12.01.2013 Views

Mainly on the Elbe River - Central Europe

Mainly on the Elbe River - Central Europe

Mainly on the Elbe River - Central Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.1.4 Price comparis<strong>on</strong> of individual transport modes in particular relati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

It is appropriate to compare prices <strong>on</strong> specific routes with identical initial and final points. For <strong>the</strong><br />

purposes of <strong>the</strong> study, <strong>the</strong> Hamburg - Děčín relati<strong>on</strong> was selected.<br />

3.1.4.1 The Hamburg – Děčín relati<strong>on</strong><br />

Generally, <strong>the</strong> prices of cargo transport are determined by agreement. For road transport, <strong>the</strong><br />

price is not calculated per t<strong>on</strong>s or t<strong>on</strong>e-kilometers, but per vehicle-kilometers with almost no regard<br />

to <strong>the</strong> load. 15 For railway transport, different price is charged for full wag<strong>on</strong> load and for a whole<br />

train (lower price). Therefore, <strong>the</strong> following comparis<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>ly of informati<strong>on</strong>al character.<br />

To enable <strong>the</strong> comparis<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> transport prices by road, railway and inland water routes,<br />

single transport load of 1.050 t<strong>on</strong>s is c<strong>on</strong>sidered as a unit, which corresp<strong>on</strong>ds with <strong>the</strong> load of <strong>on</strong>e<br />

vessel with <strong>the</strong> draft of 2,2 m for water transport, 22 wag<strong>on</strong>s of 47 t<strong>on</strong>s load capacity for railway<br />

transport and 42 cargo trucks with 25 t<strong>on</strong>s of average load capacity for road network.<br />

Note: The average load of <strong>the</strong> cargo vessel <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Elbe</strong> river is comm<strong>on</strong>ly stated as 1.000 t. 16<br />

To simplify <strong>the</strong> comparis<strong>on</strong> for purposes of this project, a cargo weight was set to 1.050 t. The<br />

difference of 5 % from <strong>the</strong> actual figure is insignificant for <strong>the</strong> final evaluati<strong>on</strong>. The average weight<br />

of a load 1.050 t<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>the</strong> Hamburg - Děčín relati<strong>on</strong> was adopted from <strong>the</strong> study<br />

“Verkehrswirtschaftlicher und ökologischer Vergleich der Verkehrsträger Straße, Bahn und<br />

Wasserstraße (PLANCO C<strong>on</strong>sulting GmbH, lisOPTad 2007)“.<br />

Due to different lengths of routes for individual modes of transport, it is necessary to compare<br />

<strong>the</strong> total price for transportati<strong>on</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> transported unit (t<strong>on</strong>s km).<br />

The all-in price for transportati<strong>on</strong> is understood as complete and final. It includes all necessary<br />

expenses, i.e. fees for traffic routes and similar fees paid by <strong>the</strong> actual transporter <strong>on</strong> behalf of <strong>the</strong><br />

final client. The price is calculated as costs of realizing <strong>the</strong> transportati<strong>on</strong> plus <strong>the</strong> transport reward<br />

including o<strong>the</strong>r possible expenses. The all-in price is presented as a total sum invoiced to <strong>the</strong><br />

client.<br />

15 The fact, that <strong>the</strong> prices for road transport are calculated in vehicle-kilometers, was verified by <strong>the</strong> ČESMAD Bohemia<br />

company.<br />

16 Source: „The improvement of c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s in navigati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Elbe</strong> between Ústí nad Labem-state border CR-Germany<br />

– Děčín navigati<strong>on</strong> degree (CITYPLAN spol. s r.o. – 2010)<br />

A feasibility study for “Improvement of C<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>the</strong> <strong>River</strong> Transport in <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> (mainly <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Elbe</strong><br />

<strong>River</strong>)“ realized within <strong>the</strong> ChemLog project 132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!