19.12.2016 Views

Architectural_Design_with_SketchUp

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5 Rendering in <strong>SketchUp</strong><br />

There are a few ways to fix this problem. Depending on the situation you are dealing <strong>with</strong>,<br />

you might need to combine some of these. Figure 5.56 illustrates three common approaches<br />

in <strong>SketchUp</strong>: spotlight, light-emitting face, and IES light.<br />

Figure 5.56: Three methods to create recessed lights (left: spotlight; middle: light-emitting face; right: IES light)<br />

The spotlight approach is similar to the one we used previously, <strong>with</strong> the main difference being<br />

that this time we modeled the recessed light as a true recessed can. This allows us to use the internal<br />

walls of the light fixture to capture light and therefore render the light source as an overexposed<br />

circle. The important property to change when using this approach is the falloff angle value,<br />

which must be large enough to include the side walls of the recessed fixture (e.g., 90 degrees).<br />

The second approach, which uses a light-emitting face (a triangle, in this case), will be<br />

discussed in more detail in the next sections. Basically, it uses a <strong>SketchUp</strong> face and applies a<br />

light-emitting material to it. This approach has the benefit that we can control the size of the<br />

light source simply by modifying the size of the face. If you want to use this approach, make<br />

sure you use the simplest face possible. Remember that a triangle is exported to your rendering<br />

application as one face, while a circle has many more faces (which increases rendering<br />

time). It is also not as easy as <strong>with</strong> the other two approaches to tilt the spotlight (e.g., toward<br />

a picture on the wall).<br />

The third method uses an IES light that contains a certain amount of horizontal light spread<br />

in addition to the downlight behavior (the same IES file used in the right image in Figure 5.57).<br />

The benefit of using this approach is that the IES light very likely reproduces the wall reflections<br />

of a true recessed light much better than either of the other two. Figure 5.57 shows a comparison<br />

of all three approaches—note the double-arc light-beam projection <strong>with</strong> the IES light.<br />

Figure 5.57: Rendered potlights from Figure 5.56<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!