20.11.2018 Views

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6Estimates 1National Estimates by CoC<br />

<strong>Homelessness</strong> Chronically Homeless <strong>in</strong> the United Individuals States<br />

Data source: PIT 2007-2017<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> State and Statewide CoCs<br />

Smaller Cities, Counties, and Regional CoCs<br />

Major Cities<br />

EXHIBIT 6.6: Chronically Homeless<br />

Individuals<br />

0 100<br />

By CoC Category and Sheltered Status, 2017<br />

All Chronically<br />

Homeless<br />

Sheltered<br />

Chronically Homeless<br />

Individuals<br />

Unsheltered<br />

Chronically Homeless<br />

Individuals<br />

0% 100%<br />

Major Cities<br />

51.2<br />

57.3<br />

33.3 9.4<br />

36.3<br />

12.5<br />

60.1 31.9 8.0<br />

Smaller City, County, and Regional CoCs<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> State and Statewide CoCs<br />

On a S<strong>in</strong>gle Night <strong>in</strong> January 2017<br />

• Los Angeles had the largest number<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with chronic patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

homelessness, with 19 percent <strong>of</strong> the nation’s<br />

chronically homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals, 16,016 people.<br />

New York City had the second largest number,<br />

with 4,401 <strong>in</strong>dividuals with chronic patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

homelessness.<br />

• Major city CoCs accounted for 57 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> all <strong>in</strong>dividuals with chronic patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

homelessness, smaller cities, counties and<br />

regional CoCs had 33 percent, and BoS and<br />

statewide CoCs accounted for n<strong>in</strong>e percent <strong>of</strong><br />

chronically homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />

• Major cities accounted for a larger share <strong>of</strong> the<br />

chronically homeless <strong>in</strong>dividual population<br />

found <strong>in</strong> places not suitable for human<br />

habitation, (60%) than <strong>of</strong> the sheltered chronic<br />

population (51%).<br />

• Boston, MA had the lowest percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with chronic patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

homelessness who were unsheltered, at seven<br />

percent. Ma<strong>in</strong>e BoS reported no unsheltered<br />

chronically homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals on the night <strong>of</strong><br />

the count. Among smaller cities, counties, and<br />

regional CoCs, Cambridge, MA reported the<br />

lowest unsheltered rate (14%) followed closely<br />

by Grand Rapids, MI (15%).<br />

• <strong>The</strong> District <strong>of</strong> Columbia and Long Beach,<br />

CA had the highest rates <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />

homelessness among homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> major cities, each with 41 percent. While<br />

Los Angeles and New York had the largest<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with chronic patterns<br />

<strong>of</strong> homelessness, their rates <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />

homelessness were not among the highest<br />

(34% <strong>in</strong> Los Angeles and 14% <strong>in</strong> New York).<br />

• Among smaller cities, counties, and regional<br />

CoCs, Hendry, Hardee, and Highlands<br />

Counties <strong>in</strong> Florida had the highest rate <strong>of</strong><br />

chronic homelessness among <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

(63%) followed by Norman, OK (61%). In New<br />

Mexico BoS, almost half (48%) <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />

experienc<strong>in</strong>g homelessness had chronic<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> homelessness, the highest rate <strong>of</strong> its<br />

CoC category.<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uums <strong>of</strong> Care (CoC) Were<br />

Divided <strong>in</strong>to Three Geographic<br />

Categories<br />

Major city CoCs (n=48) cover the 50 largest<br />

cities <strong>in</strong> the United States. In two cases<br />

(Phoenix and Mesa, AZ, and Arl<strong>in</strong>gton and<br />

Fort Worth, TX), two large cities were located<br />

<strong>in</strong> the same CoC.<br />

Smaller city, county, and regional CoCs<br />

(n=306) are jurisdictions that are neither one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 50 largest cities <strong>in</strong> the United States nor<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> State and Statewide CoCs.<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> State (BoS) and statewide CoCs<br />

(n=40) are typically composed <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

rural counties or represent an entire state.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!