25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Top of rock<br />

30˚ 30˚<br />

Figure 6.15 Failure condition at group of anchors in rock.<br />

<strong>Pile</strong>s to resist uplift <strong>and</strong> lateral loading 323<br />

Anchors<br />

Rockhead <strong>Pile</strong><br />

Figure 6.16 Splaying anchors in group to increase uplift resistance.<br />

Shaded area<br />

shows block of<br />

rock resisting<br />

uplift<br />

Drilled<br />

anchor<br />

The calculation of the volume of rock V c in a single cone with a half-angle of 30� at various<br />

angles of inclination � to a horizontal rock surface can be performed with the aid of the curve<br />

for V c/L 3 in Figure 6.17a. The effect of overlapping cones of rock in groups of vertical or<br />

raking anchors can be calculated by reference to Figures 6.17a <strong>and</strong> b. These charts enable the<br />

overlapping volumes �V m <strong>and</strong> �V n to be calculated for a group of anchors arranged on a<br />

rectangular grid. They are not applicable to a diagonal (i.e. ‘staggered’) pattern. All the<br />

anchors in the group are assumed to be arranged at the same angle of inclination to the horizontal<br />

<strong>and</strong> the charts are based on a cone with a 30� half-angle. The charts are not valid if<br />

the sum of (P/n) 2 <strong>and</strong> (S/m) 2 is less than 4 when composite overlapping occurs. In such a case<br />

the total volume acting against uplift should be estimated from the geometry of the system.<br />

Because of the various uncertainties in the design of rock anchors as described above, it<br />

is evident that it is desirable to adopt stressed anchors with every anchor individually<br />

stressed <strong>and</strong> hence checked for pull-out resistance at a proof load of 1.5 times the working<br />

load. However, it should be noted that the technique of stressing anchors by jacking against<br />

the reaction provided by the pile does not check the pull-out resistance of the cone of rock:<br />

this is clear from Figure 6.10. The resistance offered by the mass of rock can be tested only<br />

by providing a reaction beam with bearers sited beyond the influence of the conjectural rock<br />

cone. Tests of this description are very expensive to perform <strong>and</strong> it is usual to avoid them by<br />

adopting conservative assumptions for the dimensions of the cone, <strong>and</strong> applying a safety<br />

factor to the calculated weight if required.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!