20.11.2018 Views

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Us<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>US</strong> Census Bureau's def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> poverty, the work<strong>in</strong>g poverty rate seems to<br />

have rema<strong>in</strong>ed relatively stable s<strong>in</strong>ce 1978. However, many scholars have argued that<br />

the <strong>of</strong>ficial poverty threshold is too low, and that real wages and work<strong>in</strong>g conditions<br />

have actually decl<strong>in</strong>ed for many workers over the past three or four decades. Social<br />

scientists like Arne Kalleberg have found that the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>US</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and the<br />

subsequent polarization <strong>of</strong> the labor market has led to an overall worsen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> wages,<br />

job stability, and work<strong>in</strong>g conditions for people with lower skill levels and less formal<br />

education. From the mid-1940s to the mid-1970s, manufactur<strong>in</strong>g jobs <strong>of</strong>fered many lowskilled<br />

and medium-skilled workers stable, well-pay<strong>in</strong>g jobs. Due to global competition,<br />

technological advances, and other factors, <strong>US</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g jobs have been<br />

disappear<strong>in</strong>g for decades. (From 1970 to 2008, the percentage <strong>of</strong> the labor force<br />

employed <strong>in</strong> the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector shrank from 23.4% to 9.1%.) Dur<strong>in</strong>g this period <strong>of</strong><br />

decl<strong>in</strong>e, job growth became polarized on either end <strong>of</strong> the labor market. That is, the jobs<br />

that replaced medium-pay, low- to medium-skill manufactur<strong>in</strong>g jobs were high-pay<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

high-skill jobs and low-pay<strong>in</strong>g, low-skill jobs. <strong>The</strong>refore, many low- to medium-skilled<br />

workers who would have been able to work <strong>in</strong> the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector <strong>in</strong> 1970 must<br />

now take low-pay<strong>in</strong>g, precarious jobs <strong>in</strong> the service sector.<br />

<strong>US</strong> Compared To<br />

Europe<br />

Other high-<strong>in</strong>come<br />

countries have also<br />

experienced<br />

decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sectors over the past<br />

four decades, but<br />

most <strong>of</strong> them have<br />

not experienced as<br />

much labor market<br />

polarization as the United States. Labor market polarization has been the most severe<br />

<strong>in</strong> liberal market economies like the <strong>US</strong>, Brita<strong>in</strong>, and Australia. Countries like Denmark<br />

and France have been subject to the same economic pressures, but due to their more<br />

"<strong>in</strong>clusive" (or "egalitarian") labor market <strong>in</strong>stitutions, such as centralized and solidaristic<br />

collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and strong m<strong>in</strong>imum wage laws, they have experienced less<br />

polarization.<br />

Cross-national studies have found that European countries' work<strong>in</strong>g poverty rates are<br />

much lower than the <strong>US</strong>'s. Most <strong>of</strong> this difference can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that<br />

European countries' welfare states are more generous than the <strong>US</strong>'s. <strong>The</strong> relationship<br />

between generous welfare states and low rates <strong>of</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g poverty is elaborated upon <strong>in</strong><br />

the "Risk Factors" and "Anti-Poverty Policies" sections.<br />

<strong>The</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g graph uses data from Brady, Fullerton, and Cross (2010) to show the<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g poverty rates for a small sample <strong>of</strong> countries. Brady, Fullerton, and Cross<br />

Page 53 <strong>of</strong> 289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!