25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 General principles <strong>and</strong> practices<br />

resistance of the ground multiplied by the appropriate safety factor. The latter takes into<br />

account the risks of excessive total <strong>and</strong> differential settlements of the structure as well as<br />

allowing for uncertainties in the design method <strong>and</strong> in the values selected for the shearing<br />

strength parameters.<br />

The settlements of the foundations are then calculated, the loading adopted for these<br />

calculations being not necessarily the same as that used to obtain the maximum working<br />

load. It is the usual practice to take the actual dead load <strong>and</strong> the whole or some proportion<br />

of the imposed load, depending on the type of loading, i.e. the full imposed load is taken for<br />

structures such as grain silos, but the imposed wind loading may not be taken into account<br />

when calculating long-term settlements.<br />

There is no reason why this dual approach should not be adopted when designing structures<br />

<strong>and</strong> their foundations, but it is important that the designer of the structure should make an<br />

unambiguous statement of the loading conditions which are to be supported by the ground. If<br />

he provides the foundation engineer with a factored ultimate load, <strong>and</strong> the foundation engineer<br />

then uses this load with a safety factor of, say, 2.5 or 3 on the calculated shearing resistance of<br />

the ground, the resulting design may be over-conservative. Similarly, if the ultimate load is<br />

used to calculate settlements, the values obtained will be unrealistically large. The foundation<br />

engineer must know the actual dead load of the superstructure <strong>and</strong> sub-structure <strong>and</strong> he must<br />

have full details of the imposed loading, i.e. its type, distribution <strong>and</strong> duration.<br />

Many of the conflicts between the design of structures <strong>and</strong> sub-structures to BS 8110 or similar<br />

structural codes, <strong>and</strong> the design of piled foundations to BS 8004 have been dealt with in BS<br />

EN 1997-1: 2004 Eurocode 7 (EC7), Geotechnical <strong>Design</strong> – Part 1 General rules (1.2) <strong>and</strong> BS EN<br />

1992-1: 2004 Eurocode 2 (EC2), <strong>Design</strong> of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1 General rules <strong>and</strong><br />

rules for buildings (1.3) . These two Eurocodes will partially supersede BS 8004 <strong>and</strong> BS 8110 (<strong>and</strong><br />

other related geotechnical st<strong>and</strong>ards). However, until all the Eurocode packages for designing<br />

the various parts of a structure are available together with the National Annexes, the British<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ards Institute advises that the current st<strong>and</strong>ards will remain valid for geotechnical investigation<br />

<strong>and</strong> design <strong>and</strong> concrete design ‘until further notice’. This ‘coexistence period’for EC7<br />

is likely to last for several years before the current st<strong>and</strong>ards are modified or withdrawn.<br />

EC7 has to be read in conjunction with BS EN 1990 Eurocode 0: Basis of Structural<br />

<strong>Design</strong> (1.4) <strong>and</strong> BS EN 1991-1 Eurocode 1: Part 1 Actions on Structures which ensure that<br />

partial factors are considered in a logical <strong>and</strong> uniform manner avoiding the application of<br />

global safety factors. In addition, reference has to be made to BSEN 1993-1: 2005 Eurocode 3<br />

(EC3): <strong>Design</strong> of Steel Structures, Part 1-1 General Rules <strong>and</strong> Part 5: 2007 (EC3-5) Piling<br />

<strong>and</strong> BS EN 1995-1: 2004 Eurocode 5 (EC5): <strong>Design</strong> of Timber Structures, Part 1-1 General<br />

Rules. It should be noted that new European St<strong>and</strong>ards have been published dealing with the<br />

‘execution of special geotechnical works’ (bored piling, displacement piles, sheet piles,<br />

micropiles, etc.) which have the status of current British St<strong>and</strong>ards (designated as ‘BS EN’).<br />

Clause 7 of EC7 deals with piled foundations from the aspects of actions on piles from<br />

superimposed loading or ground movements, design methods for piles subjected to<br />

compression, tension <strong>and</strong> lateral loading, pile-loading tests, structural design <strong>and</strong> supervision<br />

of construction. In using Clause 7 of EC7 the designer is required to demonstrate that the<br />

sum of the ultimate limit state components of bearing capacity of the pile or pile group<br />

(resistances ‘R’) exceeds the ultimate limit state design loading (actions ‘F’) <strong>and</strong> that the<br />

serviceability limit-state is not reached.<br />

The EC7 loading scenarios, defined as ‘actions’ in the Eurocodes, are designed to cover<br />

‘permanent unfavourable’, ‘permanent favourable’ <strong>and</strong> ‘variable’ situations <strong>and</strong> require the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!