26.12.2015 Views

NRO-MOL_2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />

Sensor Development Slippage<br />

The Systems Office’s costing exercises had scarcely<br />

gotten under way when <strong>MOL</strong> officials received more bad<br />

news. On 9 December, the Eastman Kodak Company,<br />

the DORIAN sensor contractor, dispatched a letter to<br />

Gen. Martin advising that the firm would be unable to<br />

fulfill its original commitment to deliver the first optical<br />

sensor in January 1969 for a planned April 1969 first<br />

manned launch ‡ . Company officials stated they would<br />

require a 10-month extension, with delivery of the first<br />

flight optics taking place about 15 October 1969 and the<br />

first manned launch slipping to mid-January 1970.<br />

This unexpected development was discussed at a West<br />

Coast management review meeting on 20 December<br />

1965, attended by Foster, Flax, Schriever, Evans,<br />

Martin, and other officials. They decided that General<br />

Martin should immediately initiate an investigation and<br />

review of the Eastman Kodak schedule, while Dr. Foster<br />

made arrangements to travel to Rochester, N.Y. (on<br />

22 December) to discuss the problem with company<br />

executives. 7 General Schriever’s reaction was that the<br />

Air Force should not accept the new Eastman Kodak<br />

schedule “at this time.” On 30 December he suggested<br />

to Berg and Martin that, in drawing up their plans, they<br />

continue to aim for a late 1969 launch. 8<br />

They agreed, pending a detailed review of Eastman<br />

Kodak’s schedule and costs, not to accept as final the<br />

proposed schedule slippage, although Berg noted that a<br />

lengthy schedule slip would have at least one beneficial<br />

effect of nearly fitting “the constraint of FY 67 expenditures<br />

of approximately $230 million.” 9 Meanwhile, General<br />

Martin organized a committee of Special Projects<br />

officers who proceeded to Rochester (5-8 January<br />

1966) to review in some detail the company’s schedule<br />

information, the reasoning and philosophy behind it, and<br />

its physical and personnel resources. The information<br />

collected was subsequently compared with the Special<br />

Project Directorate’s several year’s experience in<br />

acquiring several unmanned reconnaissance systems.<br />

Among other things, they noted that the development time<br />

for three unmanned systems—with sensors substantially<br />

smaller than the planned DORIAN optics—ranged from<br />

19 to 33 months (from time of program go-ahead to the<br />

first fight), whereas the proposed new Eastman Kodak<br />

schedule would require 51 months (from the October<br />

1965 contract signing to the first flight in January 1970). 10<br />

On 20 January, after being briefed on the above<br />

review, Dr. Flax also travelled to Rochester to discuss<br />

the <strong>MOL</strong> sensor schedule with company officials and<br />

‡ These dates were agreed upon in July 1965 during discussions between<br />

company officials and Dr. McMillan.<br />

examine ways of compressing it to achieve an earlier<br />

launch. 11 During his conversations with these officials,<br />

Flax suggested that they consider a less conservative<br />

approach. On his return to Washington, the <strong>NRO</strong><br />

Director wired General Martin requesting he prepare at<br />

least two DORIAN schedules—one for the “baseline”<br />

Eastman Kodak proposal and the other a compressed<br />

schedule which would provide a launch “at least six<br />

months earlier.” 12<br />

On 28 January, in response to Flax’s suggestion,<br />

Eastman Kodak submitted a new DORIAN development<br />

schedule to the Directorate of Special Projects,<br />

designated Plan B. It would eliminate the prototype<br />

compatibility model flight article and accelerate delivery<br />

of the qualification model even before the latter had<br />

been completely qualified. § By taking this approach, the<br />

company stated it could deliver the first Flight Model (FM-<br />

1) in April 1969 as opposed to October 1969. However,<br />

Special Projects considered this plan undesirable from<br />

the viewpoint of “quality assurance” and it asked the firm<br />

to take another look at the schedule problem. 13<br />

Whereupon, Eastman Kodak prepared and submitted a<br />

third alternate proposal (Plan C) on 9 February. It called<br />

for delivery of FM-1 in July 1969 while still retaining<br />

the compatibility model and completing qualification<br />

model testing prior to the launch of the first flight sensor.<br />

Applying the normal delivery-to-launch time span of three<br />

months, this meant that the first “all-up” DORIAN sensor<br />

could be launched in October 1969. Company officials<br />

warned, however, that they required a prompt go-ahead<br />

on construction of essential new facilities to maintain<br />

this schedule. On 15 March, after further meetings and<br />

discussions with Special Projects personnel, the firm<br />

submitted a revised schedule which called for delivery<br />

of a Camera Optical Assembly (COA) at Rochester 37<br />

months from the day the Air Force authorized new facility<br />

construction . 14<br />

Several weeks later, however—at the <strong>MOL</strong> monthly<br />

management review meeting on 2 April 1966—Mr. John<br />

Sewell of Eastman Kodak advised there would be a new<br />

two-month slip in the delivery of the FM-1 optical system,<br />

from 15 July to 15 September 1969. He attributed this to<br />

Air Force delay in authorizing construction of facilities, the<br />

problem of acquisition of long lead items of equipment,<br />

§ The compatibility model, integrated with the Mission Module forward<br />

section and the Laboratory Vehicle, was to be used to check out interfaces and<br />

system operation. The purpose of the qualification model was to demonstrate<br />

the system’s ability to meet performance requirements in a simulated space<br />

environment.<br />

These facilities included a new steel frame building and a masonry building<br />

about 141,200 square feet to house several test chambers, plus various<br />

items of equipment. Total estimated costs of facilities and equipment was<br />

$32,500,000. [See Memo for Record (TS-DORIAN), prep by Col R. C. Randall,<br />

25 Mar 66, subj: Status on DORIAN Facilities and ASE Requirements]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!