellor also agreed to reduce troops from 250,000 to<br />

185,000. 4 Sweden suspended conscription only in mid-2010, turning<br />

its armed <strong>for</strong>ces into all-volunteer <strong>for</strong>ces. Regarding the challenge of<br />

real operations, this discussion analyses air <strong>for</strong>ces that have been<br />

regularly deployed to missions abroad as well as those that have been<br />

relegated to a rather defensive stance. At one end of the scale is the<br />

FAF. During the Cold War, France was already mounting air campaigns<br />

in peripheral conflicts in Africa and elsewhere. At the other<br />

end is Sweden with its legacy of neutrality. Additionally, this study<br />

encompasses the main types of modern combat aircraft available in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!