20.11.2018 Views

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

economy and ris<strong>in</strong>g unemployment numbers emphasize a number <strong>of</strong> reasons why<br />

homelessness cont<strong>in</strong>ues to exist and grow <strong>in</strong> exponential numbers <strong>in</strong> the United States.<br />

Wages and Income<br />

While past years have seen growth <strong>in</strong> real wages at all levels, wage growth has<br />

collapsed over the past six months. Nom<strong>in</strong>al hourly wages <strong>of</strong> production workers grew<br />

at only one-sixth the rate from December 2007. Also workers also face a cut <strong>in</strong> hours<br />

and nom<strong>in</strong>al weekly earn<strong>in</strong>gs have decl<strong>in</strong>ed. As the recent growth <strong>in</strong> wages has<br />

decl<strong>in</strong>ed, it illustrates that the recession affects everyone <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those able to keep<br />

their jobs while add<strong>in</strong>g pressure to the consumption growth which experts estimate will<br />

further delay economic recovery (<strong>Economic</strong> Policy Institute, 2009).<br />

Low-wage workers have been particularly hard hit by wage trends. More than four<br />

decades ago <strong>in</strong> 1967, a year-round worker earn<strong>in</strong>g the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage was paid enough<br />

to raise a family <strong>of</strong> three above the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e (Solar, 1995). From 1981-1990,<br />

however, the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage was frozen at $3.35 an hour, while the cost <strong>of</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased 48% over the same period. Congress raised the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage to $5.15 per<br />

hour <strong>in</strong> 1996, and it has not been raised until 2007. In 2007, President Bush signed <strong>in</strong>to<br />

law a plan that would <strong>in</strong>crease the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage to $7.25 an hour, over two years.<br />

This <strong>in</strong>crease has not kept up with the ground lost to <strong>in</strong>flation <strong>in</strong> the last 20 years; thus,<br />

the real value <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage today is 26% less than <strong>in</strong> 1979 (<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong><br />

Policy Institute, 2005), worth only $4.42 <strong>in</strong> real dollars (AFL-CIO, 2005). In today’s<br />

current market, a full-time m<strong>in</strong>imum wage worker work<strong>in</strong>g 40 hours a week and 52<br />

weeks per year would earn $13,624. This puts him nearly 25% below the $18,310 (<strong>US</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services, 2009) poverty level for a family <strong>of</strong> three.<br />

This worker falls below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e even after factor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the earned <strong>in</strong>come tax<br />

credit, which was created to br<strong>in</strong>g low-wage workers up to the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e (<strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Economic</strong> Policy Institute, 2007). <strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Policy Institute estimates that by 2009,<br />

the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage <strong>in</strong>crease will raise full-time m<strong>in</strong>imum wage workers above the<br />

poverty l<strong>in</strong>e for a family <strong>of</strong> two for the first time <strong>in</strong> more than ten years (<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong><br />

Policy Institute, 2007). Even after the next wage <strong>in</strong>crease to $7.25, a family <strong>of</strong> three will<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> about $3,000 below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e, and a family <strong>of</strong> four will be more than<br />

$6,000 below it [U.S. Health and Human Services]. Contrary to popular belief, the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum-wage workers are not teenagers: approximately 79% <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

age workers are 20 or older (<strong>The</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> Policy Institute, 2008).<br />

In addition to the erosion <strong>in</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage, there are other factors that<br />

contribute to the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> wage decl<strong>in</strong>e. As more countries compete aga<strong>in</strong>st each<br />

other, the result may be add<strong>in</strong>g a downward pressure on wages. Also, the weaken<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

union power and labor policies may have some affect on the wage decl<strong>in</strong>e (International<br />

Labor Organization, 2008).<br />

Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g wages, <strong>in</strong> turn, have put hous<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> reach for many workers: a household<br />

would need more than one full time m<strong>in</strong>imum wage worker to afford a two-bedroom<br />

rental apartment at fair market rent (National Low Income Hous<strong>in</strong>g Coalition, 2009). In<br />

Page 30 <strong>of</strong> 289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!