The Economic Consequences of Homelessness in The US

spouse have an FSA, the family limit is $5,000—but you could get as much as $2,000 in
tax savings if your combined contributions reach the maximum.
Education and Training
Some argue that more vocational training and active labour market policies, especially
in growth industries like healthcare and renewable energy, is the solution to working
poverty. To be sure, wider availability of vocational training could pull some people out
of working poverty, but the fact remains that the low-wage service sector is a rapidly
growing part of the US economy. Even if more nursing and clean energy jobs were
added to the economy, there would still be a huge portion of the workforce in low-wage
service sector jobs like retail, food service, and cleaning. Therefore, it seems clear that
any significant reduction in the working poverty rate will have to come from offering
higher wages and more benefits to the current, and future, population of service sector
workers.
Child Support Assurance
Given the fact that such a large proportion of working poor households are headed by a
single mother, one clear way to reduce working poverty would be to make sure that
children's fathers share the cost of child rearing. In cases where the father cannot
provide child support, scholars like Irwin Garfinkel advocate for the implementation of a
child support guarantee, whereby the government pays childcare costs if the father
cannot. Child support is not always a guarantee if the father or mother does not work.
For example, if the parent without custody is not working then the parent with custody
does not receive any child support unless the non working parent is employed at their
job longer than 90 days, excluding if the non begins to work for its a city or government.
Also, the government does not pay for childcare cost if you make more than the cut off
range (your gross, per county or state.)
Marriage
Households with two wage-earners have a significantly lower rate of working poverty
than households with only one wage-earner. Also, households with two adults, but only
one wage-earner, have lower working poverty rates than households with only one
adult. Therefore, it seems clear that having two adults in a household, especially if there
are children present, is more likely to keep a household out of poverty than having just
one adult in a household. Many scholars and policymakers have used this fact to argue
that encouraging people to get married and stay married is an effective way to reduce
working poverty (and poverty in general). However, this is easier said than done.
Research has shown that low-income people marry less often than higher-income
people because they have a more difficult time finding a partner who is employed, which
is often seen as a prerequisite for marriage. Therefore, unless the employment
Page 62 of 289