30.01.2013 Views

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Long-Distance Runners of <strong>the</strong> Civil Rights Movement \\ 141<br />

There is little <strong>in</strong>dication that o<strong>the</strong>r Jews were exert<strong>in</strong>g (or seek<strong>in</strong>g to exert) <strong>the</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>d of heavy-handed <strong>in</strong>fluence that was Stern's stock <strong>in</strong> trade. In Stern's case,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sistence on l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g fund<strong>in</strong>g and control had significant consequences<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Urban League; preserv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> organization's <strong>in</strong>dependence and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity carried real costs. The Rosenwald Fund reduced and eventually withdrew<br />

its support of <strong>the</strong> National Urban League dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1930s. As well, Stern<br />

resigned from <strong>the</strong> board of <strong>the</strong> Chicago Urban League and persuaded Rosenwald<br />

to withdraw his support. Stern also campaigned, albeit with little success, to get<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r foundations and bus<strong>in</strong>esses to follow suit. The cumulative effect of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

moves, com<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> eve of <strong>the</strong> depression, was to gravely threaten <strong>the</strong> Chicago<br />

affiliate's f<strong>in</strong>ancial security. 52<br />

There is little <strong>in</strong>dication that o<strong>the</strong>r Jews were exert<strong>in</strong>g (or seek<strong>in</strong>g to exert) <strong>the</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>d of heavy-handed <strong>in</strong>fluence that was Stern's stock <strong>in</strong> trade. In Stern's case,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sistence on l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g fund<strong>in</strong>g and control had significant consequences<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Urban League; preserv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> organization's <strong>in</strong>dependence and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrity carried real costs. The Rosenwald Fund reduced and eventually withdrew<br />

its support of <strong>the</strong> National Urban League dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1930s. As well, Stern<br />

resigned from <strong>the</strong> board of <strong>the</strong> Chicago Urban League and persuaded Rosenwald<br />

to withdraw his support. Stern also campaigned, albeit with little success, to get<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r foundations and bus<strong>in</strong>esses to follow suit. The cumulative effect of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

moves, com<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> eve of <strong>the</strong> depression, was to gtavely threaten <strong>the</strong> Chicago<br />

affiliate's f<strong>in</strong>ancial security. 52<br />

//<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Jews, less <strong>in</strong>trusive than <strong>the</strong> Rosenwald Fund, played major roles <strong>in</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Urban League. 53 O<strong>the</strong>r Jews, less <strong>in</strong>trusive than <strong>the</strong> Rosenwald Fund, played major roles <strong>in</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Urban League. The League's rolls carried <strong>the</strong> names of <strong>the</strong><br />

great German Jewish bank<strong>in</strong>g families of New York. Sachses, Schiffs, Seligmans,<br />

and Warburgs were steady donors from <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> League's found<strong>in</strong>g; <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

1920s, no fewer than ten Sachses and eight Seligmans made annual contributions,<br />

and Goldmans, Guggenheims, and Wer<strong>the</strong>ims showed up as regular donors as<br />

well. Despite <strong>the</strong> great wealth of <strong>the</strong>se families, some of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>dividual contributions<br />

were very small — $25, $50, $100, $250 a year. But Jewish donors held a<br />

disproportionate place among <strong>the</strong> handful of <strong>in</strong>dividuals who made <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

annual gifts. A thousand dollars was a major gift <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> League's early decades —<br />

<strong>in</strong> a typical year <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1920s, for example, <strong>the</strong>re would be five or six <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

donors who made gifts of that size, two or three of whom would be Jews. (In addition<br />

to Rosenwald, <strong>the</strong>se donors <strong>in</strong>cluded Samuel and Louise Goldman Sachs, who<br />

made substantial annual gifts after <strong>the</strong>ir daughter Ella's death <strong>in</strong> 1922, and Felix<br />

and Frieda Schiff Warburg, who became major donors beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1927.) From<br />

time to time, too, Jews were <strong>the</strong> source of unusual, outsized benefactions.<br />

