26.12.2012 Views

Okavango Delta Management Plan - Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

Okavango Delta Management Plan - Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

Okavango Delta Management Plan - Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

15000 in 1988 and 35000 in 2002 (B<strong>on</strong>y<strong>on</strong>go, 2004). Similarly, the numbers of two other<br />

large herbivores, Hippopotamus and Buffalo, have increased remarkably during the last<br />

fifteen years, while most small and medium sized herbivores have declined (op. cit.). The<br />

abundance of elephants is now so high that they may c<strong>on</strong>stitute a threat to woodlands,<br />

especially when c<strong>on</strong>sidering that about 25% of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g> is permanently wet and not used<br />

by elephants. The Hippopotamus numbers given at about 2500 are likely to be a minimum,<br />

due to the problems in aerial counting of these often submerged animals. For similar<br />

reas<strong>on</strong>s the numbers based <strong>on</strong> aerial counts given in Table 2-5 for Sitatunga and Kudu, are<br />

likely to be under-estimated.<br />

The total mammal biomass for the Moremi Game Reserve (7000 km 2) in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Okavango</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

has been estimated as being 12 000 kg/km 2 (B<strong>on</strong>y<strong>on</strong>go, 2004), which is much higher than<br />

for most wildlife areas in southern Africa and comparable with the rich savannas in the<br />

East African Rift valley. The regressi<strong>on</strong> models between rainfall (Coe, Cumming and<br />

Phillips<strong>on</strong>, 1976) and rainfall + nutrient level (East, 1984) estimates the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Okavango</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

mammalian biomass to be 4-8 times lower than what direct calculati<strong>on</strong>s generated for a<br />

system like the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Okavango</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g>. The high biomass densities of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Okavango</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

compared to the rich savannas is attributed to high numbers of elephants and buffalo who<br />

jointly c<strong>on</strong>tribute 73% of the total mammalian biomass in <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g> (B<strong>on</strong>y<strong>on</strong>go 2004). The two<br />

moisture regimes, from the annual rainfall and the annual seas<strong>on</strong>al flooding results in two<br />

distinct growing seas<strong>on</strong>s. This results to high productivity of foraging resources enabling<br />

the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g> to support high numbers of mammalian herbivores.<br />

Table 2-5: Comm<strong>on</strong> species and numbers<br />

Species Total number<br />

Elephant, Loxod<strong>on</strong>ta africana 35 000<br />

Zebra, Equus burchelli 14 000<br />

Warthog, Phacochoerus aethiopicus 2 000<br />

Hippopotamus, Hippopotamus amphibius 2 500<br />

Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis 5000<br />

Wildebeest, C<strong>on</strong>nochaetes taurinus 8 000<br />

Tsessebe, Damaliscus lunatus 3 000<br />

Impala, Aepyceros melampus 140 000<br />

Buffalo, Syncerus caffer 60 000<br />

Kudu, Tragelaphus strepsiceros 300<br />

Sitatunga, Tragelaphus spekei 500<br />

Red Lechwe, Kobus leche 60 000<br />

Number of comm<strong>on</strong> large mammals in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Okavango</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g> in 2002, calculated for an area of 20 000 km 2 , based <strong>on</strong> 10 aerial counts d<strong>on</strong>e<br />

1988 – 2002 by the Department of Wildlife and Nati<strong>on</strong>al Parks, Government of Botswana (from B<strong>on</strong>y<strong>on</strong>go, 2004). For Impala the numbers<br />

have been corrected based <strong>on</strong> ground counts<br />

The extended productive period caused by the annual flood is certainly <strong>on</strong>e of the causes<br />

for this. On the other hand the generally low nutrient levels in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g> should limit<br />

biological producti<strong>on</strong> (op. cit), but the dynamic vegetati<strong>on</strong> successi<strong>on</strong>s caused by flooding<br />

with periodically and locally high mobilizati<strong>on</strong> of nutrients may cause high nutrient levels<br />

for forbs and hence favourable producti<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for grazing mammals.<br />

Habitat assemblages<br />

All the comm<strong>on</strong> species menti<strong>on</strong>ed above, except the Buffalo, depend <strong>on</strong> more than <strong>on</strong>e<br />

habitat. For instance, the Impala inhabits floodplains and grasslands adjacent to riparian<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!