The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane
The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane
The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>and</strong> immersed hybrid PAC–<strong>MBR</strong> (Kim <strong>and</strong> Lee, 2003). Decreased membrane fouling<br />
has also been demonstrated in studies <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> dosing <strong>MBR</strong> supernatant at<br />
up to 1 g/L PAC (Lesage et al., 2005) <strong>and</strong> dosing activated sludge itself (Li et al.,<br />
2005c), for which an optimum PAC concentration <strong>of</strong> 1.2 g/L was recorded. In the<br />
latter study, floc size distribution <strong>and</strong> apparent biomass viscosity were identified as<br />
being the main parameters influenced, resulting in a reduced cake resistance, when<br />
PAC was dosed into the bioreactor. Conversely, no significant improvement in performance<br />
was recorded when a concentration <strong>of</strong> 5 g/L <strong>of</strong> PAC was maintained in the<br />
bioreactor without sludge wastage (Ng et al., 2005). It was postulated that, under<br />
these conditions, the PAC was rapidly saturated with organic pollutants <strong>and</strong> that fouling<br />
suppression by PAC relies on its regular addition brought about by lower SRTs.<br />
Experiments conducted with different system configurations based on immersed HF<br />
membranes allowed direct comparison <strong>of</strong> hydraulic performances for pre-flocculation<br />
<strong>and</strong> PAC addition. Under the operating conditions employed, pre-flocculation provided<br />
higher fouling mitigation than that <strong>of</strong> PAC addition (Guo et al., 2004).<br />
However, the use <strong>of</strong> both strategies simultaneously provided the greatest permeability<br />
enhancement (Cao et al., 2005; Guo et al., 2004).<br />
A detailed mathematical model has been proposed for predicting performances for<br />
hybrid PAC–<strong>MBR</strong> systems (Tsai et al., 2004). <strong>The</strong> model encompasses sub-processes<br />
such as biological reaction in bulk liquid solution, film transfer from bulk liquid phase<br />
to the bi<strong>of</strong>ilm, diffusion with biological reaction inside the bi<strong>of</strong>ilm, adsorption equilibria<br />
at the bi<strong>of</strong>ilm–adsorbent interface <strong>and</strong> diffusion within the PAC particles. Numerous<br />
other studies in which the use <strong>of</strong> PAC has been reported for fouling amelioration have<br />
generally been limited in scope <strong>and</strong> have not addressed the cost implications <strong>of</strong> reagent<br />
usage <strong>and</strong> sludge disposal. Tests have been performed using zeolite (Lee et al., 2001b)<br />
<strong>and</strong> aerobic granular sludge, with an average size around 1 mm (Li et al., 2005b) to<br />
create granular flocs <strong>of</strong> lower specific resistance. Granular sludge was found to increase<br />
membrane permeability by 50% but also lower the permeability recovery from cleaning<br />
by 12%, which would be likely to lead to unsustainable operation.<br />
A novel “membrane performance enhancer” MPE50, a cationic polymer-based<br />
compound, has recently been developed by the company Nalco for use in <strong>MBR</strong>s. <strong>The</strong><br />
addition <strong>of</strong> 1 g/L <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the reagent directly to the bioreactor led to the reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
SMPc from 41 to 21 mg/L (Yoon et al., 2005). <strong>The</strong> interaction between the polymer<br />
<strong>and</strong> the soluble organics in general, <strong>and</strong> SMPc in particular, was identified as being<br />
the main mechanism responsible for the performance enhancement. In another<br />
example, an <strong>MBR</strong> operated at an MLSS level as high as 45 g/L yielded a lower fouling<br />
propensity when 2.2 g/L <strong>of</strong> polymer was dosed into the bioreactor. <strong>The</strong> product has<br />
been tested at full scale (Section 5.2.1.4).<br />
2.4 Summary<br />
Fundamentals 99<br />
<strong>Membrane</strong> separation processes applied to <strong>MBR</strong>s have conventionally been limited to<br />
MF <strong>and</strong> UF for separation <strong>of</strong> the permeate product from the bioreactor MLSS. Other<br />
processes, in which the membrane is used to support a biomass <strong>and</strong> facilitate gas<br />
transfer into the bi<strong>of</strong>ilm (Section 2.3.2–2.3.3), have not reached the commercial