The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane
The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane
The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fundamentals 77<br />
in the influent. Abundance <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes such as Nocardia or Microthrix are<br />
commonly related to foaming in activated sludge plants, <strong>and</strong> have been identified in a<br />
full-scale <strong>MBR</strong> plant subject to variable OLRs (Smith, 2006). However, foam in <strong>MBR</strong><br />
plants has been observed in the absence <strong>of</strong> actinomycetes. <strong>The</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> foaming is<br />
reported as being related to the protein EPS concentrations (Nakajima <strong>and</strong> Mishima,<br />
2005). Foaming sludges also appear to yield lower membrane permeabilities (Chang<br />
<strong>and</strong> Lee, 1998), attributed to the higher hydrophobicity <strong>of</strong> foaming activated sludge<br />
(Section 2.3.6.4). Foaming thus provides an indication <strong>of</strong> sludge fouling propensity.<br />
2.3.6.4 Floc characteristics<br />
Floc size Comparison <strong>of</strong> the aggregate size distribution <strong>of</strong> ASP <strong>and</strong> <strong>MBR</strong> sludges<br />
(Cabassud et al., 2004) revealed a distinct difference in terms <strong>of</strong> mean particle sizes<br />
(160 <strong>and</strong> 240 �m, respectively). A bimodal distribution was observed for the <strong>MBR</strong><br />
sludge (5–20 <strong>and</strong> 240 �m), the high concentration <strong>of</strong> small colloids, particles <strong>and</strong><br />
free bacteria being caused by their complete retention by the membrane. In another<br />
study where partial characterisation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>MBR</strong> flocs up to 100 �m was carried out,<br />
floc sizes ranging from 10 to 40 �m were reported with a mean size <strong>of</strong> 25 �m (Bae<br />
<strong>and</strong> Tak, 2005). Floc size distributions reported for three <strong>MBR</strong>s operated at different<br />
SRTs were similar, although the mean floc size increased slightly from 5.2 to 6.6 �m<br />
for SRTs increasing from 20 to 60 days (Lee et al., 2003).<br />
Given the large size <strong>of</strong> the flocculant solids compared to the membrane pore size,<br />
pore plugging by the flocs themselves is not possible. Flocs are also to some extent<br />
impeded, by drag forces <strong>and</strong> shear-induced diffusion, from depositing on the membrane<br />
surface. <strong>The</strong>y nonetheless contribute to fouling through production <strong>of</strong> EPS <strong>and</strong><br />
also directly affect clogging <strong>of</strong> the membrane channels. <strong>The</strong> interaction between EPS<br />
levels <strong>and</strong> floc size is discussed in Section 2.3.6.5, <strong>and</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> ancillary materials to<br />
suppress fouling through floc size <strong>and</strong> structure discussed in Section 2.3.9.5.<br />
Hydrophobicity <strong>and</strong> surface charge A number <strong>of</strong> reports can be found in the literature<br />
providing evidence <strong>of</strong> membrane fouling by highly hydrophobic flocs. Relative<br />
floc hydrophobicity can be directly measured by bacterial adhesion/partition using<br />
hydrocarbons such as hexane (Jang et al., 2005b), or estimated by contact angle<br />
determination (Yu et al., 2005b). Although the direct effect <strong>of</strong> floc hydrophobicity<br />
on <strong>MBR</strong> fouling is difficult to assess, hydrophobicity measurement <strong>of</strong> sludge <strong>and</strong> EPS<br />
solutions has been carried out <strong>and</strong> briefly reported by Jang <strong>and</strong> co-workers (Jang<br />
et al., 2005a; Jang et al., 2005b). EPS level <strong>and</strong> the filamentous index (a parameter<br />
related to the relative presence <strong>of</strong> filamentous bacteria in sludge) directly influence<br />
biomass floc hydrophobicity <strong>and</strong> zeta potential. Excess growth <strong>of</strong> filamentous bacteria<br />
has been reported to yield higher EPS levels, lower zeta potentials, more irregular<br />
floc shape <strong>and</strong> higher hydrophobicity (Meng et al., 2006). Sludge <strong>of</strong> higher foaming<br />
propensity, attributed to its hydrophobic nature, has been shown to produce a flux<br />
decline 100 times greater than that <strong>of</strong> non-foaming sludge (Chang <strong>and</strong> Lee, 1998).<br />
<strong>The</strong> anionic nature <strong>of</strong> the functional groups <strong>of</strong> natural organic materials means that<br />
charge <strong>and</strong> zeta potential <strong>of</strong> activated sludge flocs (<strong>and</strong> EPS) tend to be in the �0.2<br />
to �0.7 meq/g VSS <strong>and</strong> from �20 to �30 mV regions, respectively (Lee et al., 2003;