Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and ... - OEHHA
Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and ... - OEHHA
Monograph on the Potential Human Reproductive and ... - OEHHA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
278 CHAPIN ET AL.<br />
include small sample size (5 treated dams) <strong>and</strong> lack of<br />
adequate experimental <strong>and</strong> statistical c<strong>on</strong>trol for litter<br />
effects.<br />
Utility (Adequacy) for CERHR Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Process:<br />
Despite certain strengths, this study is inadequate for <strong>the</strong><br />
evaluati<strong>on</strong> process for <strong>the</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>s cited above.<br />
Shikimi et al. (2004), supported by <strong>the</strong> Japan Society<br />
for <strong>the</strong> Promoti<strong>on</strong> of Science for Young Scientists,<br />
examined <strong>the</strong> effects of bisphenol A exposure <strong>on</strong><br />
Purkinje cell development in rats. [No informati<strong>on</strong> was<br />
provided about feed or compositi<strong>on</strong> of caging <strong>and</strong><br />
bedding materials.] At 6–9 days of age, 4 male or female<br />
Fisher rats/group received bisphenol A [purity not<br />
provided] at 0 (sesame oil vehicle), 0.050, or 0.500 mg/<br />
day by injecti<strong>on</strong> into <strong>the</strong> cerebrospinal fluid near <strong>the</strong><br />
regi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>the</strong> cerebellum. During <strong>the</strong> same time period,<br />
additi<strong>on</strong>al groups of 4 rats received 0.500 mg/day<br />
tamoxifen, 0.500 mg/day bisphenol A10.500 mg/day<br />
tamoxifen, or 5 mg/day estradiol benzoate through <strong>the</strong><br />
same exposure route. [Both male <strong>and</strong> female rats were<br />
treated, but it was not indicated if <strong>the</strong>re were equal<br />
numbers in each group; both sexes were apparently<br />
evaluated toge<strong>the</strong>r.] At 10 days of age, pups were killed<br />
<strong>and</strong> vermal cerebella were removed <strong>and</strong> secti<strong>on</strong>ed.<br />
Purkinje cells were examined morphologically following<br />
identificati<strong>on</strong> by calbindin-D28 K immunostaining. Data<br />
were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Duncan multiple<br />
range test.<br />
Treatment with <strong>the</strong> high-dose of bisphenol A increased<br />
Purkinje fiber length. There was no effect <strong>on</strong> crosssecti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
soma area or Purkinje cell number as a result of<br />
bisphenol A treatment. Co-treatment with tamoxifen<br />
inhibited <strong>the</strong> increase in dendritic length that was<br />
observed following treatment with bisphenol A al<strong>on</strong>e.<br />
Estradiol benzoate also induced an increase in dendritic<br />
length of Purkinje fibers that was blocked by tamoxifen.<br />
Treatment with tamoxifen al<strong>on</strong>e also reduced dendritic<br />
fiber length. The effects of octylphenol were also<br />
examined <strong>and</strong> an increase in dendrite length was<br />
observed. The study authors c<strong>on</strong>cluded that bisphenol<br />
A induced Purkinje dendritic growth, possibly through<br />
<strong>the</strong> ER.<br />
Strengths/Weaknesses: The use of estradiol benzoate<br />
as a positive c<strong>on</strong>trol is a strength of this study.<br />
Weaknesses are <strong>the</strong> injecti<strong>on</strong> into cerebrospinal fluid.<br />
Utility (Adequacy) for CERHR Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Process:<br />
This study is inadequate for <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> process due<br />
to uncertainties surrounding <strong>the</strong> route of administrati<strong>on</strong><br />
(i.e., difficulty of relating a cerebrospinal injecti<strong>on</strong> to<br />
human exposures).<br />
Zsarnovszky et al. (2005), supported by NIH, NIEHS,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> American Heart Associati<strong>on</strong>, evaluated <strong>the</strong><br />
effect of intracerebellar injecti<strong>on</strong> of bisphenol A <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
development of activated extracellular signal-regulated<br />
kinase (ERK)-positive cells in cerebellar secti<strong>on</strong>s in<br />
Sprague–Dawley rats. Ne<strong>on</strong>atal rats <strong>on</strong> PND 4–19<br />
underwent a single direct injecti<strong>on</strong> under anes<strong>the</strong>sia of<br />
bisphenol A or 17b-estradiol under stereotactic<br />
guidance into cerebellar folia 6 <strong>and</strong> 7. [For bisphenol<br />
A, <strong>on</strong>ly PND 10 results were given. The number of<br />
animals at each age was not specified, but a figure<br />
legend indicated at least 6/dose group. The purity of <strong>the</strong><br />
chemicals was not specified. The day of birth<br />
was not defined.] C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of <strong>the</strong> chemicals were<br />
10 -12 –10 -6 M [bisphenol A c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s of<br />
