25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Safety factors generally used in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s in conjunction with the ‘4D – 8D’<br />

method to obtain the allowable pile load are given by te Kamp (4.26) as:<br />

Timber 1.7<br />

Precast concrete, straight shaft 2.0<br />

Precast concrete, enlarged shaft 2.5<br />

Resistance of piles to compressive loads 179<br />

An upper limit is placed on the value of the ultimate base resistance obtained by either of<br />

the methods shown in Figure 4.18. Upper limiting values depend on the particle-size<br />

distribution <strong>and</strong> over-consolidation ratio <strong>and</strong> are shown in Figure 4.19.<br />

The relationship q b = q c in equation 4.18 is valid for piles up to about 500 mm in diameter<br />

or breadth provided, when designing by permissible stress methods, that a pile head<br />

displacement of one-tenth of the diameter is taken as the criterion of failure <strong>and</strong> that a safety<br />

factor of 2.5 is adopted on the calculated total resistance. The reduction of the q b/q c ratio<br />

with increase in diameter is discussed in Section 4.3.7.<br />

Cone-resistance values cannot be used to obtain the end-bearing resistance of bored <strong>and</strong><br />

cast-in-place piles because of the loosening of the soil caused by drilling as described in the<br />

preceding chapter.<br />

A further factor must be considered when calculating pile shaft friction <strong>and</strong> end-bearing<br />

resistance from CPT data. This is the effect of changes in overburden pressure on the q c (<strong>and</strong><br />

also local friction) values at any given level. Changes in overburden pressure can result from<br />

excavation, scour of a river or sea bed, or the loading of the ground surface by placing fill.<br />

The direct relationship between q c <strong>and</strong> overburden pressure is evident from Figure 4.11.<br />

Taking the case of a normally consolidated s<strong>and</strong> when the vertical effective stress is reduced<br />

by excavation, the ratio of the horizontal to the vertical stress is also reduced, but not in the<br />

same proportion depending on the degree of unloading. The effects are most marked at shallow<br />

depths.<br />

Limiting value of ultimate<br />

end-bearing resistance (MN/m2 )<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Fine-coarse s<strong>and</strong>s<br />

OCR=1<br />

Limit 15MN/m 2 for all coarse-grained soils<br />

Very gravelly coarse s<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> with OCR in<br />

range of 2 to 4<br />

Fine gravel <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong> with OCR<br />

in range of 6 to 10<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40<br />

Calculated value of ultimate<br />

end-bearing resistance<br />

(qub ) (MN/m2 )<br />

Figure 4.19 Limiting values of pile end-bearing resistance for solid end piles (after te Kamp (4.26) ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!