NRO-MOL_2015
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter IV - PLANNING THE MANNED ORBITNG LABORATORY December 1963-June 1964<br />
41<br />
Policy for the Conduct of the <strong>MOL</strong><br />
Program<br />
At the end of March 1964, Dr. McMillan issued a<br />
statement of policy to govern the conduct of the<br />
early phases of the <strong>MOL</strong> program. Once again he<br />
emphasized that the primary objectives of the program<br />
were experimental: “To obtain authoritative data, in an<br />
economical way, on the possible contributions of man<br />
to the performance of military missions in space, and to<br />
obtain data on man’s performance sufficient to form a<br />
basis for design and evaluation of manned systems.” He<br />
further directed that:<br />
No requirement to develop an<br />
operational system will interfere<br />
with the requirements imposed by the<br />
experiments to be performed; cost<br />
and schedules will be defined by the<br />
needs of the experimental program.<br />
Experiments will be performed on<br />
orbit only after prior tests on<br />
the ground and, if necessary, in<br />
aircraft, adequately define and<br />
justify orbital tests.<br />
Granted that an orbital flight is<br />
justified by its primary experimental<br />
purposes, such secondary experiments<br />
as are desirably and conveniently<br />
carried along may also be included. 28<br />
Among experimental areas of military interest, McMillan<br />
listed “observations of the earth and earthbound events,<br />
and detection of an interaction with other space vehicles,<br />
both cooperative and uncooperative.” The basic function<br />
of man was to search for and select targets or subjects<br />
for observation, to navigate precisely, adjust and<br />
maintain equipment, and summarize and report data. It<br />
was expected that man would facilitate various missionrelated<br />
experiments including detection, classification,<br />
identification, and tracking of such targets as fixed<br />
installations at known locations; fixed installations<br />
having varying degrees of ambiguity as to location; and<br />
ground vehicles, ships, space vehicles, missile launches,<br />
explosions including nuclear, etc. 29<br />
Like Dr. McMillan, the Director of Defense Research and<br />
Engineering also emphasized at this time that ground<br />
simulation is and thorough advance study would have to<br />
precede any experimental <strong>MOL</strong> effort in space and that<br />
orbital experiments would be designed to test man and<br />
determine just what he could do. Dr. Brown explained<br />
this approach during an appearance before the Senate<br />
Committee on Aeronautics and Space Sciences:<br />
If you just send a man up there<br />
without knowing what experiments he<br />
is going to do when he gets there,<br />
what you are likely to find is that<br />
everything he can do you have a<br />
machine that can do just as well.<br />
I am gradually becoming convinced<br />
that there are some things he can<br />
do better, but I want the experiment<br />
specified first so when he goes up<br />
there he will actually be able to<br />
show he can do better.<br />
I think I can give you one specific<br />
example: I think a man can probably<br />
point a telescope more accurately<br />
than automatic equipment can.<br />
However, unless you design the<br />
equipment to measure that before you<br />
send a man up, and unless you give<br />
him a piece of equipment that will<br />
answer that question...you are not<br />
going to get the answer. 30<br />
Headquarters AFSC, meanwhile, had reconciled itself<br />
to the fact that the <strong>MOL</strong> development plan would not<br />
be approved until it had presented to the Secretary<br />
of Defense “a convincing account of <strong>MOL</strong> program<br />
experiments which will satisfy the objectives of<br />
demonstrating qualitatively and quantitatively the military<br />
usefulness of man in space.” On 9 March General<br />
Funk was instructed to submit a preliminary technical<br />
development plan (PTDP)—to include descriptions of<br />
proposed experiments—that could serve as the single<br />
authoritative <strong>MOL</strong> reference document. 31 In a separate<br />
letter sent to General Funk under the BYEMAN security<br />
system, the SSD commander was advised that the<br />
reconnaissance mission remained extremely sensitive<br />
and that the PTDP should avoid any reference to it. 32<br />
Several weeks before receiving this guidance, SSD<br />
had set up a working group under General Bleymaier<br />
to identify the proposed <strong>MOL</strong> experiments. Designated<br />
the <strong>MOL</strong> Experiments Working Group and headed by<br />
Col William Brady, the SSD System Program Director for<br />
<strong>MOL</strong>, it had a membership of several dozen military and<br />
industrial representatives. During February and March<br />
1964 the group examined more than 400 proposed<br />
experiments submitted by various defense and industrial