0.23 ng/L to 0.23 mg/L]. Uninjected, mock-injected, <strong>and</strong><br />
vehicle-injected c<strong>on</strong>trols were used. Brains were removed<br />
<strong>and</strong> fixed 6 min after <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>set of <strong>the</strong> injecti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Secti<strong>on</strong>s were processed for immunohistochemistry<br />
using an antibody that recognized activated ERK.<br />
Quantitative analysis was performed <strong>on</strong> images of<br />
folium 9. Statistical analysis was performed using<br />
ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey–Kramer multiple<br />
comparis<strong>on</strong> test. Resp<strong>on</strong>se to different chemicals <strong>and</strong><br />
different c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> PND 10 were compared<br />
using 2-factor ANOVA with post-hoc B<strong>on</strong>ferr<strong>on</strong>i test.<br />
Adult rats were also treated but were not included in <strong>the</strong><br />
quantitative analysis.<br />
The qualitative appearance of <strong>the</strong> immunostained<br />
secti<strong>on</strong>s was similar after bisphenol A <strong>and</strong> 17b-estradiol.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> 10 -12 –10 -9 M dose range, <strong>the</strong> quantitative<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>ses to <strong>the</strong> two chemicals were similar. Activated<br />
ERK-positive cells increased with a median effect<br />
c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> of 7.46 pM for 17b-estradiol <strong>and</strong> 3.25 pM<br />
[0.74 ng/L] for bisphenol A. Both chemicals were described<br />
as having an inhibitory effect at higher doses.<br />
[The data graph shows drop-offs to c<strong>on</strong>trol densities at<br />
10 -9 <strong>and</strong> 10 -10 M, with a sec<strong>on</strong>d increase in density at<br />
10 -7 <strong>and</strong> 10 -5 M.] Co-administrati<strong>on</strong> of 10 -10 M17bestradiol<br />
with bisphenol A 10 -12 –10 -10 M [0.23–23 ng/L]<br />
resulted in a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>-dependent decrease in activated<br />
ERK-positive cells compared to <strong>the</strong> administrati<strong>on</strong><br />
of 17b-estradiol al<strong>on</strong>e. The authors c<strong>on</strong>cluded that 17bestradiol<br />
regulates ERK signaling in <strong>the</strong> developing<br />
cerebellum <strong>and</strong> that bisphenol A can mimic <strong>and</strong> also<br />
inhibit this estrogenic effect, with potentially adverse<br />
affects <strong>on</strong> brain development <strong>and</strong> functi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Strengths/Weaknesses: The use of 17b-estradiol as a<br />
positive c<strong>on</strong>trol is a strength of this study. Weaknesses<br />
are <strong>the</strong> intracerebellar injecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> administrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />
a per pup basis.<br />
Utility (Adequacy) for CERHR Evaluati<strong>on</strong> Process:<br />
This study is inadequate for <strong>the</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> process due<br />
uncertainties surrounding <strong>the</strong> route of administrati<strong>on</strong><br />
(i.e., difficulty of relating a cerebrospinal injecti<strong>on</strong> to<br />
human exposures).<br />
3.2.5 Mouse—oral exposure <strong>on</strong>ly during<br />
pregnancy.<br />
3.2.5.1 Studies without neurobehavioral endpoints:<br />
Morrissey et al. (1987), supported by NTP/<br />
NCTR, examined <strong>the</strong> effects of prenatal bisphenol A<br />
exposure in rats <strong>and</strong> mice in studies c<strong>on</strong>ducted according<br />
to GLP. The studies are also available as NTP publicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
for rats (NTP, 1985c) <strong>and</strong> mice (NTP, 1985b). The<br />
study was c<strong>on</strong>ducted in two sets of rats <strong>and</strong> mice <strong>and</strong><br />
data were pooled for each species. [The data for rats<br />
were discussed in Secti<strong>on</strong> 3.2.1.] Animals were fed<br />
Purina 5002 diet, housed in polypropylene or polycarb<strong>on</strong>ate<br />
cages with stainless steel wire lids with Ab-Sorb-Dri<br />
cage bedding. Pregnant CD-1 mice were r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />
assigned to groups of Z10 animals in each set of <strong>the</strong><br />
study, for a total of Z20 animals/dose. On GD 6–15 (GD<br />
0 5 sperm or plug), mice were gavaged with bisphenol A<br />
at 0 (food-grade corn oil), 500, 750, 1000, or 1250 mg/kg<br />
bw/day. Doses were based <strong>on</strong> results of preliminary<br />
studies <strong>and</strong> were expected to result in 10% maternal<br />
mortality at <strong>the</strong> high-dose <strong>and</strong> no toxicity at <strong>the</strong> low<br />
dose. The purity of bisphenol A was 495%, <strong>and</strong> 2,4 0 <br />
bisphenol A was reported as an impurity. C<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
of dosing soluti<strong>on</strong>s were verified. Pregnant animals were<br />
Birth Defects Research (Part B) 83:157–395, 2008