26.12.2015 Views

NRO-MOL_2015

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />

The results of the above simulations were briefed to<br />

the Reconnaissance Panel of the President’s Science<br />

Advisory Committee (PSAC) on 21 October 1964. Among<br />

those in attendance, besides Prof. E. M. Purcell, Panel<br />

Chairman, were: Drs. Hornig, E. H. Land, H. F. York<br />

(formerly DDR&E), N.F. Golovin, D. H. Steininger, Prof.<br />

Sidney Drell, and Mr. Willis Shapley, a representative of<br />

the Bureau of the Budget.<br />

After this briefing, Professor Drell was dispatched to<br />

Lockheed on 11 November to get a first-hand look at<br />

the equipment used for the simulations. Over a fourhour<br />

period, he was given a complete briefing and<br />

demonstration together with some operational time in<br />

the simulator. He emerged from the session apparently<br />

convinced that the numbers which had been reported<br />

to the Panel as representing man’s ability were indeed<br />

valid and that the pilot was consistently performing the<br />

IMC task to an order of magnitude better than results<br />

obtained from existing unmanned systems. 24<br />

As the “black” studies and simulations contributed to<br />

the decision to proceed with <strong>MOL</strong>, so did the conclusions<br />

of the various “white” study contractors, whose pre-<br />

Phase I reports began flowing into the Air Force late in<br />

the year. Copies also were made available, at DDR&E<br />

request, to the Institute of Defense Analysis (IDA) for<br />

review and evaluation. 25<br />

An analysis of the studies and reports of simulation test it<br />

received led SSD to conclude that the basic <strong>MOL</strong> concept<br />

and the value of employing man to perform specific military<br />

tasks in space had been confirmed. It reported that the<br />

results of studies of <strong>MOL</strong> experiments P-1, -2, and -3 and<br />

contractor simulation tests demonstrated “that man can<br />

accomplish IMC to better than .2% consistently and was<br />

limited only by the quality and magnification of the optics<br />

and the inherent stability of the vehicle.” Extensive B-47<br />

flights conducted with a modified bombsight and using<br />

two cameras also had verified that man had the ability<br />

“to acquire unknown targets as small as trucks and trains<br />

and make an accurate count of the total present.” 26<br />

In the area of electromagnetic signal detection, a test<br />

employing a KC-135 confirmed that man was able to<br />

discriminate false alarm signals, select signal bands<br />

of interest, and assess and classify the signals within<br />

seconds after receipt. Tests to determine in-space<br />

maintenance (Experiment P-5) capabilities, using the Air<br />

Force’s zero “g” KC-155 and submersible tests, proved<br />

that man had “the inherent potential to accomplish any<br />

level of maintenance and repair conceivable, being<br />

constrained only by the time available, the fineness of<br />

the task, and the presence of a pressurized suit.”<br />

The Division reported other test and study results were<br />

equally encouraging. During exercises in the zero “g” KC-<br />

135, it was demonstrated that man could stabilize and<br />

Maneuver himself in AMU and similarly could effectively<br />

operate an RMU by TV or direct viewing (Experiments<br />

P-6 and -7). In the autonomous navigation and geodesy<br />

area (Experiment P-8), simulations were performed<br />

which indicated that, with small fields of view, man<br />

could acquire and point at identifiable landmarks within<br />

15 arc seconds. In another experiment (P-10) involving<br />

multiband spectral observations, four men operating<br />

radiometric and calibration instruments and automatic<br />

trackers installed in a KC-135 demonstrated their ability<br />

to calibrate, point, monitor displays, change plans, and<br />

assist in data interpretation. 27<br />

The IDA review and assessment of the pre-Phase<br />

I studies also tended to support the basic validity of<br />

the <strong>MOL</strong> concept. IDA reported, among other things,<br />

that there appeared to be no known insurmountable<br />

problems to providing life support and environment<br />

control systems for 30-45 days and that attitude control<br />

systems for specified attitude holding and slewing of<br />

the <strong>MOL</strong> were within the technological state of the art.<br />

It also concluded that the ground support network for<br />

<strong>MOL</strong> appeared adequate but only for initial flights (other<br />

facilities would be needed for <strong>MOL</strong> follow-on systems)<br />

and that the three OSS studies contained “general<br />

operational concepts of value” to the <strong>MOL</strong> project. 28<br />

In a separate analysis of the simulation aspects of the<br />

<strong>MOL</strong> experiments, IDA reported that many aerospace<br />

firms had installed equipment to simulate the critical<br />

photo reconnaissance mission. Their preliminary results,<br />

IDA said, indicated that “man will be able to contribute<br />

to the task of pointing a high resolution camera and<br />

tracking a target with the rate accuracy of -3 arc/sec<br />

necessary to achieve very high resolution photography<br />

(-1ft).” However, IDA cautioned that important inputs<br />

such as stabilization and attitude control parameters<br />

and realistic navigation errors needed to be included<br />

in the simulations before final conclusions could be<br />

reached about system tracking accuracy. 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!