25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

236 Resistance of piles to compressive loads<br />

Total base resistance =<br />

Total pile resistance � 19297 � 7952 � 27249 kN<br />

Factor of safety = which is satisfactory<br />

If the rock socket skin friction were to be only half the calculated value, no load would be<br />

transferred to the pile base. Therefore, the pile head settlement will be caused by compression<br />

in the rock socket only.<br />

From Section 5.5 the modulus ratio of a cemented mudstone is 150, <strong>and</strong> for a mass factor<br />

of 0.2 the deformation modulus of the rock mass is 0.2 � 150 � 4.5 � 135 MN/m2 . In<br />

Figure 4.36 the modulus ratio Ec/Ed is 20 � 103 �<br />

4<br />

27 249<br />

� 3.0<br />

9000<br />

/135 � 148 <strong>and</strong> for L/B � 7/1.5 � 4.7 the<br />

influence factor I is 0.25. The ratio D/B for a recessed socket is 4/1.5 � 2.7. There the reduction<br />

factor from Figure 4.37 is about 0.8. Hence from equation 4.49:<br />

� 1.52 � 4500 � 7952 kN<br />

<strong>Pile</strong> head settlement =<br />

Checking the calculated shaft friction from equation 4.45 <strong>and</strong> take b as 0.25,<br />

fs � 0.25 � 0.53 MN/m2 �4.5<br />

which agrees closely with the value from equation 4.44.<br />

If the socket is grooved to an average depth of 25 mm over shortened socket length of<br />

5.0 m with the grooves at vertical intervals of 0.75 m then:<br />

In equation 4.47, <strong>and</strong> total length of travel � 4.7 � 6.67 �<br />

31.35 m<br />

From equation 4.47, RF � 0.025 � 31.33/0.75 � 5.0 � 0.21<br />

From equation 4.46, fs � 0.8(0.21) 0.45 � 4.5 � 1.78 MN/m2 �r � 0.775 – 0.75 � 0.025 m<br />

Total shaft friction on 5 m socket length � 1.78 � � � 1.5 � 5 � 42 MN<br />

Factor of safety in shaft friction � 42/9 � 4.7, therefore grooving the socket would<br />

theoretically provide a much shorter socket length than the 7 m required for an ungrooved shaft.<br />

Example 4.8<br />

0.8 � 9 � 10 3 � 0.25<br />

1.5 � 135<br />

� 9 mm<br />

A tubular steel pile with an outside diameter of 1067 mm is driven with a closed end to near<br />

refusal in a moderately strong s<strong>and</strong>stone (average q uc = 20 MN/m 2 ) overlain by 15 m of soft<br />

clay. Core drilling in the rock showed a fracture frequency of 5 joints per metre. Calculate<br />

the maximum working load which can be applied to the pile <strong>and</strong> the settlement at this load.<br />

Only a small penetration below rockhead will be possible with s<strong>and</strong>stone of this quality,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the rock will be shattered by the impact. Hence, frictional support both in the soft clay <strong>and</strong><br />

the rock will be negligible compared with the base resistance.<br />

<strong>Pile</strong> driving impact is likely to open joints in the rock hence the base resistance should not<br />

exceed the unconfined compression strength of the intact rock.<br />

Total ultimate pile resistance = base resistance=<br />

For a safety factor of 2.5 allowed load = 17.9<br />

2.5 � 7.2 �<br />

4<br />

MN<br />

� 1.0672 � 20 � 17.9 MN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!