30.01.2013 Views

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 // NANCY J.WEISS<br />

34. Walter White, A Man Called White: The Autobiography of Walter White (New<br />

York, 1948), pp. 47-53; Ov<strong>in</strong>gton, The Walls Came Tumbl<strong>in</strong>g Down, pp. 154-63;<br />

Kellogg, NAACP, pp. 242-45; Meier and Rudwick, "Attorneys Black and White,"<br />

pp. 138-39; Louis Marshall to Walter White, Mar. 12, 1923, New York Foundation<br />

Archives, folder marked "NAACP— General, Prior to 1940," New York Foundation,<br />

New York City.<br />

35. New York Amsterdam. News, Apr. 16, 1930 (Miller), quoted <strong>in</strong> Bloom,<br />

"Interactions between Blacks and Jews," p. 284; Cyrus Adler, "Louis Marshall, A<br />

Biographical Sketch," <strong>in</strong> Louis Marshall: A Biographical Sketch by Cyrus Adler and<br />

Memorial Addresses by Cyrus Adler, Irv<strong>in</strong>g Lehman, Horace Stern (New York, 1931), p. 65.<br />

Corrigan v, Buckley <strong>in</strong>volved "<strong>the</strong> validity of a restrictive covenant <strong>in</strong> an agreement<br />

between <strong>the</strong> owners of private property"; <strong>the</strong> Court "held that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibitions of <strong>the</strong><br />

constitutional provisions <strong>in</strong>voked applied only to government action as dist<strong>in</strong>guished<br />

from that of private <strong>in</strong>dividuals" (Reznikoff, ed., Louis Marshall, I, 465 n.). In 1948,<br />

<strong>in</strong> Shelley v. Kraemer, <strong>the</strong> Court embraced Marshall's argument that privately arranged<br />

restrictive covenants were not legally enforceable. (On Marshall's role <strong>in</strong> Corrigan v.<br />

Buckley, see his correspondence with James Weldon Johnson [Sept. 25, 1924],<br />

Moorfield Storey {Dec. 12, 1924, Sept. 24, 1925], and Senator William E. Borah<br />

[Apr. 19, 1926], <strong>in</strong> ibid., pp. 459-65.) In Nixon v. Herndon, <strong>the</strong> Court accepted<br />

Marshall's argument that a state law barr<strong>in</strong>g Blacks from participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Democratic<br />

Party primary elections <strong>in</strong> Texas violated <strong>the</strong> Fourteenth Amendment. (See Marshall's<br />

brief <strong>in</strong> ibid., pp. 426—47.) In Nixon v. Condon, <strong>the</strong> Court <strong>in</strong>validated a Texas law giv-<br />

<strong>in</strong>g political parties <strong>the</strong> power to prescribe <strong>the</strong> qualifications of <strong>the</strong>ir members on <strong>the</strong><br />

grounds that <strong>the</strong>y were, <strong>in</strong> effect, act<strong>in</strong>g as agents of <strong>the</strong> state. (On Nixon v. Condon,<br />

see Marshall's correspondence with William T. Andrews [Jan. 26, 1929} and Fred C.<br />

Knollenberg [Apr. 17, 1929], <strong>in</strong> ibid., pp. 447-59, and James Marshall Oral History<br />

Memoir, Apr. 11, June 6, 1974, pp. 67, 151, American Jewish Committee's Oral<br />

History Collection, Jewish Division, New York Public Library.)<br />

36. Irv<strong>in</strong>g Lehman memorial address, Nov. 10, 1929, <strong>in</strong> Louis Marshall: A<br />

Biographical Sketch...and Memorial Addresses, p. 93 (source of <strong>the</strong> quote); Morton<br />

Rosenstock, Louis Marshall: Defender a/Jewish Rights (Detroit, 1965), pp. 28, 274;<br />

James Marshall Oral History Memoir, Apr. 11, 1974, pp. 69-70.<br />

37. Marshall quoted <strong>in</strong> D<strong>in</strong>er, In <strong>the</strong> Almost <strong>Promised</strong> Land, pp. 151—52; Segal<br />

quoted <strong>in</strong> ibid., p. 1 32; Adler, "Louis Marshall, A Biographical Sketch," pp. 20—21.<br />

38. Meier and Rudwick, "Attorneys Black and White," p. 141 (White quote);<br />

Mark V. Tushnet, The NAACP's Legal Strategy aga<strong>in</strong>st Segregated Education, 1925—1950<br />

(Chapel Hill, 1987), chs. 1-2 (Margold Report quoted on p. 28); Richard Kluger,<br />

Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for<br />

Equality (New York, 1975), pp. 166-69, 232-33 (Hastie quote is on p. 169).<br />

39. D<strong>in</strong>er, In <strong>the</strong> Almost <strong>Promised</strong> Land, pp. 133-^42; Cyrus Adler, Jacob H. Schiff:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!