26.12.2012 Views

Okavango Delta Management Plan - Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

Okavango Delta Management Plan - Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

Okavango Delta Management Plan - Ramsar Convention on Wetlands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The central z<strong>on</strong>e is largely delineated <strong>on</strong> the basis of the buffalo fence and has wildlife as<br />

the main land use. This z<strong>on</strong>e encompasses most of the wetland area, and there is very little<br />

upland area. While dominated by the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Okavango</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g>, it also includes the Linyanti-Chobe<br />

wetland areas <strong>on</strong> the north eastern border of the study area. There are very few people<br />

living in this z<strong>on</strong>e, in a few scattered villages as well as in associati<strong>on</strong> with some of the<br />

larger tourist camps.<br />

2.7.1 DIRECT USE VALUES<br />

In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g>, direct use values are generated through crop producti<strong>on</strong>, livestock grazing,<br />

fishing, wild plant use and hunting. They are also generated through c<strong>on</strong>sumptive<br />

(hunting) and n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>sumptive (wildlife viewing) tourism. Rather than separating<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumptive and n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>sumptive value, as c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>ally d<strong>on</strong>e within the total ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

value framework, household use (largely c<strong>on</strong>sumptive) and tourism use (both c<strong>on</strong>sumptive<br />

and n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>sumptive) have been separated for ease of analysis. All values are in Pula for<br />

2005 (in that year 1 Pula was worth 0,19 US$)<br />

2.7.1.1 Household use of natural resources<br />

In the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Delta</str<strong>on</strong>g>, direct use values are generated through crop producti<strong>on</strong>, livestock grazing,<br />

fishing, wild plant use and hunting. They are also generated through c<strong>on</strong>sumptive<br />

(hunting) and n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>sumptive (wildlife viewing) tourism. Rather than separating<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sumptive and n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>sumptive value, as c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>ally d<strong>on</strong>e within the total ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

value framework, household use (largely c<strong>on</strong>sumptive) and tourism use (both c<strong>on</strong>sumptive<br />

and n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>sumptive) have been separated for ease of analysis. The values for direct use<br />

activities were estimated in private and ec<strong>on</strong>omic terms (see below). These activities,<br />

resulting from the use of the delta’s and the wetland’s resources, c<strong>on</strong>tribute directly to the<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>al product of Botswana. They also impact <strong>on</strong> the broader nati<strong>on</strong>al product indirectly<br />

through the multiplier effect. These multipliers and the indirect impact were also calculated<br />

separately using the social accounting matrix (SAM) model for Botswana. Selected direct<br />

use values provided in tables below, do not include the broader direct impacts. All values<br />

are in Pula for 2005 (in that year 1 Pula was worth 0,19 US$)<br />

2.7.1.1 Household use of natural resources<br />

Households in the study area traditi<strong>on</strong>ally derive their livelihoods from a variety of sources<br />

(Rashem,1988):<br />

• gathering, hunting and fishing,<br />

• livestock<br />

• arable farming<br />

• crafts, and<br />

• the formal sector.<br />

This multi-sectoral livelihood system allows households to spread risk, so that there is<br />

something to fall back <strong>on</strong> in years of crop failure or livestock death. The livestock sector is<br />

by far the most important c<strong>on</strong>tributor to rural subsistence and cash income, although there<br />

is some c<strong>on</strong>cern that it cannot maintain this status due to populati<strong>on</strong> growth and<br />

degradati<strong>on</strong> of pasture lands (Rashem 1988).<br />

Table 2-14 shows the direct private and ec<strong>on</strong>omic values associated with household<br />

agricultural activities in the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Ramsar</str<strong>on</strong>g> Site and the wetland. In the table, gross private value<br />

refers to the annual aggregate gross value of sales and own c<strong>on</strong>sumpti<strong>on</strong> for the activity,<br />

measured in market prices. Net private value refers to the annual aggregate profits for the<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!