04.02.2013 Views

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

230 <strong>The</strong> <strong>MBR</strong> <strong>Book</strong><br />

Table 5.8 Effluent characteristics, photographic production plant<br />

Parameter Unit Design value<br />

Mean flow (peak) MLD 0.84 (1.080[St1]) check<br />

Temperature °C 37<br />

pH – 7–8<br />

COD concentration (load) mg/L (kg/day) 1800 (1512)<br />

BOD concentration (load) mg/L (kg/day) 850 (714)<br />

BOD/COD – 0.7<br />

TSS concentration (load) mg/L (kg/day) 48 (40)<br />

Total solids concentration (load) mg/L (kg/day) 79 (94)<br />

TKN mg/L 35<br />

NO � 3 -N (NO � 2 -N) mg/L 30 (25)<br />

Total P concentration (load) mg/L (kg/day) 5 (4.2)<br />

BOD/P ratio – 170<br />

Ag concentration (load) mg/L (kg/day) 47 (40)<br />

5.2.6.1 Fuji photographic production plant<br />

<strong>The</strong> plant at Tilburg in the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s is a photographic paper production plant,<br />

owned by Fuji, discharging waste high in dissolved organic matter (Table 5.8). This<br />

project was initiated in 1998 when a number <strong>of</strong> drivers combined to make the existing<br />

management scheme untenable. Firstly, the province where the factory was based was<br />

advocating reduced ground water usage. Trace chemicals discharged in the wastewater,<br />

although not blacklisted at the time, were viewed as being onerous. Costs levied by the<br />

municipality for wastewater treatment were increasing. Also, the temperature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

water discharged in the summer months was close to the permitted limit <strong>of</strong> 30°C. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

was also a supplementary cost associated with silver recovery from one <strong>of</strong> the sludge<br />

byproducts, this process being outsourced to a specialist company.<br />

A cost benefit analysis revealed that for an estimated capital investment <strong>of</strong> €2.3<br />

million for the recovery plant, savings in sludge treatment, energy <strong>and</strong> chemicals<br />

(amounting to €600000/a), would provide a payback <strong>of</strong> �4 years. Additional savings<br />

arising from reuse <strong>of</strong> reverse osmosis (RO) permeate from the recycling process<br />

were estimated to reduce the payback time further to 2.5–3 years. It was on this<br />

basis that piloting was initiated in 1998 using a 50 L/h s<strong>MBR</strong> pilot plant followed by<br />

a 500 L/h plant in 1999, coupled with an RO pilot plant with a 400 L/h capacity. A<br />

3-month pilot trial based on an i<strong>MBR</strong> pilot plant, estimated to further improve the<br />

cost benefit by �100 k€/a in energy costs, was successfully conducted in 2002 by<br />

the consultants for the project (Keppel Seghers) <strong>and</strong> led to the installation <strong>of</strong> the fullscale<br />

plant.<br />

Plant design <strong>The</strong> plant comprises an <strong>MBR</strong>-RO plant with a 0.75 mm pre-screen.<br />

<strong>The</strong> biological treatment in the <strong>MBR</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> an aeration basin with separate denitrification<br />

from which the sludge flows under gravity to the aeration basin (Fig.<br />

5.18). Aeration is achieved using disc aerators powered by one or two air compressors<br />

which are frequency-controlled to attain a target reactor DO level. A third basin<br />

contains the membrane modules, comprising 12 stacks <strong>of</strong> 135 m 2 area, each fitted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!