26.12.2015 Views

NRO-MOL_2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />

understandings had been reached so that the Secretary<br />

of Defense should “provide authoritative guidance to the<br />

USAF to pursue the next phase of effort.” 22<br />

On 9 March Dr. Eugene Fubini, Deputy DDR&E,<br />

forwarded a copy of the Hall-Augenstein report to<br />

McMillan. He reminded the Under Secretary that a list<br />

of proposed <strong>MOL</strong> experiments, together with a brief<br />

statement of their military and/or scientific value, was<br />

required by OSD before it would approve the project. 23<br />

In March 1964 there was still another group which<br />

recommended that manned space reconnaissance be<br />

pursued. A panel of Project Forecast, established the<br />

previous spring by Secretary Zuckert and General LeMay<br />

with General Schriever as its Director, declared that the<br />

areas of most promise for manned reconnaissance<br />

were “those of high resolution photography, infrared<br />

imagery, and the all-weather capabilities of the synthetic<br />

array side-looking radar.” The panel estimated that high<br />

resolution camera systems could be built within a few<br />

years that would “yield ground resolutions of less than<br />

{one foot}. It believed the systems could be enhanced<br />

by using man to point at the proper targets and adjust for<br />

image motion compensation. 24<br />

With the consensus being that the reconnaissance<br />

mission should be given the main emphasis in the <strong>MOL</strong><br />

program, Dr. McMillan in early March met with General<br />

Schriever to clarify future approaches to the proposed<br />

pre-Phase I studies. The two men agreed that certain<br />

overt experiments related to reconnaissance would<br />

attempt “to determine man’s capability, with appropriate<br />

aids, to point an instrument with accuracy better than ½<br />

mile, to adjust for image motion to better than 0.2 percent,<br />

and to focus precisely (if this is necessary).” McMillan<br />

agreed that these activities could be classified under the<br />

normal security system (as “secret”) and simply stated as<br />

objectives without indicating to contractors or others how<br />

they might compare with existing or projected unmanned<br />

satellite reconnaissance projects.<br />

In a letter to Schriever sent under the <strong>NRO</strong> BYEMAN<br />

security system, McMillan further advised that the <strong>NRO</strong><br />

had initiated separate studies which would compare<br />

carefully the potential cost and performance of very<br />

high resolution systems, both manned and unmanned.<br />

He said that these studies would be kept current with<br />

the overt <strong>MOL</strong> program and that <strong>NRO</strong>’s objective would<br />

be to insure that, “at such time as the evidence from<br />

<strong>MOL</strong> experiments warrants the decision, the basis for<br />

a timely development of a manned system will be at<br />

hand.” Concerning the experimental camera, he advised<br />

that activities related to it would be handled exclusively<br />

within <strong>NRO</strong> channels and that special clearances would<br />

be given selected AFSC personnel who would be kept<br />

regularly informed of results. 26<br />

Meanwhile, the <strong>NRO</strong> announced formal guidelines for<br />

its covert studies, being performed under the code name<br />

“DORIAN.” It stated that the studies and any subsequent<br />

hardware activities which were directed toward<br />

development of “an actual reconnaissance capability for<br />

the Department of Defense’s manned orbiting laboratory<br />

are under the sole direction and control of the (S) National<br />

Reconnaissance Office and are part of the (TS) National<br />

Reconnaissance Program.” Normal military security<br />

would apply to other <strong>MOL</strong> study activities conducted<br />

outside Project DORIAN. The fact that certain actual<br />

reconnaissance studies were under way for application<br />

to <strong>MOL</strong>, and the existence and participation of <strong>NRO</strong>, etc.,<br />

were to be considered extremely sensitive and required<br />

handling under the BYEMAN security system. 27<br />

He recommended use of a telescopic system for<br />

the pointing, image motion compensation, and focus<br />

experiments. Pointing accuracy could be recorded with<br />

a simple collimated camera of resolution easily available<br />

from unclassified equipment. IMC performance could<br />

be recorded by photographing stars or by use of long<br />

exposures. He agreed that photography of the quality<br />

approaching that needed for reconnaissance might be<br />

undertaken on some orbital flights. An experimental<br />

camera held under special security (an F/16 camera<br />

with 240” focal length) might be made available as<br />

government-furnished equipment. 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!