NRO-MOL_2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter XIII - AIR FORCE/NASA COORDINATION<br />
131<br />
In early April General Evans prepared a counterproposal<br />
for NASA’s consideration. In forwarding the<br />
document to Mueller’s deputy, Brig Gen David Jones,<br />
on 8 April, Evans said he believed it would minimize<br />
interference between the two Gemini projects, while<br />
assuring that the management of the highly integrated<br />
Gemini B/<strong>MOL</strong> system remained with the Air Force.<br />
According to this plan, NASA’s Gemini Project Office—<br />
located at the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC),<br />
Houston, Tex.—would be assigned full responsibility for<br />
modifying and refurbishing Gemini spacecraft required<br />
for <strong>MOL</strong> early test flights. On the other hand, the Air Force<br />
would retain responsibility for contracting, development,<br />
and acquisition of Gemini B. 9<br />
This compromise was accepted by the space agency. On<br />
12 April, Drs. Seamans and Hall formally agreed the Air<br />
Force should proceed to negotiate the Gemini B contract<br />
with McDonnell. In light of this agreement, DDB&E<br />
wrote to Seamans to solicit suggestions “of technical or<br />
management methods” which could help DoD reduce<br />
Gemini B acquisition costs. Schriever followed up during<br />
a meeting with Mueller on 13 April. As a matter of policy,<br />
he said, the Air Force wanted and needed all the NASA<br />
technical help it could get, particularly in connection<br />
with refurbishment of the Gemini 2 spacecraft and other<br />
equipment for use in the <strong>MOL</strong> test flight program. 10<br />
During the next several days, Generals Evans and<br />
Jones worked out the details of the responsibilities of<br />
the two agencies. In their preliminary draft agreement,<br />
the Air Force assigned to NASA the responsibility for<br />
engineering, contract management, and procurement<br />
associated with refurbishment and modification of the<br />
GT-2 spacecraft and Static Article #4. The Air Force also<br />
agreed to provide several highly qualified personnel to<br />
participate in the above work. As for Gemini B, the Air<br />
Force alone would be responsible for its acquisition and<br />
would contract directly with McDonnell. 11<br />
A final, revised agreement—incorporating the major<br />
points agreed upon above—was signed on 21 April 1966<br />
by Dr. Mueller for NASA and General Ritland for the Air<br />
Force. Simultaneously, the Manned Spacecraft Center<br />
designated Mr. Paul E. Purser as its main contact for<br />
NASA policy matters relating to <strong>MOL</strong> and Mr. Duncan R.<br />
Collins of the Gemini Spacecraft Office as the point of<br />
contact “for all technical assistance provided to the <strong>MOL</strong><br />
Program. § ” 12 Lt Col Richard C. Henry, USAF—assigned<br />
to NASA’s Gemini Program Control Office at Houston—<br />
was named the Air Force’s contact “for matters relating<br />
§ The space agency later assigned two employees at McDonnell to work<br />
full-time on the Gemini B.<br />
to the transfer of materiel and equipment to the <strong>MOL</strong><br />
program and for all matters pertaining to the HSQ (Heat<br />
Shield Qualification) program.”<br />
With this agreement the issue was resolved and the Air<br />
Force took steps to negotiate a Gemini B engineering<br />
definition contract with McDonnell. OSD provided seven<br />
million dollars for this work; the final contract, signed in<br />
May 1965, totaled $6,784,000.<br />
Turnover of NASA Equipment<br />
After the President announced the Air Force would<br />
proceed with <strong>MOL</strong>, Dr. Seamans wrote to OSD on 23<br />
September 1965 to offer again NASA’s full support to<br />
the new program. His agency believed, he said, that “an<br />
experimental manned space flight program under the<br />
military” was justified and it was prepared to undertake<br />
joint planning “for the maximum practicable utilization by<br />
DoD of the NASA developed hardware and technology,<br />
our production, testing, processing facilities, and our<br />
management and operational experience.” 13 Seamans’<br />
helpful offer was made against the background of<br />
three spectacularly successful NASA Gemini flights.<br />
On 23 March Gemini 3 was successfully launched, its<br />
astronauts achieving an important space “first” when they<br />
changed their orbit three times. Gemini 4, launched on 3<br />
June, also made space history when Astronaut Edward<br />
H. White “walked in space” for 20 minutes and used a<br />
propulsion gun for the first time. Gemini 5, launched<br />
into an eight-day flight on 21 August 1965, shattered all<br />
existing space endurance records.<br />
The newly formed <strong>MOL</strong> Program Office pursued the<br />
subject of turn- over of various items of Gemini equipment<br />
to the Air Force. After it had reviewed the subject,<br />
NASA on 4 October requested the Air Force to submit<br />
a complete list of all Gemini-associated equipment it<br />
needed for the <strong>MOL</strong>. This task was passed on to the <strong>MOL</strong><br />
Systems Office, which by the end of October 1965 had<br />
compiled a list of items desired, including Gemini training<br />
boilerplates, flotation collars, mission simulators (one<br />
each located at Cape Kennedy and the Houston Center),<br />
crew station mock-ups and engineering mock-ups.<br />
On 8 November General Evans forwarded the list to<br />
NASA and suggested the space agency designate a<br />
Houston official to work out details of the turnover with<br />
General Berg’s representatives. On 29 November, after<br />
his staff had reviewed the items listed, Mueller directed<br />
Dr. Robert S. Gilruth, head of the Manned Spacecraft<br />
Center, to immediately transfer to the Air Force one<br />
Gemini training boilerplate, three Gemini flotation collars,<br />
Spacecraft Article #3, and Spacecraft #3A. He also