26.12.2015 Views

NRO-MOL_2015

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter IV - PLANNING THE MANNED ORBITNG LABORATORY December 1963-June 1964<br />

41<br />

Policy for the Conduct of the <strong>MOL</strong><br />

Program<br />

At the end of March 1964, Dr. McMillan issued a<br />

statement of policy to govern the conduct of the<br />

early phases of the <strong>MOL</strong> program. Once again he<br />

emphasized that the primary objectives of the program<br />

were experimental: “To obtain authoritative data, in an<br />

economical way, on the possible contributions of man<br />

to the performance of military missions in space, and to<br />

obtain data on man’s performance sufficient to form a<br />

basis for design and evaluation of manned systems.” He<br />

further directed that:<br />

No requirement to develop an<br />

operational system will interfere<br />

with the requirements imposed by the<br />

experiments to be performed; cost<br />

and schedules will be defined by the<br />

needs of the experimental program.<br />

Experiments will be performed on<br />

orbit only after prior tests on<br />

the ground and, if necessary, in<br />

aircraft, adequately define and<br />

justify orbital tests.<br />

Granted that an orbital flight is<br />

justified by its primary experimental<br />

purposes, such secondary experiments<br />

as are desirably and conveniently<br />

carried along may also be included. 28<br />

Among experimental areas of military interest, McMillan<br />

listed “observations of the earth and earthbound events,<br />

and detection of an interaction with other space vehicles,<br />

both cooperative and uncooperative.” The basic function<br />

of man was to search for and select targets or subjects<br />

for observation, to navigate precisely, adjust and<br />

maintain equipment, and summarize and report data. It<br />

was expected that man would facilitate various missionrelated<br />

experiments including detection, classification,<br />

identification, and tracking of such targets as fixed<br />

installations at known locations; fixed installations<br />

having varying degrees of ambiguity as to location; and<br />

ground vehicles, ships, space vehicles, missile launches,<br />

explosions including nuclear, etc. 29<br />

Like Dr. McMillan, the Director of Defense Research and<br />

Engineering also emphasized at this time that ground<br />

simulation is and thorough advance study would have to<br />

precede any experimental <strong>MOL</strong> effort in space and that<br />

orbital experiments would be designed to test man and<br />

determine just what he could do. Dr. Brown explained<br />

this approach during an appearance before the Senate<br />

Committee on Aeronautics and Space Sciences:<br />

If you just send a man up there<br />

without knowing what experiments he<br />

is going to do when he gets there,<br />

what you are likely to find is that<br />

everything he can do you have a<br />

machine that can do just as well.<br />

I am gradually becoming convinced<br />

that there are some things he can<br />

do better, but I want the experiment<br />

specified first so when he goes up<br />

there he will actually be able to<br />

show he can do better.<br />

I think I can give you one specific<br />

example: I think a man can probably<br />

point a telescope more accurately<br />

than automatic equipment can.<br />

However, unless you design the<br />

equipment to measure that before you<br />

send a man up, and unless you give<br />

him a piece of equipment that will<br />

answer that question...you are not<br />

going to get the answer. 30<br />

Headquarters AFSC, meanwhile, had reconciled itself<br />

to the fact that the <strong>MOL</strong> development plan would not<br />

be approved until it had presented to the Secretary<br />

of Defense “a convincing account of <strong>MOL</strong> program<br />

experiments which will satisfy the objectives of<br />

demonstrating qualitatively and quantitatively the military<br />

usefulness of man in space.” On 9 March General<br />

Funk was instructed to submit a preliminary technical<br />

development plan (PTDP)—to include descriptions of<br />

proposed experiments—that could serve as the single<br />

authoritative <strong>MOL</strong> reference document. 31 In a separate<br />

letter sent to General Funk under the BYEMAN security<br />

system, the SSD commander was advised that the<br />

reconnaissance mission remained extremely sensitive<br />

and that the PTDP should avoid any reference to it. 32<br />

Several weeks before receiving this guidance, SSD<br />

had set up a working group under General Bleymaier<br />

to identify the proposed <strong>MOL</strong> experiments. Designated<br />

the <strong>MOL</strong> Experiments Working Group and headed by<br />

Col William Brady, the SSD System Program Director for<br />

<strong>MOL</strong>, it had a membership of several dozen military and<br />

industrial representatives. During February and March<br />

1964 the group examined more than 400 proposed<br />

experiments submitted by various defense and industrial

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!