20.11.2018 Views

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPPAGA Report Report No. 05-01<br />

• requests renewal fund<strong>in</strong>g for projects that<br />

were funded <strong>in</strong> previous years.<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uums <strong>of</strong> care may receive less than their<br />

pro-rata amount if HUD determ<strong>in</strong>es that their<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g applications do not adequately address<br />

grant award criteria or if the cont<strong>in</strong>uum does not<br />

seek renewal fund<strong>in</strong>g for its projects.<br />

Some Florida cont<strong>in</strong>uums have not done well <strong>in</strong><br />

access<strong>in</strong>g HUD fund<strong>in</strong>g. Between 2001 and 2003,<br />

15 cont<strong>in</strong>uums received less than their pro-rata<br />

amount as <strong>in</strong>itially determ<strong>in</strong>ed by HUD. State<br />

Office on <strong>Homelessness</strong> and HUD managers<br />

reported that coalitions received less than their<br />

pro-rata amount because they failed to apply for<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g, submitted applications that conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

errors or <strong>in</strong>cluded activities that were <strong>in</strong>eligible for<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g, or did not have a permanent hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />

project <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> their plans.<br />

Access to ma<strong>in</strong>stream services could be<br />

improved. A major concern <strong>in</strong> serv<strong>in</strong>g homeless<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals is ensur<strong>in</strong>g they have access to federal<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream assistance programs. Ma<strong>in</strong>stream<br />

programs are those that provide various forms <strong>of</strong><br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial, health, and social support designed to<br />

remedy the disabl<strong>in</strong>g conditions and other<br />

problems that prevent homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals from<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g healthy and liv<strong>in</strong>g as self-sufficiently as<br />

possible <strong>in</strong> permanent, stable hous<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

programs, such as Temporary Assistance to Needy<br />

Families (TANF), Medicaid, and Social Security<br />

Income (SSI) are <strong>in</strong>tended to help lower <strong>in</strong>come<br />

people and not dedicated to serv<strong>in</strong>g the homeless.<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g and Urban<br />

Development requires local cont<strong>in</strong>uums <strong>of</strong> care to<br />

report on the extent to which they are<br />

systematically assist<strong>in</strong>g homeless persons to access<br />

federal ma<strong>in</strong>stream program services as part <strong>of</strong><br />

their grant applications. As shown <strong>in</strong> Exhibit 3,<br />

most <strong>of</strong> Florida’s homeless cont<strong>in</strong>uums <strong>of</strong> care<br />

reported they were assist<strong>in</strong>g homeless people<br />

access several ma<strong>in</strong>stream programs.<br />

However, some cont<strong>in</strong>uums could improve their<br />

efforts to help homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals access federal<br />

programs. For example, 11 <strong>of</strong> 26 cont<strong>in</strong>uums did<br />

not report help<strong>in</strong>g homeless persons access<br />

services provided through the State Children’s<br />

Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), and eight did<br />

not report help<strong>in</strong>g them access Workforce<br />

Investment Act services.<br />

Exhibit 3<br />

Most Cont<strong>in</strong>uums <strong>of</strong> Care Assist Homeless Persons<br />

Access Ma<strong>in</strong>stream Program Services<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Cont<strong>in</strong>uums<br />

Assist<strong>in</strong>g Homeless<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong>stream Program<br />

(N=26)<br />

State Children’s Health Insurance<br />

Program (SCHIP) 15<br />

Workforce Incentive Act (WIA) 18<br />

Supplemental Security Disability<br />

Income (SSDI) 22<br />

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 23<br />

Veterans Health Care 23<br />

Medicaid 24<br />

Food Stamps 24<br />

Temporary Assistance for Needy<br />

Families (TANF) 25<br />

Source: OPPAGA analysis <strong>of</strong> 26 Cont<strong>in</strong>uum <strong>of</strong> Care applications.<br />

We contacted representatives <strong>of</strong> six cont<strong>in</strong>uums <strong>of</strong><br />

care that reported that their member agencies did<br />

not rout<strong>in</strong>ely help homeless persons identify,<br />

apply for, and follow up to receive benefits for<br />

two or more ma<strong>in</strong>stream programs. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

representatives gave several reasons for not<br />

assist<strong>in</strong>g homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals to access<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream programs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g not be<strong>in</strong>g aware<br />

<strong>of</strong> programs such as SCHIP and the Workforce<br />

Investment Act and difficulty <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

their regional workforce agency that adm<strong>in</strong>isters<br />

the Workforce Investment Act. However, two<br />

representatives <strong>in</strong>dicated that their cont<strong>in</strong>uums<br />

had <strong>in</strong>correctly completed their HUD grant<br />

applications and were <strong>in</strong> fact help<strong>in</strong>g homeless<br />

persons access ma<strong>in</strong>stream programs.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>in</strong> the Council on<br />

<strong>Homelessness</strong> strategic plan is to <strong>in</strong>crease the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> homeless <strong>in</strong>dividuals assisted by<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream programs. In September 2004, the<br />

Office on <strong>Homelessness</strong> proposed that<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> local cont<strong>in</strong>uums <strong>of</strong> care meet<br />

with state agency <strong>of</strong>ficials who adm<strong>in</strong>ister<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>stream programs to (1) identify barriers that<br />

limit the ability <strong>of</strong> the homeless to access program<br />

benefits, and (2) work cooperatively to develop<br />

solutions that can elim<strong>in</strong>ate those barriers. As <strong>of</strong><br />

November 2004, the Office on <strong>Homelessness</strong> had<br />

developed a list <strong>of</strong> programs that local homeless<br />

coalitions need help access<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong>se programs<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude the Department <strong>of</strong> Children and Families’<br />

Emergency F<strong>in</strong>ancial Assistance for Hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!