26.12.2015 Views

NRO-MOL_2015

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 The Dorian Files Revealed: a Compendium of the <strong>NRO</strong>’s Manned Orbiting Laboratory Documents<br />

be the necessity for a significantly<br />

different design approach which will<br />

be responsive to agency’s needs. 24<br />

In an effort to respond to this criticism of the MORL<br />

contract, the space agency revised its study task to<br />

“lay a broad foundation for a versatile space laboratory<br />

in such a way as to allow for later incorporation of a<br />

wide variety of experimental requirements.” According<br />

to this revision, the MORL study would be carried out<br />

in parallel with DoD’s space station studies and would<br />

make it possible “for a merging of the two with a<br />

minimum of delay.” It would also cost less—$1.2 million<br />

instead of $3.5 million. NASA expressed the belief that<br />

this approach would facilitate the early initiation of a<br />

preliminary design phase that would accommodate the<br />

requirements of both agencies.* 25<br />

Meanwhile, in accordance with the September 1963<br />

NASA-DoD agreement, Dr. McMillan directed AFSC<br />

to continue to provide Air Force documents to NASA.<br />

Later, on 8 November, Headquarters USAF provided<br />

AFSC formal guidance on the procedures to follow in<br />

transferring such information. A newly-established office,<br />

the Deputy Director of Development Planning, Space, †<br />

was designated the Air Staff focal point for conceptual<br />

planning of a possible new manned earth orbital and<br />

research project and for exercising “authoritative review”<br />

over exchange of space station data between the Air<br />

Force and NASA. AFSC was required to submit a monthly<br />

status report on all space station study activities, a list of<br />

new NASA space station reports, and other data. 26<br />

The Air Force OSS Study<br />

For almost half a year—while the above top-level<br />

planning was proceeding—the Air Force’s MOD study<br />

proposals had languished. However, in the spring of 1963,<br />

reacting to NASA’s space station activities, the Air Force<br />

took steps to resurrect the project. On 16 May, Lt General<br />

Howell M. Estes, Jr., AFSC Vice Commander, wrote to<br />

General Ferguson suggesting that they initiate a “pre-<br />

Phase I” or “Zero Phase” MODS study at an estimated<br />

cost of $1 million. He said that since any space station<br />

program would probably be a joint DoD-NASA effort, it<br />

was imperative that DoD be in a position to evaluate the<br />

extent to which objectives of Program 287 (MOD)can be<br />

obtained by whatever program NASA proposes.” 27<br />

* OSD approved the revised study as well as the two other studies planned<br />

by NASA.<br />

† Established 23 September 1953. See also Chapter V, “Evolution of the<br />

<strong>MOL</strong> Management Structure.”<br />

After Dr. McMillan authorized Estes to proceed, on 22<br />

May AFSC submitted a formal proposal to Headquarters<br />

USAF for a three-month pre-program definition MODS<br />

study effort. The study’s basic purpose was “to enable<br />

DoD to evaluate the extent to which the objectives of<br />

MODS can be attained by the space station program<br />

expected to be proposed by NASA this fall. Specific<br />

study objectives were: (1) establish precisely the peculiar<br />

requirements for a military orbital development system,<br />

including the detailed design and schedule or the orbital<br />

tests which would be needed; and (2) to determine<br />

the minimum acceptable performance characteristics<br />

of the station module, shuttle vehicle, and associated<br />

equipment, as well as the criteria required to make the<br />

system militarily useful. 28<br />

While awaiting Headquarters USAF approval of the<br />

MODS study, AFSC on 27 May directed the Space<br />

Systems Division to begin preparation of RFP’s, the<br />

MODS work statement, and other papers. On 12<br />

June AFSC further advised that the Phase Zero study<br />

should consider “total DoD requirements” and that Army<br />

and Navy mission requirements would be sought for<br />

incorporation into an appendix to the work statements.<br />

AFSC said Army and Navy representatives also would be<br />

invited to participate in the review of contractor progress<br />

and final reports. 29<br />

Subsequently, on 24 June, AFSC invited the Army<br />

and Navy to participate in the Phase Zero study<br />

effort. It asked the two services to provide information<br />

on missions “which either potentially may most<br />

advantageously be conducted from space, or advanced<br />

through manned space experimentation and testing.”<br />

To help prepare their submissions, AFSC forwarded<br />

background information on the study and advised that<br />

their designated representatives would be able to attend<br />

contractor progress briefings. If a development program<br />

followed, Army and Navy personnel also would be<br />

included in the AFSC project office. 30<br />

Early in July 1963 AFSC prepared a revised Form<br />

613c for the National Orbital Space Station, the<br />

new designation superseding MODS. However, this<br />

name was short-lived, as the study project was finally<br />

identified as the Orbital Space Station (OSS), adopting<br />

terminology used by the Secretary of Defense. On 17<br />

July Secretary Zuckert forwarded the OSS descriptive<br />

task to the Secretary of Defense and advised he intended<br />

to initiate the study at a cost of $1 million. Its primary<br />

purpose would be to examine “on an overall parametric<br />

basis” the contributions such a vehicle could make to<br />

enhancing military objectives. Zuckert reported the Air<br />

Force intended to exchange data and maintain close<br />

coordination with the Army, Navy, and NASA. 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!