20.11.2018 Views

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6Estimates 1National Estimates by CoC<br />

<strong>Homelessness</strong> Chronically Homeless <strong>in</strong> the United Individuals States<br />

Data source: PIT 2007-2017, Excludes Puerto Rico and U.S. Territories<br />

EXHIBIT 6.8: CoCs with the Highest and Lowest Rates <strong>of</strong> Unsheltered Chronically<br />

Homeless Individuals<br />

By CoC Category, 2017<br />

CoC<br />

Highest Rates<br />

Los Angeles City &<br />

County, CA<br />

Fresno/Madera<br />

County, CA<br />

San Jose/Santa Clara<br />

City & County, CA<br />

Major City CoCs<br />

Total<br />

Chronically<br />

Homeless<br />

Individuals<br />

Smaller City, County,<br />

and Regional CoCs a<br />

Total<br />

%<br />

Unsheltered CoC Chronically<br />

Homeless<br />

Individuals<br />

16,016 95.4% Hendry, Hardee,<br />

Highlands Counties,<br />

FL<br />

688 93.5% Ocala/Marion<br />

County, FL<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> State<br />

and Statewide CoCs<br />

Total<br />

%<br />

Unsheltered CoC Chronically<br />

Homeless<br />

Individuals<br />

236 100.0% Hawaii Balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> State<br />

137 100.0% Arizona Balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> State<br />

2,018 87.1% Amarillo, TX 112 100.0% Georgia Balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> State<br />

%<br />

Unsheltered<br />

551 95.1%<br />

358 83.5%<br />

210 79.0%<br />

Oakland/Alameda<br />

County, CA<br />

1,620 86.8% Merced City &<br />

County, CA<br />

120 99.2% Texas Balance <strong>of</strong><br />

State<br />

764 78.1%<br />

San Antonio/Bexar<br />

County, TX<br />

646 85.3% Lake County, CA 134 98.5% Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> State<br />

834 75.9%<br />

Lowest Rates<br />

Boston, MA 526 7.2% Cambridge, MA 181 14.4% Ma<strong>in</strong>e Balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> State<br />

Omaha/Council<br />

Bluffs, NE<br />

M<strong>in</strong>neapolis/<br />

Hennep<strong>in</strong> County,<br />

MN<br />

Dallas City &<br />

County/Irv<strong>in</strong>g, TX<br />

276 13.8% Grand Rapids/<br />

Wyom<strong>in</strong>g/Kent<br />

County, MI<br />

318 18.6% Pittsburgh/<br />

McKeesport/Penn<br />

Hills/Allegheny<br />

County, PA<br />

511 20.7% Yonkers/<br />

Mount Vernon/<br />

New Rochelle/<br />

Westchester, NY<br />

108 14.8% Indiana Balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> State<br />

117 16.2% Rhode Island<br />

Statewide<br />

109 16.5% Wiscons<strong>in</strong><br />

Balance <strong>of</strong> State<br />

Indianapolis, IN 181 23.2% Boise/Ada County, ID 302 18.9% South Dakota<br />

Statewide<br />

189 0.0%<br />

305 3.9%<br />

240 10.4%<br />

169 16.0%<br />

101 19.8%<br />

a<br />

Excludes CoCs with less than 100 total chronically homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals.<br />

Los Angeles, CA experienced the<br />

largest <strong>in</strong>crease, with 3,046 more<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals with chronic patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

homelessness <strong>in</strong> 2017 than <strong>in</strong> 2016<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!