25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Miscellaneous piling problems 455<br />

bridge designers. Hambly (9.22) states that foundations for simply supported deck bridges are<br />

frequently designed for differential settlements of up to 1 in 800 relative rotation (25 mm in<br />

a 20 m span). In reasonably homogeneous soils, differential settlements between adjacent<br />

foundations are often assumed to be half of the total settlement, thus a total settlement of<br />

50 mm would be permissible under this criterion. Differential settlements of the order of 1 in<br />

800 in a continuous deck bridge are required to be treated as a load producing bending<br />

moments in the superstructure. This can add to the cost of the bridge, but it should also be<br />

noted that limitation of total settlement to 5 to 10 mm is difficult to achieve with spread<br />

foundations on soils of moderate to low compressibility. Some designers expect the rotation<br />

to be limited to 1 in 4000, which is equivalent to a differential settlement of only 5 mm in<br />

a 20 m span bridge. This would be difficult to ensure for bridges with longer spans even<br />

when supported by piles taken down to a competent bearing stratum. Larger rotations have<br />

to be anticipated in special conditions such as bridges in mining subsidence areas.<br />

The distribution of live load when assessing total <strong>and</strong> differential settlement is usually a<br />

matter of judgement. Full live load on the whole or part of the spans should be allowed for<br />

calculating immediate settlements but the contribution of live load to consolidation settlement<br />

may be small in relation to that from the dead loading. Figure 9.14 shows the loading<br />

on a typical pier foundation for the 4 km-long elevated section of the Jeddah–Mecca<br />

Expressway designed by Dar al-H<strong>and</strong>asah, consulting engineers. The piers support the 36 m<br />

continuous spans of the three-lane carriageway. It will be noted that the predominant horizontal<br />

force on the piers was in a longitudinal direction, the resulting bending moments<br />

increasing the loads on the outer piles of the eight-pile group by about 25% above the<br />

combined vertical dead <strong>and</strong> live loads. It was possible to carry the horizontal forces <strong>and</strong><br />

bending moments by 770 mm diameter bored <strong>and</strong> cast-in-place base-grouted piles of the<br />

type described in 3.3.9 using the ‘flat-jack’ process.<br />

6.50 m<br />

Moment in direction of span � 6750 kN-m<br />

" transverse to " � 4500<br />

Dead load � 14 500 kN<br />

Live � 2200 kN<br />

Total�<br />

16 700 kN<br />

7.50 m<br />

H transverse to span � 100 kN<br />

H in direction of span � 450 kN<br />

770 mm bored <strong>and</strong> cast-in-place piles<br />

with grouted base<br />

Bending moment in pile (max)<br />

� 220 kN-m<br />

P v max 2510 kN<br />

Figure 9.14 Vertical <strong>and</strong> horizontal loads on viaduct piers of Jeddah–Mecca Expressway.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!