04.02.2013 Views

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2.11 Concentration <strong>of</strong> SMP components (in mg/L <strong>and</strong> *mg/gSS)<br />

SMPp SMPc Other Operating conditions Reference<br />

Fundamentals 81<br />

8 25 Humic substance: 36 R, (10) Cabassud et al. (2004)<br />

TOC: Up to 8 mg/L S, (�) Gao et al. (2004b)<br />

0.5–9* n.d. –10* 4–37* (TOC) Four pilot-scale Brookes et al. (2003b)<br />

plants, Municipal<br />

0.5–1* n.d. 11* Three full-scale<br />

plants, Municipal<br />

0.5* n.d. 1.5* Full-scale plant,<br />

Industrial<br />

TOC: 30–70 mg/L S, (�), MLSS 15 g/L Liu et al. (2005)<br />

23 7 R, (not available) Evenblij <strong>and</strong> van der<br />

Graaf (2004)<br />

DOC: 5 mg/L S, (20) Shin <strong>and</strong> Kang, 2003<br />

TOC: 8–10 mg/L R, (21) Tao et al. (2005)<br />

10–34 5–33 R, (from 40 to 8) Grelier et al., (2005)<br />

4.5–6 4.5–3.7 S, (20) Ji <strong>and</strong> Zhou (2006)<br />

n.d.: Non detected; S: Synthetic wastewater; R: Real wastewater; SRT are given in days in bracket,<br />

�: infinite SRT (i.e. no wastage).<br />

characterisation pertaining to flocculation, settling <strong>and</strong> dewatering in conventional<br />

ASP technologies (Liu <strong>and</strong> Fang, 2003; Yin et al., 2004) may therefore be germane<br />

to <strong>MBR</strong> technologies.<br />

Since the EPS matrix features in floc formation (Liu <strong>and</strong> Fang, 2003) <strong>and</strong> specifically<br />

the hydrophobic interactions between microbial cells, a decrease in EPS levels<br />

may be expected to cause floc deterioration, as indicated by the results from a comparative<br />

study <strong>of</strong> nitrification/denitrification in an <strong>MBR</strong> (Jang et al., 2005a). This<br />

would seem to imply that too low an EPS level is detrimental to <strong>MBR</strong> performance,<br />

though there is no firm experimental evidence to prove this.<br />

Many operating parameters including gas sparging, substrate composition<br />

(Fawehinmi et al., 2004) <strong>and</strong> OLR (Cha et al., 2004; Ng et al., 2005) appear to affect EPS<br />

characteristics in the <strong>MBR</strong>, but SRT is probably the most significant (Hern<strong>and</strong>ez Rojas<br />

et al., 2005). A decrease in EPS levels has been observed for extended SRTs, with this<br />

reduction becoming negligible at SRTs greater than 30 days (Brookes et al., 2003b).<br />

Lee <strong>and</strong> co-workers (Lee et al., 2003) observed an increase in protein concentration<br />

(along with stable carbohydrate levels) when SRT was increased.<br />

Soluble microbial products Whilst the impact <strong>of</strong> dissolved matter on fouling has been<br />

studied for over a decade, the concept <strong>of</strong> SMP fouling in the <strong>MBR</strong> is a relatively new<br />

one (Chang et al., 2002a), with available data being reported within the last few<br />

years (Table 2.11). Experiments recently conducted with a dual compartment <strong>MBR</strong>,<br />

where the membrane was challenged ostensibly with the mixed liquor supernatant<br />

(i.e. the SMP) rather than the whole biomass (Ng et al., 2005), have revealed greater filtration<br />

resistance from the SMP than from the biomass at 4 g/L MLSS concentration.<br />

This implies that SMP characteristics have a significant impact on membrane permeability.<br />

During filtration, SMP materials are thought to adsorb onto the membrane<br />

surface, block membrane pores <strong>and</strong>/or form a gel structure on the membrane

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!