30.01.2013 Views

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

Jack Salzman, Cornel West Struggles in the Promised

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

318 // JEROME A. CHANES<br />

public-policy matters, that position is articulated <strong>in</strong> NJCRAC's annual Jo<strong>in</strong>t Program<br />

Plan.<br />

10. As early as 1963, however, <strong>the</strong> American Jewish Committee had developed a<br />

"Statement on Quotas and Race Relations." (See note 19-)<br />

11. 1969-70 JPP, p. 14.<br />

12. The analysis was developed by Albert D. Chern<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Philadelphia JCRC,<br />

and fur<strong>the</strong>r explored by Benjam<strong>in</strong> Epste<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Anti-Defamation League and Bert<br />

Gold of <strong>the</strong> American Jewish Committee, at <strong>the</strong> session on affirmative action at <strong>the</strong><br />

1971 NJCRAC Plenum Session.<br />

13. The <strong>in</strong>tensity of <strong>the</strong> debate was reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that a roll-call vote was<br />

necessary to tally <strong>the</strong> votes of <strong>the</strong> delegates.<br />

14. 1972-73 JPP, p. 23.<br />

15. The Anti-Defamation League, <strong>the</strong> Jewish Labor Committee, and <strong>the</strong> Union<br />

of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America were not <strong>in</strong> agreement with <strong>the</strong> recommended<br />

position on goals and timetables, and <strong>the</strong>refore dissented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Program Plan. (These agencies did not record a dissent at <strong>the</strong> Plenum.) The National<br />

Council of Jewish Women—flip-flopp<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> years on affirmative action—<br />

did not formally dissent from <strong>the</strong> position, but dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> debate jo<strong>in</strong>ed those national<br />

agencies <strong>in</strong> oppos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> position.<br />

16. 1973-74 JPP, p. 35.<br />

17. 1974-76 JPP, pp. 27-29.<br />

18. "Among <strong>the</strong> relevant qualifications for certa<strong>in</strong> posts <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> circumstances..^<br />

particular race or religious or ethnic group may be one," from 1973-74<br />

JPP, p. 28. See as well 1970-71 JPP.<br />

19. On this issue <strong>the</strong>re was dissent by a number of NJCRAC agencies. See<br />

1973-74 JPP, pp. 27-28.<br />

20. See Appendix.<br />

21. Marc D. Stern, "Affirmative Action, <strong>the</strong> Law, and <strong>the</strong> Jews," <strong>in</strong> Survey of Jewish<br />

Affairs 1990 (London: Institute of Jewish Affairs, 1990), 147-48.<br />

22. See, for example, Larry M. Lav<strong>in</strong>sky, "Preferential Treatment: A Legal View,"<br />

ADL Bullet<strong>in</strong> (January 1973): 1-2, 6-8.<br />

23. ADL policy statements, October 1969 and January 1972.<br />

24. American Jewish Committee, "Statement on Affirmative Action," 1977. AJC<br />

was <strong>the</strong> first of <strong>the</strong> agencies to take a stab at develop<strong>in</strong>g a cohesive approach to<br />

affirmative action. In November 1963, <strong>the</strong> AJC Executive Board issued a "Statement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!