It was <strong>the</strong> private foundations, however, that made <strong>the</strong> critical difference <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> National Urban League's f<strong>in</strong>ancial survival, and here, too, Jews played a major<br />

role. In <strong>the</strong> 1920s, <strong>the</strong> average annual <strong>in</strong>come of <strong>the</strong> National Urban League was<br />

$55,100 (<strong>the</strong> range was roughly from $26,000 to $75,000). The Rockefellers provided<br />

<strong>the</strong> lion's share of <strong>the</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g: throughout <strong>the</strong> decade, <strong>the</strong> Laura Spelman<br />

Rockefeller Memorial alone accounted for one-fifth to one-sixth of <strong>the</strong> League's<br />

annual <strong>in</strong>come; for <strong>the</strong> period 1925-29, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., himself, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Memorial (or, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1929, its successor, <strong>the</strong> Spelman Fund of<br />

New York), accounted for more than one quarter. The National Urban League<br />

attracted only two o<strong>the</strong>r regular contributors of comparable size. One was <strong>the</strong><br />

Carnegie Corporation of New York, which made annual grants of $8,000 for five<br />

years <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1920s and <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r years contributed upward of $2,500. The o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

was <strong>the</strong> Altman Foundation, established <strong>in</strong> 1913 by <strong>the</strong> German Jewish merchant<br />

53 The League's rolls carried <strong>the</strong> names of <strong>the</strong><br />

great German Jewish bank<strong>in</strong>g families of New York. Sachses, Schiffs, Seligmans,<br />

and Warburgs were steady donors from <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> League's found<strong>in</strong>g; <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

1920s, no fewer than ten Sachses and eight Seligmans made annual contributions,<br />

and Goldmans, Guggenheims, and Wer<strong>the</strong>ims showed up as regular donors as<br />

well. Despite <strong>the</strong> great wealth of <strong>the</strong>se families, some of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>dividual contributions<br />

were very small—$25, $50, $100, $250 a year. But Jewish donors held a<br />

disproportionate place among <strong>the</strong> handful of <strong>in</strong>dividuals who made <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

annual gifts. A thousand dollars was a major gift <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> League's early decades—<br />

<strong>in</strong> a typical year <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1920s, for example, <strong>the</strong>re would be five or six <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

donors who made gifts of that size, two or three of whom would be Jews. (In addition<br />

to Rosenwald, <strong>the</strong>se donors <strong>in</strong>cluded Samuel and Louise Goldman Sachs, who<br />

made substantial annual gifts after <strong>the</strong>ir daughter Ella's death <strong>in</strong> 1922, and Felix<br />

and Frieda Schiff Warburg, who became major donors beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1927.) From<br />

time to time, too, Jews were <strong>the</strong> source of unusual, outsized benefactions.<br />

It was <strong>the</strong> private foundations, however, that made <strong>the</strong> critical difference <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> National Urban League's f<strong>in</strong>ancial survival, and here, too, Jews played a major<br />

role. In <strong>the</strong> 1920s, <strong>the</strong> average annual <strong>in</strong>come of <strong>the</strong> National Urban League was<br />

$55,100 (<strong>the</strong> range was roughly from $26,000 to $75,000). The Rockefellers provided<br />

<strong>the</strong> lion's share of <strong>the</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g: throughout <strong>the</strong> decade, <strong>the</strong> Laura Spelman<br />

Rockefeller Memorial alone accounted for one-fifth to one-sixth of <strong>the</strong> League's<br />

annual <strong>in</strong>come; for <strong>the</strong> period 1925-29, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., himself, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Memorial (or, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1929, its successor, <strong>the</strong> Spelman Fund of<br />

New York), accounted for more than one quarter. The National Urban League<br />

attracted only two o<strong>the</strong>r regular contributors of comparable size. One was <strong>the</strong><br />

Carnegie Corporation of New York, which made annual grants of $8,000 for five<br />

years <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1920s and <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r years contributed upward of $2,500. The o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

was <strong>the</strong> Altman Foundation, established <strong>in</strong> 1913 by <strong>the</strong> German Jewish merchant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!