25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

356 <strong>Pile</strong>s to resist uplift <strong>and</strong> lateral loading<br />

Width of B9<br />

equivalent<br />

single pile<br />

loading <strong>and</strong> at more than 6 to 8 diameters parallel to this direction. <strong>Pile</strong>s at a closer spacing<br />

can be considered to act as a single unit in order to calculate the ultimate resistance <strong>and</strong><br />

deflections under lateral loads (Figure 6.42). In soft clays <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong>s the effect of driving<br />

piles in groups at close spacing is to stiffen the soil enclosed by the group thus increasing<br />

its capability as a single unit to resist movement when carrying horizontal loading.<br />

Calculations to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of pile groups carrying vertical<br />

<strong>and</strong> horizontal or inclined loading can be performed using the Brinch Hansen general<br />

equation (Section 5.2). The calculations assume that the pile group takes the form of an<br />

equivalent block foundation. EC7 in Clause 7.6.2.1(4) states that the resistance of the group<br />

to compression loading can be calculated by assuming that the group acts as a single largediameter<br />

pile. However, Clause 7.6.3.1 requires the resistance of a group subjected to tension<br />

loading to be provided by the frictional resistance of the soil enclosing a block<br />

foundation. No guidance is given in respect of pile groups carrying transverse loading.<br />

Clause 7.7.1(4)P merely requires group action ‘to be considered’.<br />

6.6 References<br />

Spacing less than 3B<br />

Direction of<br />

loading<br />

Figure 6.42 <strong>Pile</strong>s at close spacing considered as single unit (after Prakash (6.27) ).<br />

6.1 RADHARKRISHNA, H. S. <strong>and</strong> ADAMS, J. I. Long-term uplift capacity of augered footings in fissured<br />

clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 10, No. 4, November 1973, pp. 647–52.<br />

6.2 MEYERHOF, G. G. <strong>and</strong> ADAMS, J. I. The ultimate uplift capacity of foundations, Canadian<br />

Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, November 1968, pp. 225–44.<br />

6.3 UK DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. Offshore installations: Guidance on design <strong>and</strong> construction,<br />

HMSO, London, 1984.<br />

6.4 (a) The strength of grouted pile-sleeve connections for offshore structures: Static tests relating to<br />

sleeve buckling. Wimpey Offshore Engineers <strong>and</strong> Constructors Ltd. HMSO Offshore Technology<br />

Series, OTH.85.223, 1986.<br />

(b) The strength of grouted pile-sleeve connections. A composite report for DoE. HMSO<br />

Offshore Technology Services, OTH.86.210, 1986.<br />

(c) A study of length, longitudinal stiffening <strong>and</strong> size effects on grouted pile-sleeve connections.<br />

Wimpey Offshore Engineers <strong>and</strong> Constructors Ltd. HMSO Offshore Technology Series,<br />

OTH.86.230, 1987.<br />

6.5 LITTLEJOHN, G. S. Soil Anchors, Proceedings of the Conference on Ground Engineering,<br />

Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 1970, pp. 41–4.<br />

6.6 HUTCHINSON, J. N. Discussion on ref. 6.5, Conference proceedings, p. 85.<br />

6.7 WIMPEY LABORATORIES LTD. unpublished report.<br />

B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!