25.12.2012 Views

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

Pile Design and Construction Practice, Fifth edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Brinch Hansen bearing capacity factors for � � 0� are obtained in the same way as<br />

shown above, giving N c � 5.2, s c � 1.05, d c � 1.3 <strong>and</strong> i c � 0.96.<br />

It is evident from the preceding calculation to obtain q ub that the third term in equation 5.1<br />

is small <strong>and</strong> can be neglected.<br />

Characteristic unit base resistance � 190 � 5.2 � 1.05 � 1.3 � 0.96 � 1294.7 kN/m 2 .<br />

Applying the R1 resistance factor of 1.0, design resistance � R cd � 1294.7 � 13.0 �<br />

3.1 � 52176 kN which is greater than the design action V' d of 30 000 kN.<br />

For <strong>Design</strong> Approach DA1, combination 2 (sets A2�M2�R1)<br />

<strong>Design</strong> actions, V' d � 1.0 � 30000 � 30000 kN<br />

<strong>and</strong> H' d � 1.3 � 1500 � 1950 kN<br />

Eccentricity of loading � 1950(35.0 � 13.7)/30000 � 3.2 m<br />

Width of equivalent block foundation � 10.4 � 2 � 3.2 � 4.0 m<br />

Dimensions of equivalent block foundation are 13.0 � 4.0 � 7.7 m deep<br />

The material factor, � cu, for set M2 is 1.4 <strong>and</strong> R1 is 1.0<br />

<strong>Design</strong> unit resistance to bearing failure 136 � 5.2 � 0.9 � 1.3 � 0.86 � 711.6 kN/m 2<br />

<strong>Design</strong> resistance of foundation � R cd � 711.6 � 13.0 � 4.0 � 37000 kN which is<br />

greater than V' d of 30000 kN<br />

DA1 is used to check compliance with EC7 with respect to sliding. In the following<br />

calculations the passive resistance of the soil to horizontal movement of the piles has been<br />

ignored.<br />

For DA1, combination 1, the base area of the equivalent block using the factored values<br />

of V' <strong>and</strong> H' is 13.0 � 3.1 � 40.3 m 2 . From Table 4.2, M1 is 1.0 <strong>and</strong> R1 for spread<br />

foundations in respect of sliding is 1.0. Therefore design resistance to sliding � 190 � 1.0 �<br />

1.0 � 40.3 � 7657 kN which is greater than H' d � 1.5 � 1500 � 2250 kN.<br />

For DA1, combination 2, base area � 13.0 � 4.0 � 52.0 m 2 , R cd � 1.0 � 136 � 52.0 �<br />

7072 kN which is greater than H� d � 1950 kN.<br />

It is also necessary to confirm that the total settlements <strong>and</strong> tilting of the structure are<br />

within safe limits. The following calculations are carried out using unfactored loadings to<br />

verify the serviceability limit-state.<br />

Calculating first the immediate <strong>and</strong> consolidation settlements under dead <strong>and</strong> imposed<br />

load, but excluding the wind load. Because the piles have under-reamed bases which carry<br />

the major proportion of the load, the base of the equivalent raft will be close to pile base<br />

level. The approximate overall dimensions of the equivalent raft outside the toes of the pile<br />

bases are 13.8 � 11.2 m. Therefore<br />

overall base pressure beneath raft �<br />

<strong>Pile</strong>s to resist uplift <strong>and</strong> lateral loading 371<br />

30 000<br />

13.8 � 11.2 � 194 kN/m 2<br />

Assume a value of E u for the glacial clay of 80 mN/m 2 <strong>and</strong> a value of m v of 0.05 m 2 /kN.<br />

From Figure 5.20 for L/B � 13.8/11.2 � 1.2, H/B ��<strong>and</strong> D/B � 7.7/11.2 � 0.69 (ignoring

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!