25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Depth of borehole<br />

1.5 B<br />

1 in 4<br />

B<br />

Ground investigations, contracts <strong>and</strong> testing 499<br />

2/3D<br />

<strong>Pile</strong> depth assumed from<br />

preliminary investigation<br />

Figure 11.1 Required depth of boreholes for pile groups in compressible soils.<br />

information on the compressibility of the soil or rock strata with depth, thus enabling<br />

calculations to be made of the settlement of the pile groups in the manner described in<br />

Sections 5.2 <strong>and</strong> 5.3. If the piles can be founded on a strong <strong>and</strong> relatively incompressible<br />

rock formation the drilling need not be taken deeper than a few metres below ‘rockhead’ (the<br />

buried interface between overburden or superficial sediments <strong>and</strong> rock), to check that there<br />

are no layers or lenses of weak weathered rock which might impair the base resistance of<br />

individual piles. However, before permission is given for the drilling depth to be curtailed<br />

in this manner there must be reliable geological evidence that the bearing stratum is not<br />

underlain by weak compressible rocks which might deform under pressures transmitted<br />

from heavily loaded pile groups, <strong>and</strong> that large boulders have not been mistaken for bedrock.<br />

Rockhead contours formed due to erosion prior to the deposition of the overburden may be<br />

unrelated to current topographical surface. It is sometimes the practice, when preparing<br />

borehole records, to define rockhead or bedrock as the level at which auger or cable percussion<br />

boring in weak rock is terminated <strong>and</strong> core drilling in the stronger rock commences.<br />

This practice is quite wrong. The decision to change to core drilling may have nothing to do<br />

with the perceived strength of the rock. It may be no more than a routine changeover of<br />

equipment at the end of a working shift.<br />

Particular care is necessary in interpreting borehole information where the site is underlain<br />

by weathered rocks or by alternating strong <strong>and</strong> weak rock formations dipping across the site.<br />

Without an adequate number of cored boreholes <strong>and</strong> their interpretation by a geologist,<br />

wrong assumptions may be made concerning the required penetration depth of end-bearing<br />

piles. Two typical cases of misinterpretation are shown in Figure 11.2.<br />

Where piles are end bearing on a rock formation it may be desirable, for economic<br />

reasons, to obtain a detailed profile of the interface between the bearing stratum <strong>and</strong> the<br />

overburden, so enabling reliable predictions to be made of the required pile lengths over<br />

the site. Cased light cable percussive rig (‘shell <strong>and</strong> auger’) borings followed by rotary core<br />

drilling to prove the rock conditions can be costly when drilled in large numbers at the close<br />

spacing required to establish a detailed profile. Geophysical exploration by seismic refraction<br />

on l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> by continuous seismic profiling at sea are economical methods of establishing<br />

bedrock profiles over large site areas. However, the success of these indirect methods<br />

depends on there being a sufficient contrast in seismic velocity between the rock stratum<br />

D

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!