26.12.2015 Views

NRO-MOL_2015

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter XV - THE PROJECT TERMINATED<br />

163<br />

AFB launch facility was to be completed “to the minimum<br />

practical extent and mothballed” but other construction<br />

was to be halted as soon as possible. Since a public<br />

announcement was to be made on 10 June, after<br />

Congress was notified, Stewart directed Bleymaier to<br />

withhold information from the Systems Office staff until<br />

the close of the work day, Monday, 9 June. 42<br />

Meanwhile, Col Ralph J. Ford and Lt Col Robert<br />

Hermann of the <strong>MOL</strong> Program Office staff—working with<br />

OSD personnel completed a series of announcements<br />

connected with the President’s decision. These included<br />

a press release on <strong>MOL</strong>’s cancellation, sample questions<br />

and answers for the press, classified and unclassified<br />

letters to chairmen of key congressional committees,<br />

etc. A “termination scenario’’ was worked up as follows:<br />

(1) affected government officials would be notified<br />

informally; (2) former President Johnson and Secretaries<br />

McNamara, Zuckert, and Brown would be notified; (3)<br />

chairmen of congressional committees and individual<br />

congressmen whose states would be affected would<br />

be informed; (4) <strong>MOL</strong> contractors would be directed<br />

to terminate all efforts except covert camera activities<br />

applicable to an unmanned system. After these steps<br />

were taken, a press release might be distributed and a<br />

news conference held, if desired. 43<br />

On 9 June Packard formally directed Dr. Seamans to:<br />

...terminate the <strong>MOL</strong> Program except<br />

for those camera system elements<br />

useful for incorporation into an<br />

unmanned satellite system optimized<br />

to use the Titan IIID. Directions to<br />

<strong>MOL</strong> contractors should be issued on<br />

Tuesday morning, June 10, at which<br />

time we will also notify the Congress<br />

and make a public statement that <strong>MOL</strong><br />

is cancelled.<br />

Close-out costs for <strong>MOL</strong>, which I<br />

understand are approximately $75<br />

million more than is now available to<br />

the <strong>MOL</strong> Program, should be included<br />

in the unclassified FY 70 Air Force<br />

budget. An additional $175 million<br />

should be included in classified NRP<br />

portions of the FY 70 Air Force<br />

budget. This will provide for<br />

development of the camera system at<br />

a reduced pace, for competition for<br />

a new spacecraft, and for possible<br />

initiation of system development<br />

late in FY 70.<br />

All future work on the camera and<br />

an unmanned system will be part of<br />

the NRP. As a security measure,<br />

appropriate elements of the <strong>MOL</strong><br />

Project offices and the camera system<br />

contracts should be transferred to<br />

the Air Force NRP Special Projects<br />

Offices at an early date. Overt <strong>MOL</strong><br />

activities should be phased out in<br />

conjunction with the closeout of <strong>MOL</strong><br />

Program activities... 44<br />

The next day the classified and unclassified letters<br />

were delivered to key Senators and Representatives<br />

and, shortly after, Packard announced the termination to<br />

the press. On Capitol Hill, Secretary Laird told several<br />

Congressional committees that, “with the President’s<br />

concurrence,” he had decided to cancel <strong>MOL</strong>. He listed<br />

several reasons for the decision, including the need<br />

“to either drastically cut back or terminate numerous<br />

small but important efforts or one of the larger, more<br />

costly programs.” Laird stated that “major advances<br />

have been made by both NASA and DoD in automated<br />

techniques for unmanned satellite systems...These have<br />

given us confidence that the most essential Department<br />

of Defense space missions can be accomplished with<br />

lower cost unmanned spacecraft.” He also said:<br />

I wish to make two final points for<br />

the record. It should be clearly<br />

understood that termination is not<br />

in any sense an unfavorable reflection<br />

on <strong>MOL</strong> contractors. They have all<br />

worked very hard and have achieved<br />

excellent results. Likewise, <strong>MOL</strong><br />

termination should not be construed as<br />

a reflection on the Air Force. The <strong>MOL</strong><br />

goals were practical and achievable.<br />

Maximum advantage was being taken of<br />

hardware and experience from NASA<br />

and other Department of Defense<br />

projects, and the program was well<br />

managed and good progress was being<br />

made. Under other circumstances, the<br />

continuance would have been fully<br />

justified. 45<br />

Few regrets were voiced in Congress over the <strong>MOL</strong><br />

decision. One Senator—Cannon of Nevada—was<br />

unhappy, however, and complained he had difficulty<br />

understanding “the logic of the Department of Defense.”<br />

In one breath, he said, OSD officials claimed the United<br />

States was in the greatest mortal battle for survival—“<br />

a danger beyond any confrontation in our entire history

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!