NRO-MOL_2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
108 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />
Sensor Development Slippage<br />
The Systems Office’s costing exercises had scarcely<br />
gotten under way when <strong>MOL</strong> officials received more bad<br />
news. On 9 December, the Eastman Kodak Company,<br />
the DORIAN sensor contractor, dispatched a letter to<br />
Gen. Martin advising that the firm would be unable to<br />
fulfill its original commitment to deliver the first optical<br />
sensor in January 1969 for a planned April 1969 first<br />
manned launch ‡ . Company officials stated they would<br />
require a 10-month extension, with delivery of the first<br />
flight optics taking place about 15 October 1969 and the<br />
first manned launch slipping to mid-January 1970.<br />
This unexpected development was discussed at a West<br />
Coast management review meeting on 20 December<br />
1965, attended by Foster, Flax, Schriever, Evans,<br />
Martin, and other officials. They decided that General<br />
Martin should immediately initiate an investigation and<br />
review of the Eastman Kodak schedule, while Dr. Foster<br />
made arrangements to travel to Rochester, N.Y. (on<br />
22 December) to discuss the problem with company<br />
executives. 7 General Schriever’s reaction was that the<br />
Air Force should not accept the new Eastman Kodak<br />
schedule “at this time.” On 30 December he suggested<br />
to Berg and Martin that, in drawing up their plans, they<br />
continue to aim for a late 1969 launch. 8<br />
They agreed, pending a detailed review of Eastman<br />
Kodak’s schedule and costs, not to accept as final the<br />
proposed schedule slippage, although Berg noted that a<br />
lengthy schedule slip would have at least one beneficial<br />
effect of nearly fitting “the constraint of FY 67 expenditures<br />
of approximately $230 million.” 9 Meanwhile, General<br />
Martin organized a committee of Special Projects<br />
officers who proceeded to Rochester (5-8 January<br />
1966) to review in some detail the company’s schedule<br />
information, the reasoning and philosophy behind it, and<br />
its physical and personnel resources. The information<br />
collected was subsequently compared with the Special<br />
Project Directorate’s several year’s experience in<br />
acquiring several unmanned reconnaissance systems.<br />
Among other things, they noted that the development time<br />
for three unmanned systems—with sensors substantially<br />
smaller than the planned DORIAN optics—ranged from<br />
19 to 33 months (from time of program go-ahead to the<br />
first fight), whereas the proposed new Eastman Kodak<br />
schedule would require 51 months (from the October<br />
1965 contract signing to the first flight in January 1970). 10<br />
On 20 January, after being briefed on the above<br />
review, Dr. Flax also travelled to Rochester to discuss<br />
the <strong>MOL</strong> sensor schedule with company officials and<br />
‡ These dates were agreed upon in July 1965 during discussions between<br />
company officials and Dr. McMillan.<br />
examine ways of compressing it to achieve an earlier<br />
launch. 11 During his conversations with these officials,<br />
Flax suggested that they consider a less conservative<br />
approach. On his return to Washington, the <strong>NRO</strong><br />
Director wired General Martin requesting he prepare at<br />
least two DORIAN schedules—one for the “baseline”<br />
Eastman Kodak proposal and the other a compressed<br />
schedule which would provide a launch “at least six<br />
months earlier.” 12<br />
On 28 January, in response to Flax’s suggestion,<br />
Eastman Kodak submitted a new DORIAN development<br />
schedule to the Directorate of Special Projects,<br />
designated Plan B. It would eliminate the prototype<br />
compatibility model flight article and accelerate delivery<br />
of the qualification model even before the latter had<br />
been completely qualified. § By taking this approach, the<br />
company stated it could deliver the first Flight Model (FM-<br />
1) in April 1969 as opposed to October 1969. However,<br />
Special Projects considered this plan undesirable from<br />
the viewpoint of “quality assurance” and it asked the firm<br />
to take another look at the schedule problem. 13<br />
Whereupon, Eastman Kodak prepared and submitted a<br />
third alternate proposal (Plan C) on 9 February. It called<br />
for delivery of FM-1 in July 1969 while still retaining<br />
the compatibility model and completing qualification<br />
model testing prior to the launch of the first flight sensor.<br />
Applying the normal delivery-to-launch time span of three<br />
months, this meant that the first “all-up” DORIAN sensor<br />
could be launched in October 1969. Company officials<br />
warned, however, that they required a prompt go-ahead<br />
on construction of essential new facilities to maintain<br />
this schedule. On 15 March, after further meetings and<br />
discussions with Special Projects personnel, the firm<br />
submitted a revised schedule which called for delivery<br />
of a Camera Optical Assembly (COA) at Rochester 37<br />
months from the day the Air Force authorized new facility<br />
construction . 14<br />
Several weeks later, however—at the <strong>MOL</strong> monthly<br />
management review meeting on 2 April 1966—Mr. John<br />
Sewell of Eastman Kodak advised there would be a new<br />
two-month slip in the delivery of the FM-1 optical system,<br />
from 15 July to 15 September 1969. He attributed this to<br />
Air Force delay in authorizing construction of facilities, the<br />
problem of acquisition of long lead items of equipment,<br />
§ The compatibility model, integrated with the Mission Module forward<br />
section and the Laboratory Vehicle, was to be used to check out interfaces and<br />
system operation. The purpose of the qualification model was to demonstrate<br />
the system’s ability to meet performance requirements in a simulated space<br />
environment.<br />
These facilities included a new steel frame building and a masonry building<br />
about 141,200 square feet to house several test chambers, plus various<br />
items of equipment. Total estimated costs of facilities and equipment was<br />
$32,500,000. [See Memo for Record (TS-DORIAN), prep by Col R. C. Randall,<br />
25 Mar 66, subj: Status on DORIAN Facilities and ASE Requirements]