08.01.2013 Views

DigitalVideoAndHDTVAlgorithmsAndInterfaces.pdf

DigitalVideoAndHDTVAlgorithmsAndInterfaces.pdf

DigitalVideoAndHDTVAlgorithmsAndInterfaces.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I introduced twitter on page 57.<br />

Mitsuhashi, Tetsuo, “Scanning Specifications<br />

and Picture Quality,” in<br />

Fujio, T., et al., High Definition television,<br />

NHK Science and Technical<br />

Research Laboratories Technical<br />

Monograph 32 (June 1982).<br />

opinion, such numerical measures are so poorly defined<br />

and so unreliable that they are now useless. Hsu says:<br />

Kell factor is defined so ambiguously that individual<br />

researchers have justifiably used different theoretical<br />

and experimental techniques to derive widely varying<br />

values of k.<br />

Today I consider it poor science to quantify a Kell<br />

factor. However, Kell made an important contribution<br />

to television science, and I think it entirely fitting that<br />

we honor him with the Kell effect:<br />

In a video system – including sensor, signal processing,<br />

and display – Kell effect refers to the loss of resolution,<br />

compared to the Nyquist limit, caused by the spatial<br />

dispersion of light power. Some dispersion is necessary to<br />

avoid aliasing upon capture, and to avoid objectionable<br />

scan line (or pixel) structure at display.<br />

Kell’s 1934 paper concerned only progressive scanning.<br />

With the emergence of interlaced systems, it became<br />

clear that twitter resulted from excessive vertical detail.<br />

To reduce twitter to tolerable levels, it was necessary to<br />

reduce vertical resolution to substantially below that of<br />

a well-designed progressive system having the same<br />

spot size – for a progressive system with a given k, an<br />

interlaced system having the same spot size had to have<br />

lower k. Many people have lumped this consideration<br />

into “Kell factor,” but researchers such as Mitsuhashi<br />

identify this reduction separately as an interlace factor<br />

or interlace coefficient.<br />

Resolution<br />

SDTV (at roughly 720×480), HDTV at 1280×720, and<br />

HDTV at 1920×1080 all have different pixel counts.<br />

Image quality delivered by a particular number of pixels<br />

depends upon the nature of the image data (e.g.,<br />

whether the data is raster-locked or Nyquist-filtered),<br />

and upon the nature of the display device (e.g.,<br />

whether it has box or Gaussian reconstruction).<br />

In computing, unfortunately, the term resolution has<br />

come to refer simply to the count of vertical and hori-<br />

68 DIGITAL VIDEO AND HDTV ALGORITHMS AND INTERFACES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!