21.09.2015 Views

The Quest for Relevant Air Power

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

268 │ ROYAL NETHERLANDS <strong>Air</strong> Force<br />

Since the Netherlands does not have the capacity to produce<br />

complete main weapon systems nationally, the RNLAF has procured<br />

its major weapon plat<strong>for</strong>ms from abroad, primarily from<br />

the United States. Buying American is in line with the Netherlands’<br />

transatlantic orientation, and it reflects the RNLAF’s combat<br />

experience in air campaigns with the USAF being the lead air<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce. While this approach makes the Netherlands dependent<br />

upon <strong>for</strong>eign suppliers, the RNLAF’s procurement policy can be<br />

directed more by combat experience than by politico-industrial<br />

aspects. Undoubtedly, this approach has benefited from shortterm<br />

bargains—such as the procurement of secondhand Chinook<br />

transport helicopters from Canada—and has enhanced the RNLAF’s<br />

combat effectiveness at relatively low costs. Yet, it does not contribute<br />

to the overarching goal of a capable European defence industrial<br />

base. Another factor contributing to the RNLAF’s outstanding<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance has been the reduction of certain key assets.<br />

<strong>The</strong> numbers of available F-16 aircraft, Patriot batteries, and<br />

Apache combat helicopters have been deliberately kept low or reduced<br />

to improve deployability of the available systems. Moreover,<br />

certain systems were completely phased out. Amongst the<br />

major GBAD systems from the Cold War era, only the Patriot has<br />

remained in service; this system also has a TBMD capability and<br />

is thus particularly suited <strong>for</strong> the current threat spectrum. Through<br />

this constant focus upon the requirements of deployed operations,<br />

the RNLAF has effectively played in the league of the major European<br />

air <strong>for</strong>ces.<br />

Notes<br />

1. Lt Gen Dick L. Berlijn, commander in chief, RNLAF, “<strong>The</strong> Significance<br />

and Evolution of <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Power</strong>: <strong>The</strong> Royal Netherlands <strong>Air</strong> Force: One Team, One<br />

Mission,” Military Technology, no. 6 (2003): 50.<br />

2. IISS, <strong>The</strong> Military Balance 2010 (Abingdon, Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire: published by<br />

Routledge <strong>for</strong> the IISS, February 2010), 149.<br />

3. John Olsen, “Effects-Based Targeting through Pre-Attack Analysis,” in<br />

RNLAF <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Symposium, 19 November 2003, 52.<br />

4. MOD, Netherlands, Defence White Paper 1991: <strong>The</strong> Netherlands Armed<br />

Forces in a Changing World, abridged version (<strong>The</strong> Hague: MOD, 1991), 6, 18.<br />

5. MOD, Netherlands, Defence Priorities Review, abridged version (<strong>The</strong><br />

Hague: MOD, 1993), 4.<br />

6. Ibid., 5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!