20.11.2018 Views

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

common problem, with 68 percent subject to low earn<strong>in</strong>gs, either as the only problem or<br />

<strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with other labor market problems. About 31 percent experienced<br />

unemployment as the ma<strong>in</strong> labor market problem or <strong>in</strong> conjunction with other problems.<br />

Four percent <strong>of</strong> the work<strong>in</strong>g poor experience all three problems: low earn<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

unemployment, and <strong>in</strong>voluntary part-time employment.<br />

Some 685,000, or 18 percent, <strong>of</strong> the work<strong>in</strong>g poor who usually worked full time did not<br />

experience any <strong>of</strong> the three primary labor market problems <strong>in</strong> 2015. <strong>The</strong>ir classification<br />

as work<strong>in</strong>g poor may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by other factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g short-term employment,<br />

some weeks <strong>of</strong> voluntary part-time work, or a family structure that <strong>in</strong>creases the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

poverty.<br />

********<br />

Concepts and Def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

Poverty classification. Poverty statistics presented <strong>in</strong> this report are based on def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

developed by the Social Security Adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>in</strong> 1964 and revised by federal<br />

<strong>in</strong>teragency committees <strong>in</strong> 1969 and 1981. <strong>The</strong>se def<strong>in</strong>itions orig<strong>in</strong>ally were based on<br />

the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture’s Economy Food Plan and reflected the different<br />

consumption requirements <strong>of</strong> families on the basis <strong>of</strong> factors such as family size and the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> children under 18 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

<strong>The</strong> actual poverty<br />

thresholds vary with the<br />

makeup <strong>of</strong> the family. In<br />

2015, the weighted average<br />

poverty threshold for a family<br />

<strong>of</strong> four was $24,257; for a<br />

family <strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e or more<br />

people, the threshold was<br />

$49,177; and for one person,<br />

it was $12,082. Poverty<br />

thresholds are updated each<br />

year to reflect changes <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Consumer Price Index for All<br />

Urban Consumers (CPI-U).<br />

Thresholds do not vary<br />

geographically.<br />

Low Earn<strong>in</strong>gs. <strong>The</strong> low-earn<strong>in</strong>gs level, as first developed <strong>in</strong> 1987, represented the<br />

average <strong>of</strong> the real value <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>imum wage between 1967 and 1987 for a 40-hour<br />

workweek. <strong>The</strong> year 1967 was chosen as the base year because that was the first year<br />

<strong>in</strong> which m<strong>in</strong>imum-wage legislation covered essentially the same broad group <strong>of</strong><br />

workers that currently is covered. <strong>The</strong> low-earn<strong>in</strong>gs level has been adjusted each year<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce then <strong>in</strong> accordance with the CPI-U, so the measure ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s the same real value<br />

that it held <strong>in</strong> 1987. In 2015, the low-earn<strong>in</strong>gs threshold was $348.85 per week.<br />

Page 75 <strong>of</strong> 289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!