02.02.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 10th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis

Proceedings of the 10th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis

Proceedings of the 10th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

#69 In vitro susceptibility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis to antibacterial drugs<br />

individually and in combinati<strong>on</strong> with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> immunosuppressive drug 6-mercaptopurine<br />

Manju Y Krishnan, Elizabeth JB Manning, Michael T Collins<br />

Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pathobiological Sciences, School <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Veterinary Medicine, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin-Madis<strong>on</strong>, USA<br />

Objectives: To determine 1) <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> in vitro antibiotic susceptibility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> M. avium ss. paratuberculosis (MAP) and<br />

compare to those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> M. a. hominisuiss (MAH) and M. a. avium (MAA) and 2) <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> immunosuppressive<br />

drug 6-mercaptopurine–antibiotic interacti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> in vitro growth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> MAP.<br />

Materials and Methods: Clinical isolates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> MAP (n=18, human and animal origin), MAH (n=10) and<br />

MAA (n=5) were used. The MICs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 11 antibiotics were determined by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> method adapted for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

BACTECTM MGITTM 960 culture system. Drug interacti<strong>on</strong>s were tested by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> chequer board method adapted<br />

for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> MGITTM 960 system and interpreted based <strong>on</strong> fracti<strong>on</strong>al inhibitory c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> (FIC) indices.<br />

Results: In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> interpretative criteria specific to MAP, those for M. avium complex were used<br />

to define susceptibility. Azithromycin and clarithromycin were <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most effective (100% isolates) against MAP,<br />

followed by amikacin (83.3%), cipr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>loxacin (55.5%), lev<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>loxacin (50%), rifampicin (44.4%) and rifabutin<br />

(38.8%). Twenty two percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> isolates were ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r susceptible or moderately susceptible (≤0.3 µg/mL) to<br />

cl<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>azimine. Cl<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>azimine MICs for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> resistant isolates ranged between 0.6 or 1.2 µg/mL, which may indicate<br />

in vivo susceptibility, since <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drug is known to c<strong>on</strong>centrate in tissues. Ethambutol was effective against 28%<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> isolates, but is<strong>on</strong>iazid and daps<strong>on</strong>e were completely ineffective. MAP was more susceptible to amikacin<br />

than MAH and MAA, less susceptible to rifamycins than MAH, and more susceptible to ethambutol than MAA.<br />

Synergism was observed when 6-mercaptopurine was combined with azithromycin/clarithromycin/rifamycin /<br />

ethambutol for multiple MAP human isolates. No antag<strong>on</strong>ism was observed with any <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drugs tested.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

- MAP strains are susceptible to macrolides>amikacin>fluroquinol<strong>on</strong>es=rifamycins><br />

cl<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>azimine=ethambutol;<br />

- MAP strains are more susceptible to amikacin than are MAH and MAA, but relatively less susceptible to<br />

rifamycins than MAH;<br />

- 6-mercaptopurine may be synergistic with macrolides and rifamycins against MAP.<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!