11.02.2013 Views

table of contents - Research and Innovative Technology ...

table of contents - Research and Innovative Technology ...

table of contents - Research and Innovative Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

cance <strong>of</strong> transportation is comparable to that <strong>of</strong><br />

health, food, <strong>and</strong> education.<br />

While GDP attributed to transportation-related<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> provides a measure <strong>of</strong> transportation’s<br />

importance to the economy, it does not<br />

fully reflect the transport content <strong>of</strong> the variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> goods <strong>and</strong> services delivered to final dem<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Value-added by transport industries should provide<br />

that information, except that the St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

Industrial Classification used in the National<br />

Accounts recognizes only for-hire transportation<br />

services. The for-hire industry does not include<br />

the significant role <strong>of</strong> so-called own-use transport<br />

activities carried out by nontransportation<br />

industries in support <strong>of</strong> their primary production.<br />

Thus, transportation’s contribution to the<br />

economy is significantly undercounted. Indeed,<br />

in 1993 (the last year <strong>of</strong> available data), valueadded<br />

originating in the for-hire transportation<br />

services industry was $208 billion.<br />

This <strong>of</strong>fers BTS an important challenge to<br />

find a comprehensive <strong>and</strong> systematic way to<br />

measure transportation’s contribution to the<br />

economy more fully. In turn, such a measure<br />

will allow a better assessment <strong>of</strong> the need for<br />

transportation infrastructure <strong>and</strong> transportation’s<br />

impacts on the production <strong>of</strong> other industries<br />

<strong>and</strong> the environment. To this end, BTS <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic Analysis (BEA) are jointly<br />

developing a Transportation Satellite Account<br />

(TSA). The aim <strong>of</strong> the TSA is, first, to develop a<br />

consistent, comprehensive, <strong>and</strong> reliable means<br />

<strong>of</strong> assessing transportation activities (both forhire<br />

<strong>and</strong> own-use) in relation to other industries<br />

<strong>and</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> the economy; <strong>and</strong>, second, to<br />

create a framework that organizes different types<br />

<strong>of</strong> transportation data (e.g., employment, output,<br />

cost, energy use, infrastructure) in order to facilitate<br />

consistent analysis <strong>of</strong> relationships between<br />

the various aspects <strong>of</strong> transportation.<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> transportation services as<br />

inputs to production varies by industry. In general,<br />

material-intensive industries tend to be transportation<br />

intensive. Measured in producer prices,<br />

xvi<br />

transportation costs range from 10 cents per dollar<br />

<strong>of</strong> output in the glass, stone, <strong>and</strong> clay product<br />

industry to 2 cents per dollar <strong>of</strong> output in the<br />

finance, insurance, <strong>and</strong> real estate industries.<br />

Consumer <strong>and</strong> government expenditures also<br />

are important indicators <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> transportation<br />

to society. In the United States, transportation’s<br />

share in total household expenditures<br />

was 19 percent in 1994. Only housing subsumed<br />

a larger percentage <strong>of</strong> total household expenditures.<br />

Not surprisingly, transportation expenditures<br />

in rural <strong>and</strong> urban areas differ. For<br />

example, in 1994, rural households spent almost<br />

24 percent <strong>of</strong> their incomes on transportation<br />

compared with about 18 percent for urban<br />

households. Also, rural households spent more<br />

(both absolutely <strong>and</strong> proportionately) on vehicle<br />

purchases <strong>and</strong> fuel, but less on insurance <strong>and</strong><br />

repairs than urban households.<br />

Federal spending on transportation increased<br />

in real terms by 6.5 percent between 1982 <strong>and</strong><br />

1992, while spending by state <strong>and</strong> local governments<br />

(excluding federal grants) increased by 46<br />

percent over the same period. In relative terms,<br />

the federal role in financing transportation diminished<br />

from 39 percent to 32 percent between<br />

1982 <strong>and</strong> 1992. Taking federal, state, <strong>and</strong> local<br />

together, most government funds were spent on<br />

highways (about 60 percent), followed by transit,<br />

air, <strong>and</strong> water transportation. Between 1982 <strong>and</strong><br />

1992, the proportion <strong>of</strong> federal spending on transit,<br />

rail, <strong>and</strong> water transport decreased, while air<br />

transport <strong>and</strong> highway funding shares increased.<br />

Between 1977 <strong>and</strong> 1994, federal transportation-related<br />

budget receipts including revenue<br />

from transportation-related federal trust funds<br />

(taxes <strong>and</strong> user fees dedicated to a specific<br />

mode) increased from $16.0 billion to $19.7 billion<br />

(in constant 1987 dollars). The two largest<br />

federal revenue generators are the Highway<br />

Trust Fund—which has a highway account <strong>and</strong>,<br />

since 1983, a transit account—<strong>and</strong> the Airport<br />

<strong>and</strong> Airway Trust Fund. Of these, aviation trust<br />

fund revenues increased the most; transit account

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!