NRO-MOL_2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter XV - THE PROJECT TERMINATED<br />
163<br />
AFB launch facility was to be completed “to the minimum<br />
practical extent and mothballed” but other construction<br />
was to be halted as soon as possible. Since a public<br />
announcement was to be made on 10 June, after<br />
Congress was notified, Stewart directed Bleymaier to<br />
withhold information from the Systems Office staff until<br />
the close of the work day, Monday, 9 June. 42<br />
Meanwhile, Col Ralph J. Ford and Lt Col Robert<br />
Hermann of the <strong>MOL</strong> Program Office staff—working with<br />
OSD personnel completed a series of announcements<br />
connected with the President’s decision. These included<br />
a press release on <strong>MOL</strong>’s cancellation, sample questions<br />
and answers for the press, classified and unclassified<br />
letters to chairmen of key congressional committees,<br />
etc. A “termination scenario’’ was worked up as follows:<br />
(1) affected government officials would be notified<br />
informally; (2) former President Johnson and Secretaries<br />
McNamara, Zuckert, and Brown would be notified; (3)<br />
chairmen of congressional committees and individual<br />
congressmen whose states would be affected would<br />
be informed; (4) <strong>MOL</strong> contractors would be directed<br />
to terminate all efforts except covert camera activities<br />
applicable to an unmanned system. After these steps<br />
were taken, a press release might be distributed and a<br />
news conference held, if desired. 43<br />
On 9 June Packard formally directed Dr. Seamans to:<br />
...terminate the <strong>MOL</strong> Program except<br />
for those camera system elements<br />
useful for incorporation into an<br />
unmanned satellite system optimized<br />
to use the Titan IIID. Directions to<br />
<strong>MOL</strong> contractors should be issued on<br />
Tuesday morning, June 10, at which<br />
time we will also notify the Congress<br />
and make a public statement that <strong>MOL</strong><br />
is cancelled.<br />
Close-out costs for <strong>MOL</strong>, which I<br />
understand are approximately $75<br />
million more than is now available to<br />
the <strong>MOL</strong> Program, should be included<br />
in the unclassified FY 70 Air Force<br />
budget. An additional $175 million<br />
should be included in classified NRP<br />
portions of the FY 70 Air Force<br />
budget. This will provide for<br />
development of the camera system at<br />
a reduced pace, for competition for<br />
a new spacecraft, and for possible<br />
initiation of system development<br />
late in FY 70.<br />
All future work on the camera and<br />
an unmanned system will be part of<br />
the NRP. As a security measure,<br />
appropriate elements of the <strong>MOL</strong><br />
Project offices and the camera system<br />
contracts should be transferred to<br />
the Air Force NRP Special Projects<br />
Offices at an early date. Overt <strong>MOL</strong><br />
activities should be phased out in<br />
conjunction with the closeout of <strong>MOL</strong><br />
Program activities... 44<br />
The next day the classified and unclassified letters<br />
were delivered to key Senators and Representatives<br />
and, shortly after, Packard announced the termination to<br />
the press. On Capitol Hill, Secretary Laird told several<br />
Congressional committees that, “with the President’s<br />
concurrence,” he had decided to cancel <strong>MOL</strong>. He listed<br />
several reasons for the decision, including the need<br />
“to either drastically cut back or terminate numerous<br />
small but important efforts or one of the larger, more<br />
costly programs.” Laird stated that “major advances<br />
have been made by both NASA and DoD in automated<br />
techniques for unmanned satellite systems...These have<br />
given us confidence that the most essential Department<br />
of Defense space missions can be accomplished with<br />
lower cost unmanned spacecraft.” He also said:<br />
I wish to make two final points for<br />
the record. It should be clearly<br />
understood that termination is not<br />
in any sense an unfavorable reflection<br />
on <strong>MOL</strong> contractors. They have all<br />
worked very hard and have achieved<br />
excellent results. Likewise, <strong>MOL</strong><br />
termination should not be construed as<br />
a reflection on the Air Force. The <strong>MOL</strong><br />
goals were practical and achievable.<br />
Maximum advantage was being taken of<br />
hardware and experience from NASA<br />
and other Department of Defense<br />
projects, and the program was well<br />
managed and good progress was being<br />
made. Under other circumstances, the<br />
continuance would have been fully<br />
justified. 45<br />
Few regrets were voiced in Congress over the <strong>MOL</strong><br />
decision. One Senator—Cannon of Nevada—was<br />
unhappy, however, and complained he had difficulty<br />
understanding “the logic of the Department of Defense.”<br />
In one breath, he said, OSD officials claimed the United<br />
States was in the greatest mortal battle for survival—“<br />
a danger beyond any confrontation in our entire history