20.11.2018 Views

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Although the service sector has the highest rate <strong>of</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g poverty, a significant portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the work<strong>in</strong>g poor are blue-collar workers <strong>in</strong> the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, agriculture, and<br />

construction <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

Most manufactur<strong>in</strong>g jobs used to <strong>of</strong>fer generous wages and benefits, but manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

job quality has decl<strong>in</strong>ed over the years. Nowadays, many <strong>US</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g jobs are<br />

located <strong>in</strong> right-to-work states, where it is nearly impossible for workers to form a union.<br />

This means that<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g employers are<br />

able to pay lower wages and<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer fewer benefits than they<br />

used to.<br />

Demographic Factors<br />

In her book, No Shame <strong>in</strong> My<br />

Game, Kather<strong>in</strong>e Newman<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ds that "[t]he nation's<br />

young, its s<strong>in</strong>gle parents, the<br />

poorly educated, and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>orities are more likely than<br />

other workers to be poor"<br />

(p. 42). <strong>The</strong>se factors, <strong>in</strong><br />

addition to be<strong>in</strong>g part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

large household, be<strong>in</strong>g part <strong>of</strong><br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle-earner household,<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g female, and hav<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

part-time (<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> a fulltime)<br />

job have been found to be important work<strong>in</strong>g poverty "risk factors." Immigrant<br />

workers and self-employed workers are also more likely to be work<strong>in</strong>g poor than other<br />

k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> workers.<br />

<strong>Economic</strong> Factors<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a widespread assumption that economic growth leads to tighter labor markets<br />

and higher wages. However, the evidence suggests that economic growth does not<br />

always benefit each part <strong>of</strong> the population equally. For example, the 1980s was a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic growth and prosperity <strong>in</strong> the United States, but most <strong>of</strong> the economic ga<strong>in</strong>s<br />

were concentrated at the top <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>come spectrum. This means that people near the<br />

bottom <strong>of</strong> the labor market did not benefit from the economic ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the 1980s. In fact,<br />

many have argued that low-skilled workers experienced decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g prosperity <strong>in</strong> the<br />

1980s. <strong>The</strong>refore, chang<strong>in</strong>g economic conditions do not have as large <strong>of</strong> an impact on<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g poverty rates as one might expect.<br />

Page 55 <strong>of</strong> 289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!