06.02.2013 Views

Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and ... - OEHHA

Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and ... - OEHHA

Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and ... - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

study authors noted that no historical c<strong>on</strong>trol database<br />

was available at CIIT at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> analysis.<br />

[The NTP Statistics Subpanel (NTP, 2001) reanalyzed<br />

<strong>the</strong>se data agreed with its results <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

showed a c<strong>on</strong>sistent increase in ventral prostate weight<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 2 replicates. Note that <strong>the</strong> NTP Statistics<br />

Subpanel rejected <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s in Elswick et al.<br />

(2000) that use of multiple pups per litter can decrease<br />

false positive rates in <strong>the</strong>se studies.]<br />

Strengths/Weaknesses: This study dem<strong>on</strong>strated an<br />

increase in ventral prostate weight. These data argue for<br />

multiple pup/litter sampling, a characteristics that has<br />

been uncomm<strong>on</strong> in this literature. The fact that significant<br />

effects were noted in <strong>on</strong>ly in 1 block raise <strong>the</strong><br />

questi<strong>on</strong> of a lack of experience or training am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

technicians. The study referred to in Elswick et al. (2000)<br />

is unpublished <strong>and</strong> not peer-reviewed.<br />

Utility (Adequacy) for CERHR Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Process:<br />

This study is inadequate because it is primarily a<br />

discussi<strong>on</strong> of results published previously <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> new<br />

data presented have inc<strong>on</strong>sistencies in block replicates.<br />

Rubin et al. (2001), supported by <strong>the</strong> Tufts Institute of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment <strong>and</strong> NIH, examined <strong>the</strong> effects of<br />

perinatal bisphenol A exposure <strong>on</strong> estrous cyclicity <strong>and</strong><br />

LH levels in rats. Uterotropic resp<strong>on</strong>ses were examined<br />

in a sec<strong>on</strong>d group of rats, <strong>and</strong> those results are listed in<br />

Table 53. Sprague–Dawley rats were fed Purina Rodent<br />

Chow <strong>and</strong> provided drinking water in glass bottles. The<br />

rats were housed in plastic cages; estrogenicity testing of<br />

ethanol extracts indicated that estrogenic compounds did<br />

not leach from cages at detectable levels. [No informati<strong>on</strong><br />

was provided about bedding.] Dams were weighed<br />

<strong>and</strong> r<strong>and</strong>omly assigned to treatment groups of 6 animals<br />

given drinking water c<strong>on</strong>taining bisphenol A [purity not<br />

reported] at 0 (1% ethanol vehicle), 1, or 10 mg/L from<br />

GD 6 (plug day not indicated) through <strong>the</strong> lactati<strong>on</strong><br />

period. Mean bisphenol A doses were estimated by study<br />

authors at 0.1 <strong>and</strong> 1.2 mg/kg bw/day. At weaning, pups<br />

were given untreated water. Dams were examined <strong>and</strong><br />

weighed during <strong>the</strong> studies. Offspring were sexed <strong>on</strong><br />

PND 2 <strong>and</strong> weighed beginning in <strong>the</strong> postnatal period<br />

<strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinuing through adulthood (n 5 40–53/group<br />

during <strong>the</strong> ne<strong>on</strong>atal period <strong>and</strong> 19–27/sex/group during<br />

adulthood). Anogenital distance was examined during<br />

<strong>the</strong> ne<strong>on</strong>atal period. [It was not clear how many time<br />

points <strong>and</strong> animals were examined. According to 1<br />

study author, anogenital distance was measured <strong>on</strong><br />

PND 2 (A. Soto, pers<strong>on</strong>al communicati<strong>on</strong>, March 2,<br />

2007).] Genital tracts were examined for gross abnormalities<br />

in males killed during <strong>the</strong> ne<strong>on</strong>atal period, at 3<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths, <strong>and</strong> at 5 m<strong>on</strong>ths of age <strong>and</strong> in females killed<br />

during <strong>the</strong> ne<strong>on</strong>atal period, at 8 m<strong>on</strong>ths, <strong>and</strong> at 12–16<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths of age. [The total number of animals examined<br />

at each time period was reported as 12–34, but it is not<br />

known how many/dose group were examined.] Animals<br />

were selected from as many different litters as possible at<br />

each time point. Day of vaginal opening was m<strong>on</strong>itored.<br />

Estrous cyclicity was evaluated daily for 18 days at 4 <strong>and</strong><br />

