25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

406 Piling for marine structures<br />

permitting vessels to berth in any position along the face. Pairs of rakers resisting the ship<br />

impact are spaced at intervals along the deck or are grouped to form ‘strong points’ with the<br />

deck slab acting as a horizontal beam.<br />

Breasting dolphins for the oil loading terminal of Abu Dhabi Marine Areas Ltd., at Das<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong>, were designed by the British Petroleum Company to consist of groups of vertical steel<br />

tubular piles. The main outer dolphins were formed from a group of seven piles, <strong>and</strong> the inner<br />

secondary dolphins were in three-pile groups. The conditions at sea-bed level, which consisted<br />

of a layer of shelly limestone cap-rock underlain by a stiff calcareous marl <strong>and</strong> then a dense<br />

detrital limestone, favoured the adoption of vertical piles to absorb the berthing forces. The<br />

36.6 m piles varied in outside diameter from 800 mm at the top to 1300 mm at the bottom,<br />

the latter being closed by a full plate on which 15 roller cutters were mounted. The piles were<br />

pitched through a reinforced concrete template placed on the sea bed <strong>and</strong> then drilled down<br />

by rotating them by means of a hydraulically powered rotary table operated from a jack-up<br />

platform. The cuttings were washed up the annular space between the outside of the pile <strong>and</strong><br />

the rock <strong>and</strong> this space was afterwards grouted with a s<strong>and</strong>–cement mix.<br />

Broadhead (8.2) described a pulling test made on a mooring dolphin pile to confirm that the<br />

lateral resistance of the weak rocks below the sea bed would not be exceeded at the working<br />

load. The test pile had a bottom diameter of 1300 mm <strong>and</strong> the pull was applied at a point<br />

24 m above the sea bed. The load/deflection curve obtained at a measuring point 22.86 m<br />

above the sea bed is shown in Figure 8.9 <strong>and</strong> is compared with the theoretical deflection<br />

curve assuming fixity at sea-bed level or support from an uncemented shell s<strong>and</strong> below sea<br />

bed, using the elastic analysis of Reese <strong>and</strong> Matlock (see Section 6.3.4).<br />

Horizontal movement at top of pile (mm)<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

10.4 m 24 m<br />

ARRANGEMENT OF TEST PILE<br />

Pull<br />

Sea level<br />

Theoretical curve for support<br />

by uncemented shell s<strong>and</strong><br />

(Reese <strong>and</strong> Matlock)<br />

100<br />

1300 mm O.D.<br />

steel tubular pile<br />

Template<br />

Sea bed<br />

Variably cemented shell s<strong>and</strong><br />

Stiff clay<br />

Limestone<br />

Observed deflection<br />

200 300 400 500 600 700<br />

Horizontal pull at top of pile (kN)<br />

Theoretical curve for<br />

fixity at R.C. template<br />

on sea bed<br />

Figure 8.9 Load/deflection curve for 1300 mm O.D. steel tubular pile due to horizontal load at head<br />

of pile (after Broadhead (8.2) ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!