26.12.2015 Views

NRO-MOL_2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />

Figure 10. Mercury Mark II<br />

Source: CSNR Reference Collection<br />

In January 1961 the contractors submitted preliminary<br />

reports to the Air Force, describing their progress in<br />

defining designs for an MTSS, and in February they made<br />

oral presentations to a USAF-sponsored conference. Later<br />

the Aeronautical Systems Division, with the help of other<br />

Air Force agencies, evaluated the interim reports and,<br />

on the basis of their comments, a design was developed<br />

for a relatively simple space station. ASD proposed a<br />

development which would lead to the launching of a threeman<br />

ballistic capsule plus a module or station where the<br />

crew would live and function for a period of up to 30 days.<br />

The ASD concept called for the station to be abandoned<br />

when the time came for the crew to return to earth in its<br />

capsule. ASD’s preliminary evaluation was submitted<br />

on 30 April 1961 to the newly-formed Air Force Systems<br />

Command (AFSC), successor to ARDC. 16<br />

By early July the six contractors had completed their<br />

studies and submitted final reports. Their conclusions<br />

were sufficiently encouraging for Headquarters USAF<br />

in mid-July to establish the MTSS as an active project<br />

under its newly-organized Directorate of Advanced<br />

Technology. A month later, on 16 August 1961, the Air<br />

Force submitted a Program Package VI element to OSD<br />

requesting an allocation of $5 million in fiscal year 1963<br />

to begin space station studies. When OSD’s budget<br />

guidelines were released in September, however, the<br />

proposed USAF project was left unfunded. A reclama<br />

was subsequently rejected. 17<br />

Meanwhile, representatives of the Air Staff, six major<br />

USAF commands, several AFSC divisions, and the<br />

RAND and Aerospace Corporations, attended a final<br />

MTSS evaluation conference on 12-15 September.<br />

They reviewed the contractors’ reports and agreed<br />

that, while the individual designs differed in detail, all<br />

emphasized the importance of orbital rendezvous, not<br />

only for supply purposes but also to initially activate the<br />

station. The conference recognized that, because the Air<br />

Force lacked basic data on man’s ability to perform for<br />

long periods under conditions of Zero G and knowledge<br />

about the problems of space rendezvous, ‡‡ it would be<br />

extremely difficult to proceed with a satisfactory MTSS<br />

design. They saw some hope of acquiring the necessary<br />

information from NASA’s newest man-in-space project<br />

(originally called Mercury Mark II, later re-designated<br />

Gemini), one of whose major objectives was to achieve<br />

and demonstrate orbital rendezvous. 18<br />

‡‡ Only two men, Soviet cosmonauts Yuri Gagarin and Gherman Titov, had<br />

flown in orbit by September 1961. Titov’s flight lasted 25.3 hours. When the<br />

Russians finally released some data on these flights, they indicated Titov<br />

became disoriented. And, of course, the first orbital rendezvous between two<br />

space vehicles was still some years off.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!