6 m<strong>on</strong>ths of age in 18–28 rats/group. Eight female<br />

offspring/group were killed 3 m<strong>on</strong>ths later following<br />

ovariectomy to measure serum LH levels using an LH<br />

assay kit; a total of 6–8 values/group were obtained.<br />

Body <strong>and</strong> uterine weights <strong>and</strong> LH levels were analyzed<br />

by ANOVA followed by t-test, Tukey test, or least<br />

significant difference test. Mammary tumors were<br />

Birth Defects Research (Part B) 83:157–395, 2008<br />

BISPHENOL A<br />

251<br />

analyzed by w 2 test, <strong>and</strong> estrous cyclicity data were<br />

analyzed by Kruskall–Wallis test <strong>and</strong> Mann–Whitney Utest.<br />

[It appears that offspring were c<strong>on</strong>sidered <strong>the</strong><br />

statistical unit.]<br />

On PND 4, 7, <strong>and</strong> 11, body weights were significantly<br />

higher in pups from <strong>the</strong> bisphenol A groups than in <strong>the</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>trol group; body weights were higher in animals of<br />

<strong>the</strong> low compared to <strong>the</strong> high-dose group. Body weights<br />

of low-dose females were higher than body weights of<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trol <strong>and</strong> high-dose females at PND 28 <strong>and</strong> bey<strong>on</strong>d.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> percentage of c<strong>on</strong>trol females with regular<br />

estrous cycles was 83% at 4 m<strong>on</strong>ths of age <strong>and</strong> 60% at 6<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths of age, <strong>the</strong> values were reduced significantly in<br />

<strong>the</strong> high-dose group to 21% at 4 m<strong>on</strong>ths of age <strong>and</strong> 23%<br />

at 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths of age. There were no clear patterns of<br />

estrous cycle changes. Periods of diestrus were extended<br />

in some animals <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r animals had extended<br />

periods of proestrus <strong>and</strong>/or estrus. The mean number<br />

of 4–5-day estrous cycles was reduced significantly in<br />

rats of <strong>the</strong> high-dose group at 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths of age. Serum<br />

LH levels in <strong>the</strong> high-dose group were reduced significantly<br />

by B19% compared to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol group<br />

[BMD10 5 0.94, BMDL10 5 0.48, BMD1 SD 5 1.6, <strong>and</strong><br />

BMDL1 SD 5 0.78 mg/kg bw/day]. The treatment group<br />

incidences of females with mammary tumors (10% in<br />

c<strong>on</strong>trols, 20% in <strong>the</strong> low-dose group, <strong>and</strong> 28% in <strong>the</strong><br />

high-dose group) were not statistically different. The<br />

study authors noted that <strong>the</strong> study was not designed to<br />

detect mammary tumors <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> tumors were<br />

detected during routine h<strong>and</strong>ling. No effects were<br />

reported for mean number of pups/litter, sex ratio, day<br />

of vaginal opening, or anogenital distance in <strong>the</strong> ne<strong>on</strong>atal<br />

period. [Data were not shown for anogenital distance.]<br />

In comparing <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>on</strong> estrous cycles <strong>and</strong> LH levels<br />

in animals exposed in <strong>the</strong> perinatal period to <strong>the</strong> lack of<br />

uterotropic effects in animals exposed in <strong>the</strong> postpubertal<br />

period, <strong>the</strong> study authors c<strong>on</strong>cluded that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was evidence of increased sensitivity to bisphenol A<br />

during <strong>the</strong> perinatal period.<br />

Strengths/Weaknesses: This study incorporates a<br />

range of basic developmental <strong>and</strong> gross functi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

reproductive endpoints, but <strong>the</strong> sample sizes are small<br />

(6 dams/group) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> statistical approach does not<br />

appear to use litter as <strong>the</strong> unit. Actual exposures are<br />

poorly defined, particularly postnatally. The plausibility<br />

of <strong>the</strong> estrous cycle changes is a strength.<br />

Utility (Adequacy) for CERHR Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Process:<br />

This study is inadequate for <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> process,<br />

based <strong>on</strong> a lack of adequate c<strong>on</strong>trol for litter effects<br />

Takashima et al. (2001), supported by a Grant-in-Aid<br />

for Health Sciences Research [sp<strong>on</strong>sor not indicated],<br />

examined <strong>the</strong> effect of bisphenol A exposure during<br />

development <strong>on</strong> carcinogenicity induced by N-nitrosobis<br />

(2-hydroxypropyl)amine. [No informati<strong>on</strong> was provided<br />

about caging <strong>and</strong> bedding materials used in this study.]<br />

Female Wistar rats were fed ei<strong>the</strong>r MF diet or soybe<strong>and</strong>evoid<br />

powder diet (Oriental Yeast Co.). In each dietary<br />

group, 10–11 rats/group received bisphenol A [purity<br />

not indicated] at 0 or 1.0% diet. Bisphenol A exposure<br />

commenced 10 weeks before mating <strong>and</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>tinued<br />

through <strong>the</strong> mating, gestati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> lactati<strong>on</strong> periods.<br />

Total intakes of bisphenol A were reported at 21–22 g/rat.<br />

[Assuming an exposure period of B16 weeks, mean<br />

bisphenol A intake over <strong>the</strong> course of <strong>the</strong> study was<br />

estimated at B200 mg/day. Based <strong>on</strong> reported body

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!