25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 Resistance of piles to compressive loads<br />

is calculated from the peak value of c u. To allow for the flexibility <strong>and</strong> slenderness ratio of<br />

the pile it is necessary to reduce the values of � p by a length factor, F, as shown in<br />

Figure 4.6b. Thus total shaft friction:<br />

Q s � F� pc uA s<br />

(4.8)<br />

The slenderness ratio, L/B, influences the mobilization of shaft friction in two ways. First,<br />

a slender pile can ‘whip’ or flutter during driving causing a gap around the pile at a shallow<br />

depth. The second influence is the slip at the interface when the shear stress at transfer from<br />

the pile to the soil exceeds the peak value of shear strength <strong>and</strong> passes into the lower residual<br />

strength. This is illustrated by the shear/strain curve of the simple shear box test on a<br />

clay. The peak shear strength is reached at a relatively small strain followed by the much<br />

lower residual strength at long strain. It follows that when an axial load is applied to the head<br />

of a long flexible pile the relative movement between the pile <strong>and</strong> the clay at a shallow depth<br />

can be large enough to reach the stage of low post-peak strength at the interface. Near the<br />

pile toe the relative movement between the compressible pile <strong>and</strong> the compressible clay may<br />

not have reached the stage of mobilizing the peak shear strength. At some intermediate level<br />

the post-peak condition may have been reached but not the lowest residual condition. It is<br />

therefore evident that calculation of the skin friction resistance from the results of the peak<br />

undrained shear strength, as obtained from unconfined or triaxial compression tests in the<br />

laboratory, may overestimate the available friction resistance of long piles. The length<br />

factors shown in Figure 4.6b are stated by Semple <strong>and</strong> Rigden to allow both for the flutter<br />

effects <strong>and</strong> the residual or part-residual shear strength conditions at the interface. The effect<br />

of these conditions on the settlement of single piles is discussed in Section 4.6.<br />

Where an overburden of soft clay is overlying a stiff clay adhesion, factors appropriate to<br />

each type should be selected <strong>and</strong> the shaft resistance calculated for the portion of the shaft<br />

embedded in each stratum. The length factor in Figure 4.6b is taken on the overall embedded<br />

length.<br />

In marine structures where piles may be subjected to uplift <strong>and</strong> lateral forces caused by<br />

wave action or the impact of berthing ships, it is frequently necessary to drive the piles to<br />

much greater depths than those necessary to obtain the required resistance to axial<br />

compression loading only. To avoid premature refusal at depths which are insufficient to<br />

obtain the required uplift or lateral resistance, tubular piles are frequently driven with open<br />

ends. At the early stages of driving soil enters the pile when the pile is said to be ‘coring’.<br />

As driving continues shaft friction will build up between the interior soil <strong>and</strong> the pile wall.<br />

This soil is acted on by inertial forces resulting from the blows of the hammer. At some stage<br />

the inertial forces on the core plus the internal shaft friction will exceed the bearing capacity<br />

of the soil at the pile toe calculated on the cross-sectional area of the open end. The plug is<br />

then carried down by the pile as shown in Figure 4.7a. However, on further driving <strong>and</strong> when<br />

subjected to the working load, the pile with its soil plug does not behave in the same way as<br />

one driven to its full penetration with the tip closed by a steel plate or concrete plug. This is<br />

because the soil around <strong>and</strong> beneath the open end is not displaced <strong>and</strong> consolidated to the<br />

same extent as that beneath a solid-end pile.<br />

Comparative tests on open-end <strong>and</strong> closed-end piles were made by Rigden et al. (4.6) The<br />

two piles were 457 mm steel tubes driven to a penetration of 9 m into stiff glacial till in<br />

Yorkshire. A clay plug was formed in the open-end pile <strong>and</strong> carried down to occupy 40% of<br />

the final penetration depth. However, the failure loads of the clay-plugged <strong>and</strong> steel plate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!