NRO-MOL_2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
40 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />
understandings had been reached so that the Secretary<br />
of Defense should “provide authoritative guidance to the<br />
USAF to pursue the next phase of effort.” 22<br />
On 9 March Dr. Eugene Fubini, Deputy DDR&E,<br />
forwarded a copy of the Hall-Augenstein report to<br />
McMillan. He reminded the Under Secretary that a list<br />
of proposed <strong>MOL</strong> experiments, together with a brief<br />
statement of their military and/or scientific value, was<br />
required by OSD before it would approve the project. 23<br />
In March 1964 there was still another group which<br />
recommended that manned space reconnaissance be<br />
pursued. A panel of Project Forecast, established the<br />
previous spring by Secretary Zuckert and General LeMay<br />
with General Schriever as its Director, declared that the<br />
areas of most promise for manned reconnaissance<br />
were “those of high resolution photography, infrared<br />
imagery, and the all-weather capabilities of the synthetic<br />
array side-looking radar.” The panel estimated that high<br />
resolution camera systems could be built within a few<br />
years that would “yield ground resolutions of less than<br />
{one foot}. It believed the systems could be enhanced<br />
by using man to point at the proper targets and adjust for<br />
image motion compensation. 24<br />
With the consensus being that the reconnaissance<br />
mission should be given the main emphasis in the <strong>MOL</strong><br />
program, Dr. McMillan in early March met with General<br />
Schriever to clarify future approaches to the proposed<br />
pre-Phase I studies. The two men agreed that certain<br />
overt experiments related to reconnaissance would<br />
attempt “to determine man’s capability, with appropriate<br />
aids, to point an instrument with accuracy better than ½<br />
mile, to adjust for image motion to better than 0.2 percent,<br />
and to focus precisely (if this is necessary).” McMillan<br />
agreed that these activities could be classified under the<br />
normal security system (as “secret”) and simply stated as<br />
objectives without indicating to contractors or others how<br />
they might compare with existing or projected unmanned<br />
satellite reconnaissance projects.<br />
In a letter to Schriever sent under the <strong>NRO</strong> BYEMAN<br />
security system, McMillan further advised that the <strong>NRO</strong><br />
had initiated separate studies which would compare<br />
carefully the potential cost and performance of very<br />
high resolution systems, both manned and unmanned.<br />
He said that these studies would be kept current with<br />
the overt <strong>MOL</strong> program and that <strong>NRO</strong>’s objective would<br />
be to insure that, “at such time as the evidence from<br />
<strong>MOL</strong> experiments warrants the decision, the basis for<br />
a timely development of a manned system will be at<br />
hand.” Concerning the experimental camera, he advised<br />
that activities related to it would be handled exclusively<br />
within <strong>NRO</strong> channels and that special clearances would<br />
be given selected AFSC personnel who would be kept<br />
regularly informed of results. 26<br />
Meanwhile, the <strong>NRO</strong> announced formal guidelines for<br />
its covert studies, being performed under the code name<br />
“DORIAN.” It stated that the studies and any subsequent<br />
hardware activities which were directed toward<br />
development of “an actual reconnaissance capability for<br />
the Department of Defense’s manned orbiting laboratory<br />
are under the sole direction and control of the (S) National<br />
Reconnaissance Office and are part of the (TS) National<br />
Reconnaissance Program.” Normal military security<br />
would apply to other <strong>MOL</strong> study activities conducted<br />
outside Project DORIAN. The fact that certain actual<br />
reconnaissance studies were under way for application<br />
to <strong>MOL</strong>, and the existence and participation of <strong>NRO</strong>, etc.,<br />
were to be considered extremely sensitive and required<br />
handling under the BYEMAN security system. 27<br />
He recommended use of a telescopic system for<br />
the pointing, image motion compensation, and focus<br />
experiments. Pointing accuracy could be recorded with<br />
a simple collimated camera of resolution easily available<br />
from unclassified equipment. IMC performance could<br />
be recorded by photographing stars or by use of long<br />
exposures. He agreed that photography of the quality<br />
approaching that needed for reconnaissance might be<br />
undertaken on some orbital flights. An experimental<br />
camera held under special security (an F/16 camera<br />
with 240” focal length) might be made available as<br />
government-furnished equipment. 25