NRO-MOL_2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
56 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />
The results of the above simulations were briefed to<br />
the Reconnaissance Panel of the President’s Science<br />
Advisory Committee (PSAC) on 21 October 1964. Among<br />
those in attendance, besides Prof. E. M. Purcell, Panel<br />
Chairman, were: Drs. Hornig, E. H. Land, H. F. York<br />
(formerly DDR&E), N.F. Golovin, D. H. Steininger, Prof.<br />
Sidney Drell, and Mr. Willis Shapley, a representative of<br />
the Bureau of the Budget.<br />
After this briefing, Professor Drell was dispatched to<br />
Lockheed on 11 November to get a first-hand look at<br />
the equipment used for the simulations. Over a fourhour<br />
period, he was given a complete briefing and<br />
demonstration together with some operational time in<br />
the simulator. He emerged from the session apparently<br />
convinced that the numbers which had been reported<br />
to the Panel as representing man’s ability were indeed<br />
valid and that the pilot was consistently performing the<br />
IMC task to an order of magnitude better than results<br />
obtained from existing unmanned systems. 24<br />
As the “black” studies and simulations contributed to<br />
the decision to proceed with <strong>MOL</strong>, so did the conclusions<br />
of the various “white” study contractors, whose pre-<br />
Phase I reports began flowing into the Air Force late in<br />
the year. Copies also were made available, at DDR&E<br />
request, to the Institute of Defense Analysis (IDA) for<br />
review and evaluation. 25<br />
An analysis of the studies and reports of simulation test it<br />
received led SSD to conclude that the basic <strong>MOL</strong> concept<br />
and the value of employing man to perform specific military<br />
tasks in space had been confirmed. It reported that the<br />
results of studies of <strong>MOL</strong> experiments P-1, -2, and -3 and<br />
contractor simulation tests demonstrated “that man can<br />
accomplish IMC to better than .2% consistently and was<br />
limited only by the quality and magnification of the optics<br />
and the inherent stability of the vehicle.” Extensive B-47<br />
flights conducted with a modified bombsight and using<br />
two cameras also had verified that man had the ability<br />
“to acquire unknown targets as small as trucks and trains<br />
and make an accurate count of the total present.” 26<br />
In the area of electromagnetic signal detection, a test<br />
employing a KC-135 confirmed that man was able to<br />
discriminate false alarm signals, select signal bands<br />
of interest, and assess and classify the signals within<br />
seconds after receipt. Tests to determine in-space<br />
maintenance (Experiment P-5) capabilities, using the Air<br />
Force’s zero “g” KC-155 and submersible tests, proved<br />
that man had “the inherent potential to accomplish any<br />
level of maintenance and repair conceivable, being<br />
constrained only by the time available, the fineness of<br />
the task, and the presence of a pressurized suit.”<br />
The Division reported other test and study results were<br />
equally encouraging. During exercises in the zero “g” KC-<br />
135, it was demonstrated that man could stabilize and<br />
Maneuver himself in AMU and similarly could effectively<br />
operate an RMU by TV or direct viewing (Experiments<br />
P-6 and -7). In the autonomous navigation and geodesy<br />
area (Experiment P-8), simulations were performed<br />
which indicated that, with small fields of view, man<br />
could acquire and point at identifiable landmarks within<br />
15 arc seconds. In another experiment (P-10) involving<br />
multiband spectral observations, four men operating<br />
radiometric and calibration instruments and automatic<br />
trackers installed in a KC-135 demonstrated their ability<br />
to calibrate, point, monitor displays, change plans, and<br />
assist in data interpretation. 27<br />
The IDA review and assessment of the pre-Phase<br />
I studies also tended to support the basic validity of<br />
the <strong>MOL</strong> concept. IDA reported, among other things,<br />
that there appeared to be no known insurmountable<br />
problems to providing life support and environment<br />
control systems for 30-45 days and that attitude control<br />
systems for specified attitude holding and slewing of<br />
the <strong>MOL</strong> were within the technological state of the art.<br />
It also concluded that the ground support network for<br />
<strong>MOL</strong> appeared adequate but only for initial flights (other<br />
facilities would be needed for <strong>MOL</strong> follow-on systems)<br />
and that the three OSS studies contained “general<br />
operational concepts of value” to the <strong>MOL</strong> project. 28<br />
In a separate analysis of the simulation aspects of the<br />
<strong>MOL</strong> experiments, IDA reported that many aerospace<br />
firms had installed equipment to simulate the critical<br />
photo reconnaissance mission. Their preliminary results,<br />
IDA said, indicated that “man will be able to contribute<br />
to the task of pointing a high resolution camera and<br />
tracking a target with the rate accuracy of -3 arc/sec<br />
necessary to achieve very high resolution photography<br />
(-1ft).” However, IDA cautioned that important inputs<br />
such as stabilization and attitude control parameters<br />
and realistic navigation errors needed to be included<br />
in the simulations before final conclusions could be<br />
reached about system tracking accuracy. 29