04.02.2013 Views

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

on discharged P levels have been imposed (Section 5.2.1.4, Running Springs).<br />

P removal is more commonly achieved by dosing with chemicals, such as metal<br />

coagulants or lime, that can form sparingly soluble precipitates.<br />

2.2.7 Anaerobic treatment<br />

Compared with aerobic processes, anaerobic biological treatment is characterised<br />

by (Stephenson et al., 2000):<br />

● a lower energy dem<strong>and</strong> due to the absence <strong>of</strong> aeration<br />

● slower microbial growth<br />

● a lower COD removal (generally 60–90%)<br />

● no nitrification<br />

● greater potential for odour generation<br />

● longer start up (months cf. weeks)<br />

● higher alkalinity<br />

● lower sludge production<br />

● biogas (methane) generation.<br />

Fundamentals 53<br />

Conventional anaerobic treatment process configurations are all designed to<br />

achieve both good mixing <strong>and</strong> sludge separation. A number <strong>of</strong> configurations exist:<br />

(a) Simple contacting coupled with external sludge separation (by sedimentation,<br />

rotary vacuum filtration, etc.) <strong>and</strong>/or digestion before returning the clarified<br />

liquid to the reactor. This is a simple <strong>and</strong> relatively easily controlled process<br />

but is also made expensive by the pumping operations.<br />

(b) Anaerobic filters, which are flooded media filters based on either packed or<br />

structured media.<br />

(c) Upflow clarification using the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB, Fig.<br />

2.21a) reactor (Lettinga <strong>and</strong> Vinken, 1980), in which sludge particles settle at<br />

the same rate as the water flows upwards, forming a stationary “blanket” <strong>of</strong><br />

sludge in the reactor. This process relies on the formation <strong>of</strong> a dense granular<br />

sludge bed that is readily retained in the reactor, in much the same way as secondary<br />

clarification in the ASP relies on the growth <strong>of</strong> large settleable particles.<br />

<strong>The</strong> process is augmented in the exp<strong>and</strong>ed granular sludge bed (EGSB, Fig. 2.21b)<br />

which provides better influent distribution to improve contact between the<br />

sludge <strong>and</strong> wastewater <strong>and</strong> so promote more efficient use <strong>of</strong> the entire reactor<br />

volume (Seghezzo et al., 1998). In this configuration, the sludge bed is exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

by operating at higher upflow rates <strong>and</strong> the reactor behaves as a completely<br />

mixed tank (Rinzema, 1988).<br />

(d) Staged reactor systems, based on plug flow (Van Lier, 1995) <strong>and</strong> using sequentially<br />

operated reactors or compartments within a single reactor. Staged reactors<br />

include anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs, Fig. 2.21c) in which baffles are<br />

used to direct the flow <strong>of</strong> wastewater in an upflow mode through a series <strong>of</strong><br />

sludge blanket reactors (Metcalfe <strong>and</strong> Eddy, 2003). <strong>The</strong> process is more tolerant<br />

to non-settling particles than the UASB <strong>and</strong> EGSBs whilst still providing long<br />

solid retention times.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!