04.02.2013 Views

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

236 <strong>The</strong> <strong>MBR</strong> <strong>Book</strong><br />

Table 5.12 <strong>Membrane</strong> characteristics <strong>and</strong> maintenance, Perthes<br />

en Gatinais plant<br />

Parameter Value<br />

TMP range 0.2–0.5 bar<br />

Backwash frequency <strong>and</strong> duration Every 10 min for 45 s<br />

CIP Once a week with hypochlorite<br />

External chemical cleaning Hypochlorite/acid soak 1–4 times a year<br />

Coarse bubble aeration is applied at a rate <strong>of</strong> 1 m 3 /h per m 2 membrane area. <strong>The</strong><br />

permeability is routinely between 70 <strong>and</strong> 120 LMH/bar over the range <strong>of</strong> TMP indicated<br />

in Table 5.12. Regular flushing, around once every 10 min, together with the<br />

CIP procedures outlined (Table 5.12), enable the required steady-state flux rates to<br />

be maintained. External recovery cleaning with sodium hypoclorite is conducted by<br />

taking the membrane out <strong>of</strong> the aeration tank <strong>and</strong> transferring it to an adjacent<br />

cleaning tank where both cleaning chemical reagents (acid <strong>and</strong> sodium hypochlorite)<br />

<strong>and</strong> cleaning durations can be employed more flexibly. Cassettes in the aeration<br />

tank can be backflushed separately, <strong>and</strong> the backflushing process dem<strong>and</strong>s<br />

around 25% <strong>of</strong> the product permeate.<br />

Full nutrient removal is achieved by the plant. Phosphate removal is achieved by<br />

dosing ferric chloride into the effluent, the phosphate being removed with the excess<br />

sludge. <strong>The</strong> resulting excess sludge production, including the solids created by chemical<br />

dosing, is around 0.5 kg TSS/kg COD.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dewatering unit consists <strong>of</strong> a sludge thickener combined with a belt press. <strong>The</strong><br />

total sludge production is �270 kg/day. To achieve a satisfactory thickness <strong>of</strong> 16%<br />

after the belt press, a polymer dose <strong>of</strong> 6 kg/ton DS is required. After dewatering, the<br />

solids content <strong>of</strong> the sludge product is increased <strong>and</strong> the sludge is further stabilised<br />

with lime at a rate <strong>of</strong> 0.52 kg CaO/kg. <strong>The</strong> end product (Fig. 5.22) has a DS concentration<br />

25 wt% <strong>and</strong> is distributed to local farmers <strong>and</strong> disposed to l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

5.3.1.2 Brescia sewage treatment works<br />

Background At the existing conventional plant at Brescia, the Verziano WWTP had<br />

three trains, each consisting <strong>of</strong> primary clarification, biological oxidation, secondary<br />

clarification <strong>and</strong> final chlorination (Fig. 5.24). Pretreatment <strong>of</strong> the incoming<br />

untreated wastewater prior to the three trains was undertaken by coarse <strong>and</strong> fine<br />

screening <strong>and</strong> with s<strong>and</strong> for oil <strong>and</strong> grease removal. Trains A <strong>and</strong> C were identical in<br />

design capacity, treating 24 MLD each, while Train B had an original capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

12 MLD. Shortly after assuming operations at the Verziano WWTP in July 1995, the<br />

water company ASM Brescia undertook a series <strong>of</strong> evaluations <strong>and</strong> identified problems<br />

relating to additional discharges. <strong>The</strong> most significant problem was plant capacity,<br />

which was about two-thirds <strong>of</strong> that required. In response, several important<br />

projects were undertaken over the subsequent 5-year period (1995–2000) to remedy<br />

these issues.<br />

<strong>The</strong> principal remedial step was the upgrading <strong>of</strong> Train B, the oldest <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

trains, from 12 MLD to 38 MLD annual average flow capacity by converting the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!