08.01.2013 Views

DigitalVideoAndHDTVAlgorithmsAndInterfaces.pdf

DigitalVideoAndHDTVAlgorithmsAndInterfaces.pdf

DigitalVideoAndHDTVAlgorithmsAndInterfaces.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Many MPEG terms – such as<br />

frame, picture, and macroblock –<br />

can refer to elements of the<br />

source video, to the corresponding<br />

elements in the coded<br />

bitstream, or to the corresponding<br />

elements in the reconstructed<br />

video. It is generally clear<br />

from context which is meant.<br />

Symes, Peter, Video Compression<br />

Demystified (New York: McGraw-<br />

Hill, 2000).<br />

MPEG-2<br />

The MPEG-2 effort was initiated to extend MPEG-1 to<br />

interlaced scanning, to larger pictures, and to data rates<br />

much higher than 1.5 Mb/s. MPEG-2 is now widely<br />

deployed for the distribution of digital television,<br />

including standard-definition television (SDTV), DVD,<br />

and high-definition television (HDTV). MPEG-2 is<br />

defined by a series of standards from ISO/IEC.<br />

MPEG-2 accommodates both progressive and interlaced<br />

material. A video frame can be coded directly as<br />

a frame-structured picture. Alternatively, a video frame<br />

(typically originated from an interlaced source) may be<br />

coded as a pair of field-structured pictures – a top-field<br />

picture and a bottom-field picture. The two fields are<br />

time-offset by half the frame time, and are intended for<br />

interlaced display. Field pictures always come in pairs<br />

having opposite parity (top/bottom). Both pictures in<br />

a field pair have the same picture coding type (I, P, or<br />

B), except that an I-field may be followed by a P-field<br />

(in which case the pair is treated as an I-frame).<br />

While the MPEG-2 work was underway, an MPEG-3<br />

effort was launched to address HDTV. The MPEG-3<br />

committee concluded early on that MPEG-2, at high<br />

data rate, would accommodate HDTV. Consequently,<br />

the MPEG-3 effort was abandoned. MPEG-4, MPEG-7,<br />

and MPEG-21 are underway; the numbers have no<br />

plan. MPEG-4 is concerned with coding at very low bit<br />

rates. MPEG-7, titled Multimedia Content Description<br />

Interface, will standardize description of various types<br />

of multimedia information (metadata). MPEG-21 seeks<br />

to establish an open framework for multimedia delivery<br />

and consumption, thereby enabling use of multimedia<br />

resources across a wide range of networks and devices.”<br />

In my estimation, none of MPEGs 4, 7, or 21 are relevant<br />

to handling studio- or distribution-quality video<br />

signals.<br />

I will detail JPEG and motion-JPEG (M-JPEG) compression<br />

on page 447, DV compression on page 461, and<br />

MPEG-2 video compression on page 473. Video and<br />

audio compression technology is detailed in the book<br />

by Peter Symes cited in the margin.<br />

126 DIGITAL VIDEO AND HDTV ALGORITHMS AND INTERFACES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!